Cab Posted July 22, 2022 Posted July 22, 2022 Looking for a sanity check: After firing one of the wingtip missiles, does anyone else feel like the drag from the remaining missile is too high? 5
Kayos Posted July 22, 2022 Posted July 22, 2022 Agreed, I don't think it should be that much. 3 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Cab Posted July 23, 2022 Author Posted July 23, 2022 Well, that’s it then. 100% of DCS respondents agree the drag of a single wingtip missile is too high. 1
Krez Posted August 6, 2022 Posted August 6, 2022 (edited) The drag is too damn high! Edited August 6, 2022 by Krez 2
Get_Lo Posted August 6, 2022 Posted August 6, 2022 (edited) I was planning to test a variety of planes to compare to the F1 because I think the F1 suffers from FAR too much missile drag on the tip missiles. Glad others think the same. Edited August 7, 2022 by Get_Lo
turkeydriver Posted August 7, 2022 Posted August 7, 2022 The F1 often didn’t fly with empty missile rails because of the impact on drag- although wingtip missiles and rails improve high alpha stability. It’s a relatively small jet, any asymmetric load has an impact VF-2 Bounty Hunters https://www.csg-1.com/ DCS F-14 Pilot/RIO Discord: https://discord.gg/6bbthxk
Cab Posted August 7, 2022 Author Posted August 7, 2022 (edited) 39 minutes ago, turkeydriver said: The F1 often didn’t fly with empty missile rails because of the impact on drag- although wingtip missiles and rails improve high alpha stability. It’s a relatively small jet, any asymmetric load has an impact Maybe. But it seems significantly more pronounced than in other small jets such as the F-5. Here is a track of what I see: Mirage F1 missile launch.trk Edited August 7, 2022 by Cab added track 1
Vek17 Posted August 7, 2022 Posted August 7, 2022 The question becomes is the F-5 under representing the asymmetric load or is the F1 over representing.
Harlikwin Posted August 7, 2022 Posted August 7, 2022 Yeah I've noticed that it does seem to be excessive versus other modules, but it might be right. I have yet to see actual data either way. 1 New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).
sedenion Posted August 7, 2022 Posted August 7, 2022 I also found that payload drag, not only wingtip missiles, seem a bit high. Applying trim once you fired a missile is really not optional. 1
LCO489 Posted August 7, 2022 Posted August 7, 2022 I've tried some loadouts at 25k ft alt and its a big difference when you're clean and with any loadout. Even just wingtips and missiles on it. As soon as you jettison the plane do accelerate fast. It stuck around 400kn IAS with any loadout in general. 1
Harlikwin Posted August 7, 2022 Posted August 7, 2022 Just now, LCO489 said: I've tried some loadouts at 25k ft alt and its a big difference when you're clean and with any loadout. Even just wingtips and missiles on it. As soon as you jettison the plane do accelerate fast. It stuck around 400kn IAS with any loadout in general. Yeah the mirage is pretty sporty with just the wingtips, surprisingly so given its overall low TWR, but I guess its pointy. But yeah any sort of other stores slow it down considerably. 1 New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).
sedenion Posted August 8, 2022 Posted August 8, 2022 12 hours ago, Harlikwin said: Yeah the mirage is pretty sporty with just the wingtips, surprisingly so given its overall low TWR, but I guess its pointy. But yeah any sort of other stores slow it down considerably. This comes with other discussed flight model "issues", like lift at low speed, yaw stability etc. These are fine tunes that will be (hope so) adjusted over time.
Recommended Posts