wasserfall Posted May 1, 2005 Posted May 1, 2005 Read some posts that the image quality of the ATI cards (x800) is better than fo example the 6600GT or 6800GT, but in some card test the 6600GT performs very wel in Lockon considering the price of that card, planning on buying the 6600GT, but if someone has a better idea i like to here that Intel Core i5-9600K, Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO, 16GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro, Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2080 WINDFORCE 8G
Wolverine Posted May 1, 2005 Posted May 1, 2005 The reviews that I have seen regarding the 6600GT have been very good, nice little card. Lots of potential there. My advice is to go for the one that your budget will let you. If you can afford the 6800GT then by all means get it. If not then the 6600GT is a great card to purchase. I myself was going for the 6800 Ultra but they had none in the store and while ordering it the GT caught my eye. I want my products yesterday so that is why I have this. And considering the speed that I can O/C it to I am very happy. Asus ROG Strix B-560-F, Intel i9-11900k, EVGA GTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra, Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 PC4-24000, 1TB WD Blue SN550 NVME SSD, Asus PB287Q 28" 3840x2160 TN 4K, Thrustmaster Warthog + F/A-18 HOTAS, Thrustmaster MFD Cougar, Thrustmaster TFRP rudder, Razer orbweaver chroma. The artist formerly known as VVS 504 Wolverine.
golfsierra2 Posted May 1, 2005 Posted May 1, 2005 NVIDIA and AMD - air pair that rulez ! kind regards, Raven.... [sigpic]http://www.crc-mindreader.de/CRT/images/Birds2011.gif[/sigpic]
S77th-GOYA Posted May 1, 2005 Posted May 1, 2005 I went from a 9800pro to a 6800 vanilla and preferred the 9800 pro. Image quality was better with the ATI and FPS is about the same. In defense of the 6800, I think I'm cpu limited with my current rig. I'm using an AMD 2500+ Mobile OC'ed to 2.4Ghz.
D-Scythe Posted May 1, 2005 Posted May 1, 2005 If you want the best bang for your cash, go for the X800XL, especially the HIS one. Cost $100 less than its competitors for much of the same performance.
Outlaw24 Posted May 1, 2005 Posted May 1, 2005 I'm very satified with my ATI X800XT Platinum, good FPS rate and eye candy! Spoiler: MSI Z790 Carbon WIFI, i9 14900KF, 64GB DDR4, MSI RTX 4090, VKB STECS Mk ll throttle, VKB Gunfighter Ultimate MCG Pro w/200mm Extension, Winwing Orion Rudder Pedals W/damper, Wingwin Monitors/MFD's, UTC MK II Pro, Virpil TCS Plus Collective, MSI 34" QD-OLED @240Hz monitor, Samsung 970 Pro M2 2TB (for DCS), Playseat Air Force Seat, KW-980 Jetseat, Vaicom Pro, Tek Creations panels and controllers.
Revvin Posted May 2, 2005 Posted May 2, 2005 When I upgraded last August I went back to nVidia after using an ATi 9800 Pro for a few years, I'm happy with the 6800 Ultra OC I have now.
SuperKungFu Posted May 2, 2005 Posted May 2, 2005 Can someone with the ATI RADEON™ X850 XT PCI Express 256MB DDR3 give me an estimate of what fps are you getting with max out settings (that includes water, mirrors, and reflection)? Please? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Maulkin Posted May 2, 2005 Posted May 2, 2005 I have an the following system: ATI Radeaon X850 XT PCI Express 256MB GDDR3 Platinum edition Asus AN8 SLI Deluxe AMD Athalon64 3500+ 1 GB Corsair TwinX RAM Running with 4x AA and 4x AF and the following ingame setting: You will notice that I have not maxed everything out, and I didnt use cockpit mirrors or reflections. The reason for this is that typically I am moving too fast and much too busy to notice full shadows, heat blare, or cockpit reflections. When I start the Su-27 quickstart I am getting 70fps right at the paused position sitting in the cockpit. I decided to fly low over the nearest city and I get about 25fps: --Maulkin Windows 10 64-bit - AMD Ryzen 9 5900X @ 3.7 GHz - 32 GB DDR4 3600MHz RAM - EVGA FTW3 RTX 3080 - Asus Crosshair VIII Hero motherboard - Samsung EVO Pro 1 TB SSD - TrackIR 4 Pro - Thrustmaster Warthog - Saitek rudder pedals - Lilliput UM-80/C with TM Cougars
SuperKungFu Posted May 2, 2005 Posted May 2, 2005 Thanks Maulkin for the info. But damn...this makes me wonder what pc out there could actually handle Lock On with max out settings on everything and still keep it at a reasonable price. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
cjlive Posted May 2, 2005 Posted May 2, 2005 I have an the following system: ATI Radeaon X850 XT PCI Express 256MB GDDR3 Platinum edition Asus AN8 SLI Deluxe AMD Athalon64 3500+ 1 GB Corsair TwinX RAM Running with 4x AA and 4x AF and the following ingame setting: You will notice that I have not maxed everything out, and I didnt use cockpit mirrors or reflections. The reason for this is that typically I am moving too fast and much too busy to notice full shadows, heat blare, or cockpit reflections. You should find that you can get a better frame rate and performance if you increase your resolution. These graphics cards don't seem to like the lower resolutions. I still have a 9600xt and i get better fps etc at 1280*1024 then i do at 1024*768
4c Hajduk Veljko Posted May 2, 2005 Posted May 2, 2005 I am happy with my EVGA 6800GT, however, I am CPU limited at this time! I hope Eagle will code the 1.2 for dual core processors! Thermaltake Kandalf LCS | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R | Etasis ET750 (850W Max) | i7-920 OC to 4.0 GHz | Gigabyte HD5850 | OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 2000 | 2 X 30GB OCZ Vertex SSD in RAID 0 | ASUS VW266H 25.5" | LG Blue Ray 10X burner | TIR 5 | Saitek X-52 Pro | Logitech G930 | Saitek Pro flight rudder pedals | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
Slammin Posted May 2, 2005 Posted May 2, 2005 You should find that you can get a better frame rate and performance if you increase your resolution. These graphics cards don't seem to like the lower resolutions. I still have a 9600xt and i get better fps etc at 1280*1024 then i do at 1024*768 Agreed, at least with faster ATI cards. My 9800XT ran faster at 1280x1024 than 1024x768. As for the OP, I would say get ATI. I went from 9800XT to 6800GT OC and though the card is plenty fast, and I love the Digital Vibrance feature, I don't think I will ever get used to the crappy AA; at least crappy compared to my ATI card. Abit IN9 32x MAX- Kentsfield QX6700 @3520 1.5 vcore watercooled D-Tek Fuzion/PA-160/MCR120/2x MCP655 2x2GB G-Skill 1066 5-5-5-15 2T@1.9vdimm 2x EVGA 580GTX 1.5GB SLI 2x 74GB Sata Raptor Raid0 2x 320GB Hitachi Sata II X-FI Elite Pro Dell U3011 Lian Li V2100B Corsair HX1000
Pilotasso Posted May 2, 2005 Posted May 2, 2005 If I wanted to upgrade my GFX (wich at the time cannot afford to) I would get the x800 pro. I dont think an extra 3fps with the 6800GT would be the reason to choose it over the x800. And the ATI card has better image quality. I say x800pro because I simply will never pay the premium price for the extra pipelines, the top cards are priced exponentialy higher. I noticed a distinct image quality jump when I went from my last G-force to my current card, i dont believe they changed that issue with the newer cards too. I used to have Nvidia cards, but they suck at AA and the 6800 would probably blow up my PSU (OEM, never to trust, and my voltage is at 11.8-11.9V instead of 12'ish wich isnt a good starter for higher loads ) .
Maulkin Posted May 2, 2005 Posted May 2, 2005 You should find that you can get a better frame rate and performance if you increase your resolution. These graphics cards don't seem to like the lower resolutions. I still have a 9600xt and i get better fps etc at 1280*1024 then i do at 1024*768 God knows I would love to, but then I would run into the dreaded 'missing clouds' bug: (see on the left side of river there are clouds with shadows, but on right side just shadows and no clouds) Only thing that fixes it is to fly at 1024x768. I first saw this back when I was using a 9800 Pro (which is what I was using when I took the screen shot). Apparently this is caused on only ATI cards. I guess I should test it again using the new system but I read somewhere it still does it even on my new board. Would prefer to get rid of AA & AF and simply pump the resolution up.... Ill test it tonight to see if this bug still exists and get back to you. I know I still get the other vid bug where terrain at a distance will get these strange vertical bars....but that bug seems to be intermittant and takes time to start up. EDIT: tested the clouds with my new system @ 1280x1024 and I was able to easily duplicate it. Too bad because it looks awesome even with AA and AF disabled, but got pretty much the same framerate. --Maulkin Windows 10 64-bit - AMD Ryzen 9 5900X @ 3.7 GHz - 32 GB DDR4 3600MHz RAM - EVGA FTW3 RTX 3080 - Asus Crosshair VIII Hero motherboard - Samsung EVO Pro 1 TB SSD - TrackIR 4 Pro - Thrustmaster Warthog - Saitek rudder pedals - Lilliput UM-80/C with TM Cougars
Recommended Posts