Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
what is a good graphic card for the screen? your comments!

 

27" is not enough information, actually not needed. Resolution matters because the number of pixels is all the graphics card cares about. Monitor size in inches is only an indicator of how far apart those pixel are.

 

If it is a standard HD monitor (1920x1080) then most any decent gaming card will be fine for medium graphics. It also depend on what kind of performance you are after.

 

The rest of the rig matters as well since there is no point in putting a $600 graphics card in, for example, a system with a Core2Quad processor. The processor will still be the bottleneck and little if anything will be gained.

ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup:

Posted

I run a 26 inch with a 8800GT at 1920x1200 and I get very good FPS. I also run a 24 inch off of that same card.

i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED

 

Posted

If your looking at a dell that runs higher then 1080p then you might want something in the league of ATI6950 or better. Otherwise, as cichlidfan said, it depends on the rest of the rig. I'd guess if your dropping coin on a 27"er then your PC must be a good one?

Posted

I have an Gigabyte GTX 570 Windforce 3 on 27"+22" inch monitors.

very happy with it and even runs Crysis 2 maxed out with graphics improvement MOD's (tesselation and tecture MODs).

 

I think you could get away pretty good with GTX 560Ti specially the 448 core edition as well.

 

Of course you need a fast CPU to go along with it. An I5 2500K is fast enough and its cheap. :)

.

Posted

As mentioned, just knowing the size of the screen is completely irrelevant. The native resolution is the important bit.

 

If native resolution is over 1080p, I would recommend a card with extra vRAM - 1.5GB or more. If it's at 1080p, you'll be fine with most anything from a 560 and up, with 560Ti and 570 being the two "best value" options in my opinion - though if the money is here you can still never go wrong with a 580.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер

Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog

DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules |

|
| Life of a Game Tester
Posted

the 27inch monitor specs are max res.1920 x 1080. vid format 1 080 p (FullHD). pic contras 1000:1 / 5000000:1 (dynamic).Samsung 27" LCD Syncmaster S27A750D 1920x1080, 2ms, 120Hz, VGA/HDMI. i was thinking the ati 6990 3gb.

Posted

Pretty much any card will be fine then. 1GB vRAM or more is what I would recommend, and whatever performance capability you end up needing for your game.

 

(Note that a 6990 with 3GB vRAM is actually two 6970 silicons with 1.5GB each. Will work fine.)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер

Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog

DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules |

|
| Life of a Game Tester
Posted

Err, 6970 isn't a "mid range" card... 6970 is the top of the line that AMD has.

 

Basically, 6990 is the same deal as with nVidia's 590 - it's a PCB with not one but two of their best GPU's on it, in a one-card SLI/CF configuration. Old news, this is a concept that has been going on for a long time - for example the GEforce 9800GX2 in 2008, which was one card with two G92 chips on it (the chip inside the 9800GTX), or the GeForce 7950 GX2 back in 2006 which was a paired G71 offering (again, a paiting of the 7900's).

 

This is basically just a logical continuation of SLI/CF stuff. You can, for example, find it easier to build a quad-SLI or quad-CF rig through using two of those rather than 4 of the "standard" card, since four cards would require 4 double-size PCIe x16 slots available and no less than 8 PCIe power connectors.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер

Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog

DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules |

|
| Life of a Game Tester
Posted

same subject different screen, my question is Vsinc on or off on a 42inch LCD sharp aquo? Currious, tried it on and off, but not seing any differents on FPS, however with Vsync on, it looks better, placebo on my eyes?

Antec 900 gaming tower, PSU: Corsair 750W, Q6600, Asus P5K, 8Gig Mushkin, Nvidia eVGA 280 GTX Superclocked 1G DDR3, SSDNOW200 Kingston Drive, TrackIr 3000+Vector, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro joystick, Saitek rudder pedals pro, Sharp 42" inch LCD Aquo. OS: windows 7 64bit.

Posted

Yes, VSync is only useful if you are getting choppy frames that appear to "tear" across the middle. All it really does is to sync up the horizontal and vertical refresh rates of your display output.

If you aim for the sky, you will never hit the ground.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...