ASW Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago I'm reading this topic with great interest. I'm well versed in Soviet civil aviation, especially navigation systems, but I'm not an expert on military aviation. The MiG-29 was my dream plane since the mid-1990s, and I even bought a SEGA just for it. As for the level of electronics in the USSR, I got a color TV in the early 1990s. Nowadays, due to sanctions, Russian-made cars don't have ABS, automatic transmissions, or airbags. They don't even have electric windows. Therefore, I trust the DCS developers. You have to fly, enjoy, and learn how to use what you have. 1 GreyCat_SPb
primus_TR Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago 3 hours ago, ASW said: I'm reading this topic with great interest. I'm well versed in Soviet civil aviation, especially navigation systems, but I'm not an expert on military aviation. The MiG-29 was my dream plane since the mid-1990s, and I even bought a SEGA just for it. As for the level of electronics in the USSR, I got a color TV in the early 1990s. Nowadays, due to sanctions, Russian-made cars don't have ABS, automatic transmissions, or airbags. They don't even have electric windows. Therefore, I trust the DCS developers. You have to fly, enjoy, and learn how to use what you have. If you have any materials related to the SPO15 and its operation in real life vs the implementation in DCS, please feel free to share them also. 1
Кош Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 10 часов назад, Muchocracker сказал: From the most recent wags video https://youtu.be/HyiWR8UYfS4 And other version of MiG-29 has toilet and hyper drive. Guys this is not a serious talk. If you have PRF vs Blanking timeline diagram proving your point please show it. 2 ППС АВТ 100 60 36 Ф < | > ! ПД К i5-10600k/32GB 3600/SSD NVME/4070ti/2560x1440'32/VPC T-50 VPC T-50CM3 throttle Saitek combat rudder
sylkhan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) SPO is designed to not react to friendly radar (SAMs, Fighters...), but in DCS all friendly radar are a threat ? I know that SPO can sometime do mistake (friendly as a threat) but it's all the time. In fact for me this SPO has no utility, or i am missing something. If at least it can do the difference between enemy or friend radar emission, i think it's a minimum. It's for the 2 modes (automatic & stock WP) Edited 6 hours ago by sylkhan
Yurec.orl Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 7 часов назад, ASW сказал: Nowadays, due to sanctions, Russian-made cars don't have ABS, automatic transmissions, or airbags. They don't even have electric windows. This is not only a very poor argument on the topic of this thread - it's not even accurate information. 2
AeriaGloria Posted 24 minutes ago Posted 24 minutes ago 5 hours ago, sylkhan said: SPO is designed to not react to friendly radar (SAMs, Fighters...), but in DCS all friendly radar are a threat ? I know that SPO can sometime do mistake (friendly as a threat) but it's all the time. In fact for me this SPO has no utility, or i am missing something. If at least it can do the difference between enemy or friend radar emission, i think it's a minimum. It's for the 2 modes (automatic & stock WP) SPO will still show radars it does not recognize just not categorize them and thus give them very low priority. Then there are many radars it might confuse as enemy 1 Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com
Recommended Posts