Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

TOR not showing in F16 HAD.

Hello CH. Just a little heads up that the TOR does not show up on the F16 HAD or MFD. 

The warning code 15 shows on the RWR. I tested with your models and the ED TOR, which shows up in the HAD. 

Miz file attached & screen shotsScreen_241117_141829.png

Most southern TOR is the ED version - All TORs  set to RED STATE/Weapons hold. 

ED TOR

M2

MK2

M2M

TOR test.miz

Edited by antiload
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, antiload said:

TOR not showing in F16 HAD.

Hello CH. Just a little heads up that the TOR does not show up on the F16 HAD or MFD. 

The warning code 15 shows on the RWR. I tested with your models and the ED TOR, which shows up in the HAD. 

Miz file attached & screen shotsScreen_241117_141829.png

Most southern TOR is the ED version - All TORs  set to RED STATE/Weapons hold. 

ED TOR

M2

MK2

M2M

TOR test.miz 9.4 kB · 0 downloads

Check this post in this thread. 👍🏻

 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, currenthill said:

Check this post in this thread. 👍🏻

 

Thank you CH, I will give this work around a go. Thank you for all you do for this community 💙

I have yet to find a way to add custom assets to the HTS table. But you can do it manually in flight. Just press LIST, 0, E and enter the HARM ID from the table at my site (for example 528 for the LTAMDS radar). Then go into HTS and choose Threat and select MAN for manually. The HTS will then find your custom ID and you can select the target. Since I'm going by memory, forgive me if I got a button name wrong. 👍🏻

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
On 11/13/2024 at 4:51 AM, currenthill said:

Status update

Still working on Russian assets. A lot of testing and fixing smaller issues. I also choose to add a new aircraft asset. 

FsetcpW.jpeg

Hi @currenthill will the MRC Typhoon be included in the list of upcoming assets for the US Pack in the near future? 

Typhon-weapon-system.jpg

Edited by nghitran
  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

PAC-3 intercepts the Kinzhal missile as it maneuvers to evade in the terminal phase at a speed of above Mach 13. However, the success rate of interception was not 100% but still good. I tested a same scenario for five times, and only two were successful.

Digital Combat Simulator  Black Shark Screenshot 2024.11.21 - 00.04.41.81.png

Edited by nghitran
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, nghitran said:

PAC-3 intercepts the Kinzhal missile as it maneuvers to evade in the terminal phase at a speed of above Mach 13. However, the success rate of interception was not 100% but still good. I tested a same scenario for five times, and only two were successful.

Digital Combat Simulator  Black Shark Screenshot 2024.11.21 - 00.04.41.81.png

 

Kinzhal falls like a normal ballistic missile from above, it does not make flip turns and does not fly semi-horizontally before falling

 

Edited by tripod3
  • Like 1

Mr. Croco

Posted
23 minutes ago, tripod3 said:

Kinzhal falls like a normal ballistic missile from above, it does not make flip turns and does not fly semi-horizontally before falling

 

The Kinzhal mod was created by JSN64. I'm not create it, so I can't intervene in it Trajectory.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Zahnatom said:

well tbf all of the ballistic missile stuff is currently borked...

thanks! ED

 

maybe someone can figure out a way to jerry rig the Scud-B onto a Tu-95 🧐🧐

I still using DCS version 2.9.4, so the ballistic like trajectory is still functional. I have attempted to make the ATACMS achieve a mid-phase flight altitude of 49 km and impact the target at around Mach 4 with an angle of 100-120° but can't do 90° in Terminal phase. Perhaps I will try about Kinzhal Trajectory 

However, all of this would violate the original Lua files of original authors. So, I only use them as personal experiments and will not redistribute.

Digital Combat Simulator  Black Shark Screenshot 2024.11.21 - 02.30.42.52.png

Digital Combat Simulator  Black Shark Screenshot 2024.11.21 - 02.32.00.88.png

Edited by nghitran
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Digital Combat Simulator  Black Shark Screenshot 2024.11.21 - 02.28.46.99.png

1 hour ago, Zahnatom said:

found this analysis here; mach 4 for impact speed is definitely too high

https://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/2019/09/missile-sim-performance-evaluation-for_14.html

It a easy fix Just modifying a few line about in boost phase and the terminal speed of the ATACMS can be Mach 3.3.

And do you have any  data about the Iskander? Currently, I have set its terminal speed at Mach 5.8.

Edited by nghitran
Posted (edited)

The last war footage of ATACMS with multi head impacts are pretty impressive!!

ED management should surprise any times with his own ATACMS version. They did with Supercarrier, I bet they bring to you only the ATACMS and all ready with multi war head variants!

Sorry. the footage was actually a Russian ICBM. Correcting here!!

Edited by pepin1234

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, tripod3 said:

Today is first probable combat launch of mid-range ballistic missile with non-nuclear wh.

Good idea for mod for Russia side. For old DCS version😀

That footage is impressive. I have made some change in the Trident II missile from Admiral's OHIO mod. Now, it can reach an altitude of 98 km, and its terminal speed reaches Mach 24. However, since Admiral's mod doesn't include the MIRV animation, it currently can only simulate the second stage of the missile descending to the ground. 

About making Russia ICBM I think not many people still use the old version like me, so it might be difficult for someone to spend time and create a Russian ICBM mod for an outdated version

 

Edited by nghitran
Posted (edited)

Just a question does anybody here know why ED are so how do i say... anti-community? There's been so many issues lately that they seem to just not care to fix, with the latest one being all of the missiles accuracy, trajectory and AI problems.

Im sorry if im wrong or if they have actually communicated with the community and are actively trying to fix these problems, but so far i haven't seen anything that suggests that.. and it's been months now...

Edited by Mast3rShifu
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

 

4 часа назад, Zahnatom сказал:

когда дело доходит до модов, у них странное мнение. кажется, им нравятся моды для транспортных средств или самолетов, но они презирают моды для оружия. они им не нравятся, потому что они вызывают проблемы то тут, то там, и пользователи в конечном итоге жалуются ED здесь, на форуме. я думаю, что это странный двойной стандарт, поскольку другие моды могут вызывать те же проблемы, не только моды на оружие. ну да ладно, это их заявление.

Чёрт возьми, они даже не позволят сторонним разработчикам создавать собственное оружие.

похоже, они не хотят предоставлять пользователям более качественные инструменты для создания более качественных модов. На мой взгляд, они активно вредят нам, внося изменения в ядро, а затем скрывая новые значения

Noticed since version 1.5

 

 

currenthill,when is the update of the Ru package? :worthy:

Edited by ivan-ivanov-1902
Posted
On 11/7/2024 at 6:53 AM, Gogi12 said:

@currenthill Su-34 AI with updated weapons?

Totally agree with this!

CH, can you add modern Russian weapons (glide bombs (UMPK FAB 500/1500), ASMs like KH-36/38/59MK/59MK2) to AI Su-34 (as a part of the Russian Pack) like you did with the Ukrainian Su-24MU? 

Su-34-FAB-500-s-UMPK.png

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
Posted
11 hours ago, Havoc86 said:

Totally agree with this!

CH, can you add modern Russian weapons (glide bombs (UMPK FAB 500/1500), ASMs like KH-36/38/59MK/59MK2) to AI Su-34 (as a part of the Russian Pack) like you did with the Ukrainian Su-24MU? 

Su-34-FAB-500-s-UMPK.png

@currenthill yes please

  • Like 3

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
В 23.11.2024 в 01:25, Havoc86 сказал:

Полностью согласен с этим!

Ч, можете ли вы добавить современное российское вооружение (планирующие бомбы (UMPK FAB 500/1500), противокорабельные ракеты, такие как Х-36/38/59МК/59МК2) в AI Су-34 (в составе российского пакета), как вы сделали с украинским Су-24МУ?

Су-34-ФАБ-500-с-УМПК.png

FAB-250 UMPK need to.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Agreed, I'd love to see what @currenthill can please do with the AI Su-34... add glide bombs and ASMs.  Plus, maybe a paint kit please.  Do have to add that I recently read a book on how Su-34s are used in recent conflicts and other platforms like the Su-35 and Su-30 are used for SEAD.

 

DM me if you want a link to the book.  Not sharing to keep this convo well within DCS Forum rules.

Edited by AvgeekJoe
  • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...