Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. hello. i updated on 9/17 and got 90+ dl speeds. attach your autoupdate_log.txt maybe some clues.
  3. Well said! I’m having a ton of fun with this module as well and I’m very excited for the rest of the capabilities to be released (especially IFF lol). I didn’t know the COOP switch was unfunctional, my dumbass has been flipping it on during fence-in every flight.
  4. We don't. 1200km (650NM) on internal fuel with high altitude cruise (say FL400) is an abysmal range. We also just established that the range-indication is a slot-machine, not taking wind into account. Sure. But we're talking about a tactical jet over here. That means employing the jet not in some kind of arbitrary "the designer wanted you to do this"-mission, but in an actual tactical engagement with requirements dictated by the sitaution at hand. Under those circumstances, we'll have to see what the jet can do, rather than what it could do if we'de be sticking to some ideal design mission dreamt up by some higher echelon staff officer. The jet can loiter at low speed and high altitude for a bit. But it not anywhere near outperforms the opposition. It just can't carry enough internal fuel to cash in on the airframe's good properties. Leaving out the rough-field intake louvers and taking more gas instead would have been the better design choice. That's pretty much the direction they later took - which is kinda weird if they'd thought they had "enough range" before.
  5. Tbf in reality pilots apparently lowered the volume to almost minimum as well, because it just gave so many warnings.
  6. Just watch the warnings. You'll see emitters jumping around on both azimuth, distance and type. It may well be a very realistic depiction of the SPO15. I'm not knowledgeable enough to argue for our against. But I know for a fact that it is as useless as the SPO10. I fly the Fulcrum like I do the 21: without SPO.
  7. Thank you for reply. The problem is, i even do not know what to change in the registry. Because I do not know where to begin when trying to follow your advice I searcherd for the registry keys but did not find under HKCU\Software\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\Path and HKCU\Software\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World\ Before I did transfer the STEAM installlation it was under "Steam" on D and now it is named " SteamLibrary" on E I assumed, it might have something to do with this? However, before migrating to Drive E it did copy the files from the STEAM installation to the stand alone. Or maybe this feature does not work anymore an it was only by incident I migrated at the same time?
  8. Это известно. Будут править.
  9. Раритет первых серий. С гребнями под килями и без блоков выброса ловушек.
  10. More informative error messages would certainly help. Same applies to the Error 500 issue. It shouldn't be too difficult to add human-readable error messages to the popup and the dcs.log, so users are not left absolutely clueless as to what is going on. I've even detailed a straightforward way to implement that. Should be feasible in a day's work.
  11. Thank you so much brother. I appreciate your hard work!
  12. Фото старое и не моё. А я там уже 3-4 года не появлялся. Так что всё возможно. ...Вот тоже не моё но уникальное точно.
  13. Btw is it actually false warning? I thought it was more like the 21s RWR, where it just picks up radar from the entire battlefield but cant seperate them effectively. Outside of the own radar interference, that sounds pretty troubling.
  14. Вот тут с 8.40 наглядно. При выборе пушки при захвате маркер именно на цели лежит.
  15. Which page is this?
  16. And youre not wrong with that. Maybe im bad at communicating it, but I think the difference isnt quite as big as people sometimes think. For example, is an F4 more suitable for solo operation than a Mig-21 in DCS? Sure! Yet if the Mig-21 gets AWACS support (like EWRS mod), it will immediately dominate the F4 in terms of SA. Give it real soviet style GCI and its not even funny anymore. I would assume the Mig-29 has better SA than the F4 tho, aside from the RWR. Its radar is superior and so is the view out of the cockpit. Aerodynamics/thrust also helps navigating and reacting to dangerous situations. The SPO15 is a weakpoint, but it can see SARH launches I 'think', which the F4 cant.
  17. Overall, I agree with you, except for the missiles. The missiles in DCS are the best in any simulator. I've been following their development for many years. Also, ED guys wrote that the MiG-29 radar is completely based on the new physics and is currently the best in the simulator. Give it a try. We also got the completely new SPO, implemented as closely as possible to the original, and now I hope all future developments will be just as good.
  18. Это баг или фича? по-моему у 29 не показывает (т.е в привычном для нас понимании) маркер на цель, показывает только отклонение антенны. Или я не прав?
  19. From the changelog: With every update of the mod packs, I remove the assets that are now in DCS core.
  20. Да? по-моему его уже там нет. В этом году июне по крайней мере точно не было
  21. I haven't said there is anything better out there; if there were, I'd be there. DCS is the best there is. It doesn't change the fact, however, that overall ecm, rwr (especially blue), iff, radar (except maybe the F4s excellent pulse radar), missile behavior implementations in DCS are imaginative suppositions, which by the way is understandable as these are top secret pieces of info. And therefore realism is targeted by ED; it is not a set in stone promise or provision in DCS. If you have no problem rearming/repairing within minutes, then the same should apppy to other aspects. Gameplay is a thing.
  22. The map should have nothing to do with it. Check for AI wingmen in your flight.
  23. I agree. That's why the first batch of MiG-29s didn't have countermeasures dispensers at all. They did later, but they were only intended for flares. The threat from radar missiles was likely considered insignificant.
  24. I have the same issue, that the Applicatiuon closes after a few seconds. Where do i check if the MENU Key is binded or not? In DCS?
  25. Предыдущий не то выложил. Там уже значительно переделали. Это 29СМ вроде самый первый. Вот 29М. По сути обычный 29 только гак прикрутили. https://disk.yandex.ru/mail/?hash=FTFFQgmh6dGeNc5zSHOxEj9xx5%2B4m8dPfBpq04fI9S8Weo0LazvH8Rwq0WJRJesGq%2FJ6bpmRyOJonT3VoXnDag%3D%3D https://disk.yandex.ru/mail/?hash=9j%2B%2Bd7%2FJL3BLJovxfzbUsH3ha1e8n7Kodck47LCZUODEpKRnhncxWEOpCWfEv5d7q%2FJ6bpmRyOJonT3VoXnDag%3D%3D
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...