All Activity

ok, NTTR is relative easy cause that the US had good data sources for aeronautical data. If you need the beacon data from DCS I have a script for a quick read out.

Not sure what your use case was but DCS has native support for this now so instructions re: Nvidia Profile Inspector, Nvidia app, etc. are no longer needed if you're just wanting to use in DCS.

yup. our target map really is NTTR. Its got all the accurate VOR stations, I think most of the ILS beacons, runways line up perfectly, etc.

We've not made any formal announcements as it is. I think the only formal announcement will come when it actually drops. There's obviously plans I'm more privy to but don't talk about since this project isn't my love child, its scoob and loki's, so I only really parrot publicly what they've said in general chat, media, maybe some in the "questions" thread channel. As for when I work on this personally: I haven't worked on it much right now. A lot of the features we are still missing in flyable at this point on my end atleast are things that are hard to do without DCS SDK. Them two are hard at work on the AI mod right now and yup, everything is done in free time. Such is the reality of a lot of mods and even a lot of 3rd party upcoming modules. 4 years is nothing compared to the Mag3 corsair :p

If you have an iPhone, try CarrierLandingHD and you’ll see exactly what I’m talking about. Don’t you think the wire physics is a little lacking in the way it pays out and just generally behaves when an aircraft’s hook is attached to it?

Ok, so maybe just me then. I can't see it being a problem with my system as it doesn't happen with any other plane. Track attached. Corsair-FFB-twitch01.trk

Maybe because the only real AdA module was made by them, and hence French aircraft fans would congregate there. I suspect quite a few Mirage 2000 drivers would appreciate the Rafale.

This is a part of an open post from one the guys in Polychop (regarding lack of Gazelle updates, posted on the Polychop Simulation Discord, 2025-07-23) As previously stated, the devs are in a Crawl > Walk > Run phase learning module code by essentially reading it backwards and deciphering it. Learning two entirely different sets of code at the same time and trying to manipulate both does not fit this model of learning or progression. The 58 is the more recent module to be released, therefore it is going to receive the attention. Sorry if you don't like that, but that's how it goes. The 58 has more bugs that need addressing (yes we have a list for both modules and this is in fact the case) so they will be ironed out before tending to the Gaz. The 58 has been and continues to be the module with more consumer utilization by a considerable margin since it's release, therefore as previously stated, it is going to receive the attention (and again sorry if you don't like that but that's how it goes). Now, that DOES NOT MEAN THE GAZ IS DEAD and or will not receive work in the future. Nobody go running to Reddit referencing this post, claiming that it is dead and wont receive updates because that simply isn't the case. It will receive work in the future, just not right now, and no I can't tell you when no matter how creative you all get with rephrasing the question of "When Gaz Update." I hope it's okay to post it here on the ED forums. Not great news for Gazelle enjoyers, but it is what it is. Getting the new team up to speed with unfamiliar code is not an easy task. Duplicate that by two modules. It will take time, no way around that.

I'm interested in map making for DCS and therefore your scripts could be very helpful. Are you willing to share them? And yes we shouldn't hijack little nose thread...

Got em squared away aside from the tweaking of the exports to fit inside the frames, thanks!

In addition to what others have said, many of the key commands you map will be the same for multiple aircraft. So I’d suggest mapping the common key commands to the identical control on the stick and throttle. The exception will be the fine tuning of the various axes.

Hi guys ! I just made a training with some friends who have F-18, and I've been surprised that the SPJ was useless ! I remember that, before, F-18 could not lock me above 28Nm when type 2 jamming, and now they were not even disturbed at 80Nm ! Has the SPJ been nerfed ?

What feedback do you need I can implement it into our current Foothold server tonight and look for anything you need to know.

Ah, thanks! Makes sense, while I have no idea it was posted in the RB Discord, or maybe someone just wanted to be an ass. [emoji4] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

You're not going to get any traction on that request. Again, tying up dev time that can and should be spent on actual F-14 things, not fantasy weapons that were never operationally used or even integrated on any of the jets being presented.

In VR you need to push the resolution high to remove ghosting. I don't know what headset you use, or PC specs, but try increasing the resolution to about 4800x4800 pixels. I use Quad Views Foveated Rendering to increase the Foveated resolution to this level and it removes most of the ghosting. Spotting dots are still not great though.

Its certainly possible the EWR had been knocked out, and I will try the 'U' Unknown button - Thanks!

В качестве разрядки. Обычно перед выходом нового модуля меня пихают в командировку и я скулю удаленно по видосам. И на этот раз тоже должен был, но приболел. Сломал ход событий, короче. Посмотрим)))

Тем не менее...

Huge hit to money spent elsewhere, probably. Especially if we're talking post cold-war where the mindset became reducing the sizes and budgeting to military. There's certainly a priority list when it comes to this stuff and trying to convince people to upgrade old airframes when their first thought in their heads is, "Man, this thing is old, gotta find a replacement." Is extremely difficult.

I have your Discord channel but cannot find any information on this. Do you know if anything about this AI module will be there please?

Like I said, I am in favor of getting them added, or at least the functionality added, but they should not be accessible without editing a file in a manner that would break an IC check to keep them off the servers. Basically, I'd like HB to make a functional display and keybinds for the AGM-88 and AGM-65, and add a keybind switch so we can flip between AIM-54 and AIM-120, but not make any of it accessible unless a file edit is made.

Ой, пардоньте! Невнимательно посмотрел. На странице полноценного Миг-29, в стиме, такого уже не пишется. Просто на эмоциях

Этож Миг29 и ГС.