FanBoy2006.01 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 (edited) But from there, who is to say for certain the aircraft or the project that its based on is fake?... There is nothing in those pictures that will give you answers on that score. I agree with you wholeheartedly. I can not truly know what they are up to. But that is the worst display I have ever seen. It looks to me like they are bluffing. Hell, it looks like they unveiled the thing at the local Rotarian club! Avionics look like civilian stuff. Compare it to pictures of the HESA Shafaq. The F-313 mockup looks like it was done by spin-doctors and not by engineers. That is why I think it as fake and not an actual project. Edited February 3, 2013 by FanBoy2006.01 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilotasso Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 The mokup of the F-35 also was fake, because it was a mokup, if it ever becomes reality (the F-313) is another question altogether... :D [sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic] My PC specs below:Case: Corsair 400C PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T) RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4 GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cali Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 I saw a full scale mockup of the F-35 at Nellis back in 2008. They can look real. We'll just have to wait and see what happens with this in the future. i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanBoy2006.01 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 The mokup of the F-35 also was fake, because it was a mokup, if it ever becomes reality (the F-313) is another question altogether... :D My point is, that the thing is a political ploy and nothing will come of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk the Jerk Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 I think that Ahmadinejad has been watching old Clint Eastwood movies 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yurgon Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 I think that Ahmadinejad has been watching old Clint Eastwood movies Yeah, but Firefox obviously had a bigger budget. :) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teknetinium Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 (edited) Rafal, Gripen and many other aicrafts are using parts that are produced in other countries, So could F-313 do when it comes to radar avionics and engine (yak-130s would fitt). Since we make the drawings on 3D programs today it becomes much easier for others to make their own airframes. Edited February 8, 2013 by Teknetinium 51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcos Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 I've heard that this aircraft, combat loaded, has faster transonic acceleration than an air-to-air configured F-22. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitterdeath Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Funny how the ejection seat warning is in English. i7 2600 - 8G RAM - 570 GTX - SSD - T.Flight HOTAS X - TrackIR 5 Flying: P-51D Videos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGTharos Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 That's because when launching AAM's, you jettison the missile AFTER the rocket motor is done firing :D I've heard that this aircraft, combat loaded, has faster transonic acceleration than an air-to-air configured F-22. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kusch Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 I'm sorry, but this plane has been disclosed only in order to take something ED community waiting for a patch... Give me "flying telephone pole" (SA-2)! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KLR Rico Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 The only plane homebrew plane Iran is going to get airborne is more likely to look something like this... i5-4670K@4.5GHz / 16 GB RAM / SSD / GTX1080 Rift CV1 / G-seat / modded FFB HOTAS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcos Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 That's because when launching AAM's, you jettison the missile AFTER the rocket motor is done firing :D That might explain how the F-35 does it too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGTharos Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 By firing its missiles in its internal bay? Clever, very clever. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcos Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 By firing its missiles in its internal bay? Clever, very clever. What do you think provides the heat for the jet engine combustion chamber? I also heard it's capable of the speed of light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotorhead Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 It appears that Iran is going to shoot a TopGun remake. They already have F-14's, and this time, MiG-28's will look really futuristic. I'm not sure if this thing can make a 4G inverted dive though... :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts