llOPPOTATOll Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 nullThe GBU-24 CNTL page should look like the attached image instead of how it currently is in DCS. Image is not ITAR, i drew it myself 1
llOPPOTATOll Posted October 5, 2022 Author Posted October 5, 2022 (edited) It is incorrect as is based on OFP Edited October 5, 2022 by llOPPOTATOll
llOPPOTATOll Posted October 6, 2022 Author Posted October 6, 2022 So now its [missing actual evidence], so what is this "actual" evidence that you want? i've provided sufficient evidence of this. 1
Tholozor Posted October 6, 2022 Posted October 6, 2022 (edited) What documentation provides the evidence to support your position? All this thread currently provides is just your word without anything backing it up. Edited October 6, 2022 by Tholozor 2 REAPER 51 | Tholozor VFA-136 (c.2007): https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3305981/ Arleigh Burke Destroyer Pack (2020): https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3313752/
ED Team NineLine Posted October 6, 2022 ED Team Posted October 6, 2022 I am looking through the suggested document now, I have changed to investigating for the time being. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
ED Team NineLine Posted October 6, 2022 ED Team Posted October 6, 2022 I have looked at our design doc on this, while we have the info showing a similar page to what you have shown above, we opted not to show the missing data because we do not have good info on what those items are supposed to show and how they work. For now this is correct as is based on available information. Not showing it was preferred to not having it function correctly. Thanks. 4 2 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
toilet2000 Posted October 7, 2022 Posted October 7, 2022 On 10/6/2022 at 12:11 AM, NineLine said: I have looked at our design doc on this, while we have the info showing a similar page to what you have shown above, we opted not to show the missing data because we do not have good info on what those items are supposed to show and how they work. For now this is correct as is based on available information. Not showing it was preferred to not having it function correctly. Thanks. I have to say, this is very much appreciated as a response to this thread. Makes it clear as to why it is not implemented and is totally understandable. Thanks! 2
Recommended Posts