Leaderboard

hi Witchking Thank you very much. Yes youre right. Wounded soldiers must fall- and i had build that. Now i think ist ready. I had test my soldiers on Jalta-Beach. It looks like D-day. I thank god that i`m in the airforce:music_whistling: If you want pictures or want to download join this Link: http://www.lockonforum.de/thread.php?postid=23492#post23492 Have a nice day TOMCATZ:)

Hello Friends, I had build some Soldiers. Whats your meaning about it?

I know that A lot of us that have Cougars were worrying about what would happen with the release of Vista... Well I've been busy experimenting and just generally getting the feel of Vista 64 now that I have it installed on my old AMD 64.. So I was just going to wait until the right time to install Vista 32 on my new gaming rig... Forget about Vista 64 for gaming.. The 64 bit drivers are signed, and I don't think that I'll be able to use all of my additional hardware with that OS.. So today I was over at Cougar World snooping around and happened to find this very interesting bit of information... It appears that Thrust master has come through with Vista drivers.. http://ts.thrustmaster.com/eng/index...3&pid=50&cid=1 (Direct download link, 48mb: ftp://ftp.thrustmaster.com/accessori...STA_32_RC1.exe) So for me I think the waiting period is just about over.. Its seems to be the right time to install Vista 32 on my gaming rig... So with Alchemy for my X-fi Audio ... and Thrust master Vista drivers, and My BFG 8800 GPU I'm ready to experience Directx 10 in FSX... The new Nvidia drivers that were just released at the beginning of May are DX 10 ... ~S~ Blaze

I recently acquired a complete set of Aviation magazines that look like they were printed back in the early nineties. There's over a hundred and fifty of them and they mainly consist of interviews with pilots and designers of pretty much every fighter and civilian aircraft you can think of, from WWI to GF1..as well as Concorde, Boeing etc.. I've only looked through a few of them so far and there's some pretty good articles that some of you may find interesting. Here's a couple of them I found and scanned in on the Mig-29. The first one is an interview with one of the Mig test pilots and a designer from Mikoyan Design Bureau. The second documents the development of the Mig29.

to the top, to the top... uhhhhhhh na,nahhhh, na, nah :punk: :smoke:

Great Job! I can’t believe I watched the whole thing (Red Flag TAC view file)…twice! And it was very interesting to say the least. I found a little time in between clearing (if you have been in the military you know what that means…retirement after 24yrs of service) to look at the track. I watched the now famous “JoJo” shot…sucked to be on the wrong end of that “9”. I salute all who participated in that historic event and hope that each squad awards a Red Flag ribbon to their pilots. I’m not going to beat a dead horse dealing with the rules or about what was right versus what was wrong. Another salute to the personnel (you know who you are) that took the time to make it happen, grateful the community should be. My hope is that something as monumental as this will only get bigger. Again, I salute you all!!

I've put off flight sim for almost 2 years (had a baby inbound) and just now trying to get back into it. And 2 of my favourite sims have returned as a better product. For now, I'm having fun with both. There are definitely strengths in both products and I really wish we can mix the two together. Heck, if somone can create campaign translator from Falcon to LOMAC... if that's even possible, that'd be heaven. Sorry, didn't mean to turn this into F4 vs Lomac. Both are great sims.

(Сочи, Адлер, Хоста). Куда кидать, в каком формате (я не знаю, какое качество дает бытовая камера, на mp3 Creative Zen, пойдет), и как срочно? Лучше разделять на: у моря (шторм, дождь, чайки в основном), в городе (птицы тоже поют), в поселках, в горах, лето, зима, осень. Везде разные звуки. Наверное, пока могу сделать текущий период. :)

More LOCERF suggestions . . . Mission start time will be what it will be. Those that would like to participate must do what is necessary to try and be there. I’m confident that the organizers are doing what they can to try to accommodate as many pilots/squads as possible. That being said, to further encourage participation from as many “serious” pilots as possible, I’d like to suggest we consider an overall mission time of approximately 5 hours. I realize this creates an additional workload on whomever monitors the event, but it will allow for larger community participation. A few of the things I’d like to suggest for future events are: • Each pilot or squad would only fly a maximum of 2-1/2 hours with 20-30 minutes being allowed prior to mission take-off time (assigned task/objective) to join the server and work out any connection issues (as suggested by Breakshot or Breadfan, I forget whom, sorry). The only exception to this would occur if a pilot failed to show. In that case, those already flying would be given the option of continuing and fulfilling the role of the assigned task. • Pilot/Squad must take-off or taxi within 5 minutes of assigned task take-off time thus beginning their first sortie. • If for whatever reason pilot/squad can’t taxi/take-off within this 5 minute window, they must withdraw from that day’s competition. • No spectators should be allowed. I suggest this not to be a hard-ass, but instead to maximize the server’s performance for everyone flying by limiting the amount of pilots on the server at any given time. • This would also encourage more “serious” pilots to participate that are not in squads. I’d hope that the intent is to open LOCERF up to as many pilots as possible as a “learning from a shared community” experience, without penalizing those that are not in squads. I suggest “serious pilots” because yahoos that would only join to cause mischief and mayhem is something we definitely do not want. Maybe screening would be necessary and I’m sure Fudd has a good handle on this (although, he may need some help if the number of interested pilots becomes too large). So, potentially, a chart posting join time window, task take-off time, mission completion time and exit from server time could be posted for all scheduled participants, allowing for upwards of 60-75 pilots, but only a max of 40 or so would be in the server at any given time. A matrix can be worked out to better illustrate this suggestion. • An ATC (another 504 suggestion) should also be in place for each side to ensure the above ROEs are followed. Violators will be reprimanded by being dropped from server (or flogged) whichever is more appropriate. • Once the 5 hour mark has arrived, Red Flag concludes and scores are tallied. • Rules on R&R, IMO, should be based upon the mission design and the squads that contribute the mission for that LOCERF session. ROE and Tasks/Objectives should clearly state what is appropriate and be discussed and reviewed by all participating pilots/squads. Everyone needs to take responsibility to know what’s going on. No excuses! You get severely penalized for not properly reviewing the Rules of Engagement regarding Rearming and Refueling. • A severe penalty for Team Kills (-150), great idea. • -5 points instead of -10 for missiles fired that don’t hit a target. -5 because, -10 would almost certainly guarantee a negative score for most participants flying fighters. A plane carrying a payload of 6 would potentially end up with -30 points instead of -60. If that plane scored a kill with the last missile fired, at least that pilot would end up with a score of +5 or +15, instead of -20 or -10. It would potentially end up being an even lower score for fighters carrying a payload of 8, 10 or 12 weapons. And keep in mind, this is just for one sortie. If that fighters role is to perform a CAP and maintain a defensive front he would most certainly be penalized attempting to effectively do so, or if the fighter is merely using his weapons in an attempt to survive. I do agree with the penalty for employing weapons that hit nothing (they cost $ right?), however I think -10 is a bit too severe in light of the score recieved if one of the missiles actually hit the target. Remember, these are only suggestions and obviously open for discussion. Fudd can make the final decisions.

когда модели кораблей будут иметь нормальную модель ниже ватерлинии - сделаем.

Попробуй посмотреть ..\Config\World\World.lua

Просьба ко всем у кого есть фото Hydra 70 , особенно касательно оперения ракеты и надписей на фюзеляже , пришлите плз. на gys71@mail.ru