reported S-300PS 5P58D as a slave launcher

[Tarres]

In order to make the 5P58D (slave launcher without the cabin) dependant of the 5P58C (master launcher with the cabin fitted with the instrumentation needed) the following line can be changed:

line 34:

• from: depends_on_unit = { { { "S-300PS 40B6M tr" } } }, 
• to: depends_on_unit = { { { "S-300PS 5P58C ln" } } },

The resultant hierarchy:

Slave launcher (5P58D) to Master launcher (5P58C) to Track radar (40B6M) to command post (54K6) to Search radars (64N6 and/or40B6MD).

From the more moderns S-300PM onwards, all launchers can fire, but we have the early 80´s S-300PS,

Thanks in advance.

P.D. In the ME, the 5P58D is named 5P58C and the 5P58C is named 5P58D. It´s a reported bug.

 

[GumidekCZ]

More than year, No fix, not designated as bug or commented. I have same experience with mine reported bug which are not module specific

[NineLine]

Hi, sorry this was missed, I will ask and see if this can be done.

Thanks.

[BIGNEWY]

The team have a report for this now

thank you