Jump to content

New MIGs are coolers  

427 members have voted

  1. 1. New MIGs are coolers



Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

HI:

 

I don't know why are so many people asking for US aircraft when there are more than a dozen of thous.

 

Eagle Dynamic make excellent Russian fighter simulators don't change:megalol:

 

The aircraft that I, and so many other guys want are:

 

Mig-29K or Mig-29M

 

Mig-35

 

Su-50T though is prototype aircraft.

 

Su-30MK

 

Mig-21MF

 

:pilotfly:

Edited by Shinigami

La guerra, asi como es madrastra de los cobardes, es madre de los valientes.

 

Cervantes.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

  • Replies 365
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

HI:

 

I hope that they hear us with this poll.

 

Nobody like the Su-50T>>>> what a shame....

La guerra, asi como es madrastra de los cobardes, es madre de los valientes.

 

Cervantes.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted (edited)

Could you name the dozen or so US combat air craft.

 

F15, F16, F18, A10, F22, F35.....

 

I would take a russian bird for sure.

Edited by power5

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Aaron

i7 2600k@4.4ghz, GTX1060-6gb, 16gb DDR3, T16000m, Track IR5

 

BS2-A10C-UH1-FC3-M2000-F18C-A4E-F14B-BF109

Posted

sure I'm with you in that.

 

MIG RULE OVER F

La guerra, asi como es madrastra de los cobardes, es madre de los valientes.

 

Cervantes.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

su33 - i want a new sim with elevators on carrier working too

ASUS Tuf Gaming Pro x570 / AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @ 3.8 / XFX Radeon 6900 XT / 64 GB DDR4 3200 

"This was not in the Manual I did not read", cried the Noob" - BMBM, WWIIOL

Posted
Could you name the dozen or so US combat air craft.

 

F15, F16, F18, A10, F22, F35.....

 

I would take a Russian bird for sure.

 

mm I don't seem to be able to fly those in FC2 or DCS atm. :music_whistling:

beside F15, and A10a.

but there is the USSR birds that are already in the Sim flyable. :thumbup:

  • Like 1

"any failure you meet, is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back",  W Forbes.

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal, it is the courage to continue that counts",
"He who never changes his mind, never changes anything," Winston Churchill.

MSI z690 MPG DDR4 || i9-14900k|| ddr4-128gb PC3200 |zotac RTX 5080|Game max 1300w|Win11| |turtle beach elite pro 5.1|| ViRpiL,T50cm2||MFG Crosswinds|| VT50CM-plus rotor Throttle || G10 RGB EVGA Keyboard/MouseLogitech || PiMax Crystal VR || 32 Asus||

Posted

A Flanker would be awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A Mig, close second.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

OS:WIN7 HP X64|MOBO:ASRock Z68|CPU:I52500k@4Ghz|RAM:12Gb 3x4Gb GSkill Ripjaws 9-9-9-24 @1600Mhz|GPU:ASUS GTX580|HDD:2x128Gb Crucial sataIII SSD raid0|PSU:Antek 1000watt|Case:Antek 1200|Peripherals: TMWH|Saitek ProFlight rudder pedals|TrackIr4

Posted
HI:

 

Eagle Dynamic make excellent Russian fighter simulators don't change

 

 

They are not picking sides lol. They had to chhose something and I am sure eventually a RUS Fighter will come. Hopefully next.

 

MiG-29K for carrier ops!

Posted

Actually where Eagles fly, MiGs die ;)

 

MIG RULE OVER F
  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Posted

+1 for a russian carrier ops fighter. While T-50 would be awesome ED will not get enough information for an high-fidelity simulation. Probably it's one classification level lower than ICBM launch codes. Same prob as with the F-22.

 

I would also like a Su-34. There are some problems in simulating a 2-seater. But then again it would be something new.

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

MB: DFI Lanparty UT P35-T2R

CPU: Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3,6 GHz @ 1,328V

VGA: MSI GTX460 HAWK @ 850/1700/1000 MHz

MFCD: Eizo S2231 22" S-PVA

RAM: A-Data Vitesta 2 x 2048 MB @ 960 MHz

FLT EQPM: Saitek X-52 Pro, TrackIR 5

Posted

As I understand it the Su-30MKI is similar spec to the RuAF Su-35 which is in service so that's my premier choice. A Flanker with all the avionics updates, it's a multirole so that suits the sim very well for mud moving or air superiority missions, and according to Su-30MKI performance it should be competitive with current Eagles updates where avionics is concerned.

The only real difference is using command-controller system in place of AWACS but it performs a similar function just using the sensor data of the flight itself manually coordinated by the rear seat Su-30 (or MiG-31) operator. On the plus side it's much harder to shoot down an Su-30 than it is an E-3.

 

So Su-35 with the optional Su-30M command-controller system in place gets my vote.

Posted

Why does it have to be Russian or US?

 

European ---> Gripen, Mirage, Rafale, Eurofighter, Tornado etc...

 

Anyhow the next one is US. So, they don't have to listen to us (except from bugs to the current sims and minor wishlist arguments). They are listening to their contracts though ;) If you are going to fly in DCS environment, expect nothing less than 99% accuracy.

 

Intel i7 12700k / Corsair H150i Elite Capellix / Asus TUF Z690 Wifi D4 / Corsair Dominator 32GB 3200Mhz / Corsair HW1000W / 1x Samsung SSD 970 Evo Plus 500Gb + 1 Corsair MP600 1TB / ASUS ROG Strix RTX 3080 OC V2 / Fractal Design Meshify 2 / HOTAS Warthog / TFRP Rudder / TrackIR 5 / Dell U2515h 25" Monitor 1440p

Posted

SU33, forget all that have to much unknown data and is double seater.

But since they asked for very high resolution of a UVN70, i would bet its gonna be f18 c/d

  • Like 2

HaF 922, Asus rampage extreme 3 gene, I7 950 with Noctua D14, MSI gtx 460 hawk, G skill 1600 8gb, 1.5 giga samsung HD.

Track IR 5, Hall sensed Cougar, Hall sensed TM RCS TM Warthog(2283), TM MFD, Saitek pro combat rudder, Cougar MFD.

Posted

I want smthing with MFDs. If you have enough data for Su-30MKI Su-35, Mig-35 then i'd like one. If not model whatever imperialist rats can throw at us.

  • Like 1
Posted
Actually where Eagles fly, MiGs die

 

But as long there is no Eagle on the Horizon of DCS we´re pretty safe with our MIGs.

 

Or s it? ;)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

Posted

If you want to play F-22 go play with Atari o NOvaLOgic

 

I agree to with a new russian fighter preferable the mig-29m or the mig-35

La guerra, asi como es madrastra de los cobardes, es madre de los valientes.

 

Cervantes.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted (edited)

I will like to add in the simulator a more advanced wingman commands as the ability that the wingman mark the target and you destroy-it, or to chose the target in the DataLink and the wingman engage-it.

 

Shinigami Out....

Edited by Shinigami

La guerra, asi como es madrastra de los cobardes, es madre de los valientes.

 

Cervantes.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
Actually where Eagles fly, MiGs die ;)

 

Why you say so, Viet Nam, Corea and the US don't say the same, Historically the mig have been better than the F,

La guerra, asi como es madrastra de los cobardes, es madre de los valientes.

 

Cervantes.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

How many F's killed by MiGs vs. MiGs killed by F's since vietnam?

 

Besides, your statement is incorrect. The MiGs were not better, their performance characteristics were better in one part of the envelope, the F's characteristics were better in another.

 

Why you say so, Viet Nam, Corea and the US don't say the same, Historically the mig have been better than the F,

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...