Leaderboard

There may be hope for lefties desiring a real HOTAS: http://www.ch-hangar.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=3152

You seem to have a nasty 'knowing-all' attitude issue. I see nothing insulting in my post, but still you take it to that level. Nice going. Aren't the search, track, designation, launch and flight to the target part of a missile intercepting another missile process? The missile isn't going to fall off the pylon and guide itself to the incoming missile. So, the case of a Phoenix intercepting a missile in it's terminating pop-up phase is possible only if a Tomcat is on it's tail and even then it's questionable. If it's not likely to happen in real-life, makes it one of those newspaper stories especially since it was never proven by a live test. It's not my fault that you take this as a fact and advertise it along. I'm not disproving the optimizations made in the C version for better chance of intercepting more maneuverable targets, I'm just going after this claim because I believe it's pointless. It's exactly like the story of the F-117 being capable of intercepting airplanes with Sidewinders. Possible? Yes, on paper. Ever going to happen? No.

Severomorsk... Oh man this is much better than NASA's WirlWind :eek: . Attachments: 1). Severomorsk overview. 2). Severomorsk airfield close-up(aircraft) 3). 2x Udaloy class vessels(positively identifiable). 4). 2x Sovremenny class vessels. 5). 1x Kirov class. Cheers, - JJ.

Are these increases in FPS just perceived increases, or are they actual provable increases (i.e. not just people wishing and beleiveing it increases fps?)

Try notepad++ http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/site.htm