Leaderboard

Вот собственно. В Формате Word 2000 с гиперссылками и добавленной подглавой "Режимы работы прицела АСП-17". Гиперссылки - выделенный текст (у меня синего цвета и подчеркнутый), например AIM120 - наводим мышку, щелкаем и сразу перемещаемся в раздел описания американской ракеты "воздух-воздух" средней дальности AIM-120. Так же соответственно и все остальные . Если будет глючить (аварийное закрытие программы) - отключите проверку грамматики и орфографии в верхней менюшке Сервис-Параметры-Правописание-убрать все галочки с Грамматики и Орфографии. Общий размер RAR - 4,3 Мб. Руководство пилота.part1.rar Руководство пилота.part2.rar Руководство пилота.part3.rar Руководство пилота.part4.rar Руководство пилота.part5.rar

One of the best Lockon movies I ever seen is the "Maximum G" from bSr.L()csta, just wondering if he's planning to release another one... Anyone knows something?

Hey folks. After seeing how the interest for a tomcat movie crawled over 50 "YES", after my last poll, it was time to put the thing together. So here it is, my tribute movie to our beloved F-14 Tomcat, which will not be in service for much longer. Thanks to www.patricksaviation.com for hosting! ;) http://www.patricksaviation.com/sim_videos.php?action=view&id=66 Also thanks to www.lockonskins.co.uk for hosting as well! Link 2: http://www.lockonskins.co.uk/linkcounter.php?LID=247 Enjoy.

Yeah, I second that! I renamed the movie to '_Maximum G', so it shows up at the top of my LO movies. Really one of my favourites.

Maybe in some specific tasks, but the general idea was to do it all BVR. Most pilots were never even trained for close combat. Serbian pilots did train for it, a lot, becouse they knew that nato knew they would rely on GCI - no AWACS here, offcorse. I knew where one GCI was, and my father knew, so did my grandmother, and I bett nato knew, but it never got one shot on it... hoped to jam/intercept it. The idea was to sneak up from low level, pop up and do what you can... But, as I sayed before, nothing much you can do if u'r weapon systems don't work... damn hard to fire R-73 on "сетка". sry 4 spelling... no sleep long time ;)

If that is what you wish to believe Nope I understand that. But you somehow think that in my situation that I was going to fly straight into the archer. Nope, I used my brain and let the archer fly into a hill. Thats because they did fire. I was clear about that. But them firing has nothing to do with it. Its WHEN and WHERE they fired, that does. Key word is the opponent CAN run the missle to the ground, not that he DID. Yes, in fact you did. Your exact quote: "So bottom line, it doesn't matter how you killed 5 F-15s or Flankers, you should've died, no matter how good you and your friend are" Sorry but you are wrong. There are situations that dont agree with you. And it doesnt matter how well the 120 is modelled, it will still run into a hill if not fired in the right situation. The logic is flawed because a bad pilot does not fire when he should, and so the good pilot will manuever to put a hill between him and the missle. Why is this so hard for you to grasp. I am not arguing how good the missle modeling is, or anything else. Physics still applies, hills stop missles. I never said otherwise. I never argued this either. My only arguement is, that if an F15 or an Su27 is inept enough to fire his missle low, at a low target, with plenty of hills between them, he should expect his missle to hit one of those hills. And if he loses sight of the target, and continues on his merry way, he should expect to get an R73 in the face from nowhere. And no matter how much you correct the modelling, aint gonna change that. And as Weta43 shows, the Su25T gets shot down a LOT! As it should. And I have never suggested it wouldnt. But, there are situations that are outside the norm. And I described one of them. But continue to argue it, but I wont, I know what happened, and I know it had nothing to do with the modelling of the missile or anything besides a few bad choices.

Not skilled - they just know where to take advantage of those things in LOMAC that aren't modeled well - Just like a lawyer looking for a loophole in a contract, we have a pilot playing LAWYER not fighter pilot. I reiterate: Where's the skill in that?:confused:

Yes, you actually did. I'm not going to re-quote your previous post, because that's just silly. Why would I have to prove something you just said? So a newb F-15 pilot killing a veteran Su-25T pilot should be seen as the game compensating for the newb? That is ridiculous. And the line about the best pilot wins only applies to aircraft of the same type. I dunno about you, but last time I checked, an F-15C/Su-27 is a completely different type of military aircraft than a Su-25T. You must've read past the part where I said a Su-25T shoulda died in a head on Archer engagement. Funny how you never mentioned how your opponents never fired. Interesting. What's wrong with that is an F-15 can also carry AIM-9Ms, or fire AIM-120s from AIM-9M range. You seem to be missing the idea that if you have enough time to run incoming missiles to the ground, so does your opponent against your missiles. It's an easy concept: if you can hit him, he can hit you. Right, I said that. What logic is flawed? The fact that if an F-15 launches an AIM-9/AIM-120 at 2 miles at a Su-25T beak to beak who fires back with a R-73 that chances are both jets should die? That is exactly the point. Lock On shouldn't compensate for bad pilots, but it shouldn't allow good pilots live forever, which it currently does. A good pilot will have a ridiculously easy time evading enemy missiles in LOMAC, something no one can deny. Such a pilot is almost gauranteed to survive even if he's in a high threat zone, like an enemy's NEZ. I'm sorry, but that pilot should get shot down. Avoiding high threat zones/situations should be more important to being a good pilot than being able to waltz around missiles, which shouldn't happen. And this is one aspect of missile combat that Lock On has failed to simulate. That avoiding the lethal envelope of an enemy's weapon employment zone is more important than evading the weapons fired at you. I can't get why you can't understand this concept, that Lock On rewards skilled pilots too much sometimes. Yet, it also allows skilled pilots to live forever. Yay, we have a fun game...

So what, the Eagles and Flankers didn't take any missile shots at you two at all? Sure, you had Archers, but a Su-27 could also have Archers, and in a dogfight between two heavily loaded Su-25Ts and one Su-27 equipped to kill, I'm sorry, but most people would expect the Flanker to win, R-73s or not. Unless the 15s and 27s took no AMRAAM/R-27ER/ET shots at either of you, even bad tactics wouldn't compensate for a Su-25T's weaknesses in a WVR situation with such fighters. So what if you had AWACs? A pair of Su-25Ts should RUN, not stay and fight. That would be the realistic thing to do.

Предложу и свой труд, кому интересно: Руководство по боевому применению МиГ-29 в формате doc. http://www.megaupload.com/?d=YN222ZOZ Для удобства и при наличии свободного места рекомендуется после скачивания перегнать файл в формат rtf - это ускорит работу (все картинки будут уже загружены, но файл будет весить 147Mb).

He already said more than enough, don't push it.