MTFDarkEagle Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 no that's recommended ;) Lukas - "TIN TIN" - 9th Shrek Air Strike Squadron TIN TIN's Cockpit thread
sage0030 Posted October 5, 2010 Author Posted October 5, 2010 no that's recommended ;) so its not actually 64 bit application then?
Pilotasso Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 You can choose between the 2, or install both .
Feuerfalke Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 so its not actually 64 bit application then? You can install 32bit and/or 64bit. The 64bit is obviously only available if you have a 64bit OS installed. MSI X670E Gaming Plus | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 64 GB DDR4 | AMD RX 6900 XT | LG 55" @ 4K | Cougar 1000 W | CreativeX G6 | TIR5 | CH HOTAS (with BU0836X-12 Bit) + Crosswind Pedals | Win11 64 HP | StreamDeck XL | 3x TM MFD
sage0030 Posted October 5, 2010 Author Posted October 5, 2010 You can install 32bit and/or 64bit. The 64bit is obviously only available if you have a 64bit OS installed. all dcs should be 64 :pilotfly:I will buy this for sure simply because of the 64 bit version part, I saw the start up video lastnight looked really tight,
Feuerfalke Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 64bit allows more memory to be used. That may increase memory caching and loading times, maybe even to hold more stable FPS over intense areas, but it does not magically accelerate your simulation in general. MSI X670E Gaming Plus | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 64 GB DDR4 | AMD RX 6900 XT | LG 55" @ 4K | Cougar 1000 W | CreativeX G6 | TIR5 | CH HOTAS (with BU0836X-12 Bit) + Crosswind Pedals | Win11 64 HP | StreamDeck XL | 3x TM MFD
Steel Jaw Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 I have tried both 32 and 64 bit and do not see a difference. NOW, this is an unoptimized BETA so it's too soon to say much. Also, at present, TIR no go in 64 bit, which is mission kill for me in 64. "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
sage0030 Posted October 5, 2010 Author Posted October 5, 2010 I have tried both 32 and 64 bit and do not see a difference. NOW, this is an unoptimized BETA so it's too soon to say much. Also, at present, TIR no go in 64 bit, which is mission kill for me in 64. it also runs better on what application its made for, if its true 64 bit application it will be more optimized for that and so on,
Hekktor Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 installing 32bit (coz tir driver missing atm) parallel to the 64bit version needs another activation or can i just run the setup a 2nd time but choose 32bit and another installation folder?
sobek Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 installing 32bit (coz tir driver missing atm) parallel to the 64bit version needs another activation or can i just run the setup a 2nd time but choose 32bit and another installation folder? http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=58400 tick the box so both will be installed, no separate folder necessary. Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
Nate--IRL-- Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 installing 32bit (coz tir driver missing atm) parallel to the 64bit version needs another activation or can i just run the setup a 2nd time but choose 32bit and another installation folder? You get the choice of 32bit when installing the 64bit, they are a combined install, no need for a separate folder. The same activation key works for both. Edit:- Too slow :) Nate Ka-50 AutoPilot/stabilisation system description and operation by IvanK- Essential Reading
sage0030 Posted October 5, 2010 Author Posted October 5, 2010 (edited) installing 32bit (coz tir driver missing atm) parallel to the 64bit version needs another activation or can i just run the setup a 2nd time but choose 32bit and another installation folder? if its on the same pc its not going to cost another activation I can tell you this with all dcs products, im thinking even if its different 32/64 bit side by side, just dont activate the other installation if its on same pc im guessing, somone may come in here and correct that, Edited October 5, 2010 by sage0030
ALDEGA Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 I have tried both 32 and 64 bit and do not see a difference. NOW, this is an unoptimized BETA so it's too soon to say much. Also, at present, TIR no go in 64 bit, which is mission kill for me in 64. What is the peak working set (RAM) for DCS:A10 on your system? If it doesn't exceed 2GB then that would explain why you don't see an improvement with the x64 exe. How much RAM does your system have? Which OS?
Steel Jaw Posted November 7, 2010 Posted November 7, 2010 6 GB DDR 3 RAM 1600 speed. All things being equal, should I not see SOME performance improvement going from 32 to 64 bit? Because I don't. "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
Para_Bellum Posted November 7, 2010 Posted November 7, 2010 I have tested both 32- and 64 bit versions on my system and have noticed absolutely zero difference in FPS.
sage0030 Posted November 7, 2010 Author Posted November 7, 2010 (edited) I have tested both 32- and 64 bit versions on my system and have noticed absolutely zero difference in FPS. like the above post said if your in a really big fire fight or what have you, and your on a 64 bit os and say that system has like 4 gig in it the simulation can take up to 4 gig of ram or what ever that is not being used up to 4 gig, but if your on 32 bit os that as far I know can only use 3 gig of ram your performance may lack a little, but I already notice difference on load times, but thats just me, :D depends on situation, MORE POWER TO 64 BIT OSes. Edited November 7, 2010 by sage0030
DocSigma Posted November 7, 2010 Posted November 7, 2010 You can choose between the 2, or install both :joystick: Ryzen9 5800X3D, Gigabyte Aorus X570 Elite, 32Gb Gskill Trident DDR4 3600 CL16, Samsung 990 Pr0 1Tb Nvme Gen4, Evo860 1Tb 2.5 SSD and Team 1Tb 2.5 SSD, MSI Suprim X RTX4090 , Corsair h115i Platinum AIO, NZXT H710i case, Seasonic Focus 850W psu, Gigabyte Aorus AD27QHD Gsync 1ms IPS 2k monitor 144Mhz, Track ir4, VKB Gunfighter Ultimate w/extension, Virpil T50 CM3 Throttle, Saitek terrible pedals, RiftS
Steel Jaw Posted November 7, 2010 Posted November 7, 2010 Again I say: why do I not see any improvement? The stuttering is the same. "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
galagamo Posted November 8, 2010 Posted November 8, 2010 (edited) 6 GB DDR 3 RAM 1600 speed. All things being equal, should I not see SOME performance improvement going from 32 to 64 bit? Because all things are not equal, Lots of crap to take into account before making any assumptions. For example: your ram is kick @ss for sure, but hows that hard drive? Can it maintain enough throughput to even take advantage of all that band width? Unless it's a SSD/RAID set up, I'd say no. Then there's your GPU ram, 512mb Correct? If you have all the candy MSAA/HDR ect,ect You use up your Vram and again your HDD has to pick up the slack. Edited November 8, 2010 by galagamo [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] OS:WIN7 HP X64|MOBO:ASRock Z68|CPU:I52500k@4Ghz|RAM:12Gb 3x4Gb GSkill Ripjaws 9-9-9-24 @1600Mhz|GPU:ASUS GTX580|HDD:2x128Gb Crucial sataIII SSD raid0|PSU:Antek 1000watt|Case:Antek 1200|Peripherals: TMWH|Saitek ProFlight rudder pedals|TrackIr4
Recommended Posts