bigcomputerman Posted January 20, 2023 Share Posted January 20, 2023 BRU-42 with 3x MK-82 clips through FT600 Fuel Tank, same thing in the A-10C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcomputerman Posted January 20, 2023 Author Share Posted January 20, 2023 I would suggest to not being able to add a fuel tank or bombs if there are no space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Vakarian Posted January 20, 2023 Solution Share Posted January 20, 2023 It's a "bug" but in a way it should not allow this loadout 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcomputerman Posted January 20, 2023 Author Share Posted January 20, 2023 8 minutes ago, Vakarian said: It's a "bug" but in a way it should not allow this loadout Yep, so in general never use station 6 when 5 and 7 are in use, good job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yurgon Posted January 20, 2023 Share Posted January 20, 2023 (edited) On a related note, I believe A-10s never load a fuel tank for combat operations. Technically, it would of course fit (taking into account the neighboring weapon stations), they just don't do it. So, pond crossing: external tanks, travel pods, but no weapons. Combat missions: no external tanks, no travel pods. Should it be possible to load this stuff anyway? Yeah, probably. In case of a super secret TOP GUN style deep strike, I'm sure the crews would be given more leeway, so we should be able to do it in DCS. I guess the best solution would be to disable weapon combinations like the one above. But players will figure it out eventually. Edited January 20, 2023 by Yurgon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASAP Posted January 20, 2023 Share Posted January 20, 2023 You cannot in real life load stations 5,6,7 at the same time I’m pretty sure. It’s either 5,7 or 6 for this reason. The jet shouldn’t let you even load it in DSMS I believe. Also to echo Yurgon, no tanks in combat. Those tanks come with some ops limitations and also increase the general explodyness of the aircraft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcomputerman Posted January 22, 2023 Author Share Posted January 22, 2023 (edited) For now I believe we can all agree to prevent the choice of adding/changing pylon 5-7 depending whether or not there is enough space to fit enough arnaments like triple racked bombs with some sort of pod (fuel, or travel), especially for the sake of realism. Wouldn't you agree gentlemen? Edited January 22, 2023 by bigcomputerman fixing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts