Northstar98 Posted June 16 Posted June 16 Just going to leave this here: 2 Modules I own: F-14A/B, F-4E, Mi-24P, AJS 37, AV-8B N/A, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk. Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas. System: GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070S FE, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV. Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.
okopanja Posted June 16 Posted June 16 (edited) 56 minutes ago, Northstar98 said: Just going to leave this here: Youtuber got the story to large degree right, but nothing better than a direct source: https://www.vojnaknjizara.com/shop/padenie-nocnogo-яstreba-slavisa-golubovic/ Each crew member has an interview there, at least 2-4 pages each. This is interesting since it covers the P-18 radar, but also inside the radar crew cabin. It dives into the details on how the workflow in SA-3 SAM goes. Also provided is a section discussing popular myths, and which were true and which not. Author did promise to publish English edition of the book, however this did not happen yet. His interview is here: Another book was published by another crew member, but IMHO the author is controversial, since he tried to claim the kill for himself while he was late for duty, so his book is geared toward that story. Needless to say: the first author had to exclude the testimony of the second guy due to their personal dispute. Edited June 16 by okopanja 3
Pilum Posted June 16 Posted June 16 Very interesting stuff @Northstar98 and @okopanja. Years ago I met a German Luftwaffe officer who came by our booth at an airshow and we started talking about the conflict. He was very impressed with the professionalism of the Serbian Air Defense forces and said that although they (NATO) made every effort to catch these batteries once they had started emitting, they were always long gone by the time any strike package got there. 2 Old Crow ECM motto: Those who talk don't know and those who know don't talk........ Pilum aka Holtzauge My homepage: https://militaryaircraftperformance.com/
EricJ Posted June 16 Posted June 16 14 hours ago, NytHawk said: Any SAM system will be able to detect a LO aircraft flying close enough without any EW support if it flies close enough. The details of the F-117 shootdown incident are still murky anyways. There are claims of the F-117s weapons bays being open at/or just before the shootdown, and it is known that quite a few Serbian S-125 systems had radars upgraded to SNR-125M1T specification which had an Infrared sensor and Laser rangefinder which could definitely guide a missile towards an F117. Hopefully we'll learn more soon knowing that F-35s were used in the recent Strikes against Iran, likely flying within Iranian airspace. However I don't feel like this is the time/place to discuss this much further here. Yeah I'm not going to get into much with classified information. It's nothing I really need to know right now, and more focused on how ED is going to handle it. I mean there's probably some kind of thought with the programmers, so we'll have to wait and see. 1 Homepage | Discord | Linktree | YouTube 'Nearly everyone felt the need to express their views on all wars to me, starting with mine. I found myself thinking, “I ate the crap sandwich, you didn’t, so please don’t tell me how it tastes.”' - CPT Cole, US Army
WHOGX5 Posted July 9 Posted July 9 (edited) There is a VSD (Vertical Situation Display) page in the F-35 which will actually show your ownship RCS in real time in relation to threats, as knowing your ownship RCS characteristics is pretty pretty important for stealth based tactics and remaining undetected. With the current RCS implementation in DCS where it's basically just a flat value, the F-35 in particular will either be given a very low RCS value and be undetectable at a lot of distances and aspects where it shouldn't be, or it'll be given a higher RCS value and be detectable at distances and aspects it shouldn't be. This is why DCS needs a polar RCS model, where aircraft will actually have different RCS depending on aspect, both for stealth and non-stealth aircraft, and you can find tonnes of studies online on RCS and aspect, with both experimental and simulated tests on many different airframes, which can be used as a starting point. For example, in a combat scenario where the enemy has multiple aircraft coming at an F-35 from many different directions, where they might have multiple ground based air search radars in different locations, especially when information is shared between these assets via datalink, it might actually make it quite difficult or even impossible for an F-35 to operate undetected and greatly decrease its advantage against inferior aircraft, leveling the playing field. A DCS F-35 pilot would actually have to use planning, tactics and pick his battles in order to retain all the advantages that stealth provides. Without proper RCS modelling in DCS, the F-35 will probably just steamroll everything in every single scenario regardless of the skill and tactics of its pilot. You can see the VSD in action in Military History Visualized's video where he flies an F-35 simulator at some airshow: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88vCjQ8fCb0 Normal configuration: During missile launch with weapon bay doors open: Edited July 9 by WHOGX5 4 -Col. Russ Everts opinion on surface-to-air missiles: "It makes you feel a little better if it's coming for one of your buddies. However, if it's coming for you, it doesn't make you feel too good, but it does rearrange your priorities." DCS Wishlist: MC-130E Combat Talon | F/A-18F Lot 26 | HH-60G Pave Hawk | E-2 Hawkeye/C-2 Greyhound | EA-6A/B Prowler | J-35F2/J Draken | RA-5C Vigilante
draconus Posted July 9 Posted July 9 1 hour ago, WHOGX5 said: With the current RCS implementation in DCS where it's basically just a flat value That depends on the module's radar implementation. Afaik F-15E and M-2000C have aspect-based RCS implemented. Idk about stores' RCS or roll angle dependance. 2 Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Dragon1-1 Posted July 9 Posted July 9 I think it should be quite possible to calculate RCS dynamically on configuration change. Algorithms are out there, and they don't have to be real time, nobody cares if the RCS updates a few miliseconds after the plane drops its payload. 4
NytHawk Posted July 9 Posted July 9 1 hour ago, Dragon1-1 said: I think it should be quite possible to calculate RCS dynamically on configuration change. Algorithms are out there, and they don't have to be real time, nobody cares if the RCS updates a few miliseconds after the plane drops its payload. I mean being fair, as long as RCS is dependent on aspect... you can get away with only having two states; WBD open and WBD closed with a gradual transition between them. Sure flight control position is also a notable factor, but its nowhere near as major as aspect/WBD status. 1
Dragon1-1 Posted July 9 Posted July 9 Remember that both the F-35 and other fighters (this mechanic should be applied across the board) can also have external stores. Flight control position won't really matter, but external stores would, both pylons, racks and actual weapons all have their own RCS. 2
NytHawk Posted July 9 Posted July 9 Just now, Dragon1-1 said: Remember that both the F-35 and other fighters (this mechanic should be applied across the board) can also have external stores. Flight control position won't really matter, but external stores would, both pylons, racks and actual weapons all have their own RCS. Of course
Recommended Posts