Waldo_II Posted November 3, 2009 Posted November 3, 2009 I have tried many a times to defeat this mighty beast. Even with multiple groups of four Ka-50s, my attacks are consistently in vain. My vikhrs barely scratch the paint, my bombs land only on the ocean surface, and whenever I get close enough for guns, the bright yellow tracers from the mighty Phalanx blot out the sun. Don't get me started on the surface-to-air missiles. Has this feat ever been accomplished? Has anybody ever seen the Carl Vinson sink? I am beginning to believe it to be impossible.
159th_Falcon Posted November 4, 2009 Posted November 4, 2009 If the phalanx system is the problem its gonna be a simple question of numbers. The phalanx was a good system for its days but nowadays its absolute, it can only track one target at a time i believe. So come in numbers to make sure the phalanx system gets overloaded. Then all ya need to do is hit it whit the right type of bombs/missiles (KH25 might do the trick?) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] The keeper of all mathematical knowledge and the oracle of flight modeling.:)
sinelnic Posted November 4, 2009 Posted November 4, 2009 Try Kh-25s... If you´re going to try to sink her with Vikhrs or guns, you might as well land on her with a screwdriver and a six-pack... Westinghouse W-600 refrigerator - Corona six-pack - Marlboro reds - Patience by Girlfriend "Engineering is the art of modelling materials we do not wholly understand, into shapes we cannot precisely analyse so as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess, in such a way that the public has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance." (Dr. A. R. Dykes - British Institution of Structural Engineers, 1976)
Waldo_II Posted November 4, 2009 Author Posted November 4, 2009 Kh-25s haven't proven to be effective either, although they deserve another go. This weekend when I have time I'll be attempting some high-altitude bombing and more Kh-25 engagements, although I doubt that my mere two missiles will have a large enough effect to bring Carl down.
Speed_2 Posted November 4, 2009 Posted November 4, 2009 Well, you can always put the ammo on infinite and see just how many missiles it really does take. arrogant, realism-obsessed Falcon 4 junkie
Martillo1 Posted November 4, 2009 Posted November 4, 2009 Use the rigth tool for the job, and the Ka-50 isn't. Vista, Suerte y al Toro! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Waldo_II Posted November 4, 2009 Author Posted November 4, 2009 Use the rigth tool for the job, and the Ka-50 isn't. I've got a screw to hold together a house, but only a hammer to put it in place.
wickedpenguin Posted November 4, 2009 Posted November 4, 2009 Try sending a flock of B-1s after it, see how they fare. Can you loadout the Lancers with cruise missiles? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
EinsteinEP Posted November 4, 2009 Posted November 4, 2009 Put a couple nukes inboard with some AIM-9Xs outboard for some A/A protection. ;) Shoot to Kill. Play to Have Fun.
26-J39 Posted November 6, 2009 Posted November 6, 2009 If you are hell bent on destroying it for the sake of saying you have destroyed it..:) In ME load your KA50 right on top off the Vinson @ 6000 meters.. and drop all 4 FAB-500's at once.. :D Does work :P
159th_Viper Posted November 6, 2009 Posted November 6, 2009 If you are hell bent on destroying it for the sake of saying you have destroyed it..:) In ME load your KA50 right on top off the Vinson @ 6000 meters.. and drop all 4 FAB-500's at once.. :D Does work :P :D Who would have guessed that Bombs are more effecive than Moskits. What a Strange Virtual World we Inhabit..........:music_whistling: Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
sobek Posted November 6, 2009 Posted November 6, 2009 (edited) Btw. the other day i tried to sink a formation of 3 ships (carl vinson, Oliver H. Perry and Ticonderoga) with cruise missiles and them kinda things. Had 1 4-ship of Su-34s, 1 4-Ship Su-24, 1 Tu-22M, and one Tu-142 atack with their respective anti-ship missiles/cruise missiles. Must have been close to 30 Missiles being fired at the 3 ships. And if the atack was not well coordinated (the missiles not all approaching the target at the same time), those 3 ships shot nearly all missiles down (just 3 or 4 hits, worst case). Are cruise missiles really that ineffective/defense mechanisms that effective? What struck me most was the effectiveness of the phalanx system, especially on the Ticonderoga it's brutally effective because it sits right above the point where the missiles strike, so it has only got to shoot straight and not strafe with the missile. Aren't modern cruise missiles programmed to fly a zig zag pattern right before they hit (to lessen the phalanx PK)? Edited November 6, 2009 by sobek Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
Grimes Posted November 6, 2009 Posted November 6, 2009 I did something like that in Lock On, you really have to saturate the suckers pretty heavily. It helps to throw in a few naval ships that launch cruise missiles also. But if you are gonna do it from the air, you are gonna need at least 2 to 4 more 4 ships. You can probably get away with less if you forgo realism and launch "Operation: Human Shield" by giving all of the AI "fly over" points near the ships to act as a little cannon fodder. The right man in the wrong place makes all the difference in the world. Current Projects: Grayflag Server, Scripting Wiki Useful Links: Mission Scripting Tools MIST-(GitHub) MIST-(Thread) SLMOD, Wiki wishlist, Mission Editing Wiki!, Mission Building Forum
Warbird_242 Posted November 6, 2009 Posted November 6, 2009 Tornado IDS and Sea Eagles seem to work well. Make sure you launch a lot though
WhiskeyJuliet Posted November 6, 2009 Posted November 6, 2009 I think Vinson has four or five Phalanx systems, each with their own fire control radar, so you're still up againt a potent threat - they were designed to defend against umbrella Soviet ASM strikes remember. So I don't know if it would be possible even with multiple KA-50 flights. You really need to hit her below the waterline as it will take forever to cripple her by firing into the flanks and flight deck, and I don't know if Vikhrs could cut that mustard. Rockets sue as hell couldn't do enough damage below the waterline. However all this is based on my knowlege of teh real world versions, but I'm willing to go with it becaue DCS is so accurate. Still, if it burns, there must be some way to kill it.
sobek Posted November 6, 2009 Posted November 6, 2009 You really need to hit her below the waterline as it will take forever to cripple her by firing into the flanks and flight deck, and I don't know if Vikhrs could cut that mustard. Rockets sue as hell couldn't do enough damage below the waterline. However all this is based on my knowlege of teh real world versions, but I'm willing to go with it becaue DCS is so accurate. Ship damage models are not that accurate, i think. That is, you can sink it with cruise missile hits above the surface. Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
WhiskeyJuliet Posted November 6, 2009 Posted November 6, 2009 Ah fair enough. I suppose it would have added alot of extra work for something that would happen rarely in game.
Recommended Posts