Abrams Study Sim

[BoomBoom]

A Study Sim of the M1A1 Abrams tank or similar with VR support and Multi Crew

[stormrider2]

6 hours ago, BoomBoom said:

A Study Sim of the M1A1 Abrams tank or similar with VR support and Multi Crew

Except for VR, what you want is called Steel Beasts Pro PE.

[Silver_Dragon]

A Study Sim of the M1A1 Abrams tank or similar with VR support and Multi Crew

Some years ago, Wags request info about M1 Abrams tank. None was talk about them.

Enviado desde mi RNE-L21 mediante Tapatalk

[Northstar98]

+9999999999999999999999999999

Heck, for me it doesn't even have to be an Abrams, I'll take basically any tank/IFV from the Cold War onwards.

And hell, I'd take something that wasn't full fidelity, but improved the fidelity of what we currently have (so something more akin to a certain tank game demo).

[Callsign112]

+1 yeah something more like that for sure.

[Apocalypse31]

Honest question (nobody will answer honestly)

Do you any of you even know what a 'study sim' tank is?

Tanks are designed so that an 18-year old from the streets can easily learn and train and become competent in the systems. 

I first trained on an M1A1 in 2006 and it was very easy to learn the basics of the crew stations in only a few short sessions. There's just not that much involved, and its actually fairly easy. This isn't an advanced aircraft like the A10IIC or F-18...tanks are easy to use. 

 

 

What we have now is perfectly fine.

What I think would be more appropriate are enhancements to already existing features in game or fixes for some features that are missing. This includes better/more realistic thermal imagers on vehicles, realistic zoom for vehicles like the M1A2, and fixes for long-standing bugs like the reload bug. 

Examples are shown in my video: https://youtu.be/iVHTVJ-zvJM

 

 

I also hope that the developers don't waste their time with modelling interiors. This is a developer time-suck and pitfall that could be spent in other areas. Most players spend their time looking through a gunsite, scanning outside of their hatch, or with their face in a map. If you're looking at the interior of the vehicle then you're not doing your job (unless you're the loader, in which case, that would be extremely boring in a video game)

Edited May 28, 2022 by Apocalypse31

[draconus]

4 hours ago, Apocalypse31 said:

What I think would be more appropriate...

Creating your own thread is more appropriate in this case.

[Callsign112]

What we have now is usable, but far from being perfectly fine IMO. I would like to see more accurate gun/armor models, more detailed DM for systems, better physics models for power train/tracks. I agree on not spending the time to model the interior, but more time should be put into making the view from each station more accurate like driver, gunner, commander cupola/open hatch ect...