Qcumber Posted April 22 Posted April 22 3 minutes ago, Buzzer1977 said: Just invested the 30 bucks in VirtualDesktop ... Let's see tomorrow how it'll perform ... Did you check the requirements for using VD in terms of using a dedicated router etc? 9800x3d - rtx5080 FE - 64Gb RAM 6000MHz - 2Tb NVME - Quest Pro (previous rift s and Pico 4). Afghanistan – Channel – Cold War Germany - Kola - Normandy 2 – Persian Gulf - Sinai - Syria - South Atlantic. BF-109 - FW-190 A8 - F4 - F5 - F14 - F16 - F86 - I16 - Mig 15 - Mig 21 - Mosquito - P47 - P51 - Spitfire.
Buzzer1977 Posted April 23 Author Posted April 23 7 hours ago, Qcumber said: Did you check the requirements for using VD in terms of using a dedicated router etc? I already have a dedicated 5 GHz 80Mhz bandwidth WLAN AP directly connected to the PC. 1 AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, MSI MEG x570 Unify, G.Skill 128GB DDR4-3200, MSI RTX3090 Ventus 3x 24GB, Samsung PCIe 4.0 M.2 1TB 980 Pro, Seagate PCIe 4.0 M.2 2TB FireCuda 520, Quest 3
Buzzer1977 Posted April 23 Author Posted April 23 Dude, channel width is literally the bandwidth of the channel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandwidth_(signal_processing) AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, MSI MEG x570 Unify, G.Skill 128GB DDR4-3200, MSI RTX3090 Ventus 3x 24GB, Samsung PCIe 4.0 M.2 1TB 980 Pro, Seagate PCIe 4.0 M.2 2TB FireCuda 520, Quest 3
Buzzer1977 Posted April 23 Author Posted April 23 Dude, you lack basic radio knowledge. Perhaps it would be a good idea to look up how radio transmission actually works. AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, MSI MEG x570 Unify, G.Skill 128GB DDR4-3200, MSI RTX3090 Ventus 3x 24GB, Samsung PCIe 4.0 M.2 1TB 980 Pro, Seagate PCIe 4.0 M.2 2TB FireCuda 520, Quest 3
Buzzer1977 Posted April 23 Author Posted April 23 (edited) Alright then Sailor, as long as you don't show up with at least a HAM radio license certificate i don't believe you anything. Edited April 23 by Buzzer1977 AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, MSI MEG x570 Unify, G.Skill 128GB DDR4-3200, MSI RTX3090 Ventus 3x 24GB, Samsung PCIe 4.0 M.2 1TB 980 Pro, Seagate PCIe 4.0 M.2 2TB FireCuda 520, Quest 3
Buzzer1977 Posted April 24 Author Posted April 24 (edited) The SI-standard unit for radio bandwidth is Herz not bits per second. https://x.com/i/grok/share/9OKZR7ERUrsYLpTvpIBUXyshU Edited April 24 by Buzzer1977 AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, MSI MEG x570 Unify, G.Skill 128GB DDR4-3200, MSI RTX3090 Ventus 3x 24GB, Samsung PCIe 4.0 M.2 1TB 980 Pro, Seagate PCIe 4.0 M.2 2TB FireCuda 520, Quest 3
kksnowbear Posted April 24 Posted April 24 (edited) lmao I give up...you can lead a horse... Edited April 24 by kksnowbear Free professional advice: Do not rely upon any advice concerning computers from anyone who uses the terms "beast" or "rocking" to refer to computer hardware. Just...don't. You've been warned. While we're at it, people should stop using the term "uplift" to convey "increase". This is a technical endeavor, we're not in church or at the movies - and it's science, not drama.
Qcumber Posted April 24 Posted April 24 On 4/23/2025 at 6:40 AM, Buzzer1977 said: I already have a dedicated 5 GHz 80Mhz bandwidth WLAN AP directly connected to the PC. How does it run through VD? Any better? 9800x3d - rtx5080 FE - 64Gb RAM 6000MHz - 2Tb NVME - Quest Pro (previous rift s and Pico 4). Afghanistan – Channel – Cold War Germany - Kola - Normandy 2 – Persian Gulf - Sinai - Syria - South Atlantic. BF-109 - FW-190 A8 - F4 - F5 - F14 - F16 - F86 - I16 - Mig 15 - Mig 21 - Mosquito - P47 - P51 - Spitfire.
Buzzer1977 Posted April 24 Author Posted April 24 (edited) 2 hours ago, Qcumber said: How does it run through VD? Any better? Yes. Especially the visual quality from the codec improved so i now can read the gauges again. But performance is still nowhere close to the 5 years old NVidia 3090 ... I've tested 2 scenarios flying in close formation to see how much the driver wastes GPU time over CPU time. A light load scenario flying along some tankers with some escort birds (2 x F-15C, 2xF-16CM) Not much CPU load, but more graphics And a heavy load scenario flying behind only 4 F-4Es, but a lot of other stuff going on on the map making the CPUs life hell to see how much this influences the driver. This was also the scenario with the most spread over the configurations. Going down to a bizarre 3 FPS with MetaLink and Adrenalin 25.3.2 up to 40 FPS with VirtualDesktop and Adrenalin 25.4.1 The biggest performance improvement was yesterdays Adrenalin 25.4.1 release. BUT it's extremely CPU sensitive. It seems the AMD drivers rely much more on CPU performance in VR. The GPU it self was never the limiting factor on the RX9070xt system in VR. I'm going to buy VirtualDesktop for my googles too and do some more 1:1 statistics RX9070xt vs RTX3090 and MetaLink vs SteamLink vs VirtualDesktop. But this has to wait until next week, because my son took his rig to some friends house. They're spending time from thursday to sunday on pizza, coke and gaming in the basement ... Edited April 24 by Buzzer1977 AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, MSI MEG x570 Unify, G.Skill 128GB DDR4-3200, MSI RTX3090 Ventus 3x 24GB, Samsung PCIe 4.0 M.2 1TB 980 Pro, Seagate PCIe 4.0 M.2 2TB FireCuda 520, Quest 3
Miura27 Posted April 28 Posted April 28 Thats a bummer. I am so far happy, even though it looks the way, i remember Top Gun: Fire at will. Performance for me, with my CPU bottle neck is okey. Marianas is garbage, sometimes fps drops near carriers and every now and then. Overall okey, but not great.
Recommended Posts