Leaderboard

Here we go again... :( Guys chill out... This is a discussion place for us to talk about a simulator that is being made for you to have some fun with. If you don't agree with what BS will or will not be, don't buy it. If it doesn't do what xyz simulator does or promises, go fly xyz simulator. If there is something you'd like to see, bring it up, but don't bitch and moan about it. We're all here because we're fans in one way or another, let's discuss, not argue. Now, I'm going back to hugging my tree... and thanks to TekaTeka, it sure is pretty now :thumbup:

We have seen a lot of those lists, and many squads have disappeared already, so here is a nice update provided by a Danish guy (no, not JJ): Combat wings & squadrons http://www.serik.dk/page2.html Aerobatic units http://www.serik.dk/page3.html

I love that attitude. Me personally, I've been looking for evidence of the affair between Claudia Schiffer and Anna Kournikova for years - no success yet, but I know it happened. It's only a matter of time.

We prefer to concentrate on the new engine. It is our future, and so it is yours... Everybody in this 'business' takes his place. Thanks to Oleg for the great amount of new participants, anyway we need to move forward. I hope that our way for clickable+6DOF+HiFidelityFM planes will bring some ideas to Oleg of where to move...

Не понял, каким образом ? Себя бы она могла убить, а вот двух человек как ??? Или они уже в ванной сидели и смотрели как она кипятильник несет ???

Редиска - советы твои редисочные :) Прочитал на три поста выше, что я писал?

Viper, Viper... you are sooooo behind :D by the time you install Cat's 7.7 Cat's 7.8 will be out :P

Да - UPC надо менять. Проконсультируйся только на что, дабы не было проблем

I think that this position actually sums things up pretty well. A number of people have indeed crossed the line between goods sense to a sense of entitlement and even to just insulting the developers (who are producing one hell of a better product thant would be the case if they didn't care -eg. jetfighter IV and V). It would be interesting to conduct a plebicite to see how people respond to the new rules: "4)This forum is a meeting place that includes the producers, developers of LOMAC, beta testers and other representatives of the the simulation. They are very passionate about the sim and want to make it better. They welcome feedback good and bad. They do not shy away from constructive criticism. At the same time they do not need to be harassed. Please show them and their product the respect it deserves. Mature, throught out criticism will be welcomed. With this in mind attacking them or the simulation will not be tolerated. Posts full of insults and derogatory language will be removed and the posters warned. This is not a customer service avenue to Ubisoft. If you wish to contact Ubisoft because this product fails your expectations please contact Ubisoft directly: http://support.ubi.com/"

Inbound rep, thank you man :thumbsup:

:) I know far too much and people on every side, to have to brown nose. I just handle my business Kolt40Five.

When I talked with our mig-29 pilots about some bvr and close combats against other aircrafts like F-16 and hawks I heard som interesting but well known things. F-16 got advantage in BVR (our mig-29A early version got poor radar) but in close combat Migs got advantages. Also experiences of pilots are very important. Before few months some hawks pilots trained here against our pilots and as our pilots said - they were very dangerous and experienced with many and many hours in hawks. Mostly they were instructors on hawks in Britain, so best of the best. So you know what I mean. But MIG-29s engage them all - and reason? Power of RD-33. This information is for sure secret :) so pssssst. So, whitch plane is better? If you got well trained pilots, with powerfull jets and newest electronic, you are on the right way to say - my plane will win most of fights. But If you miss something (for exp.trained pilots) they could fail also on jets like Su-27SM or F-35.

To keep you updated, a bigger update this time :D I've been busy with the radar skew button, designing the housing for the ministick and such. 1 Complete assembled in the stick. 2 Exploded view 01 3 Exploded view 02 4 Time to build some test parts in the stereolithografie machine. (This time in the machine with the transparant resin). 5 The completed parts, the stick and the rubber are allready spraypainted in this picture. 6 Offcourse to test the rubber we have to make a silicon mould of the stereolithografie part, so it's time to prepare this part for mould building. 7 Completed a simple casing to cast the silicon. 8 Casting the composite silicon with the silicon dispenser machine. 9 After the silicon is hardened, we can open the mould with an operating knife, the wave patterns and the metal rods are there to insure a good alignment of the mould layers. 10 After the mould is heated to 70 degrees celsius we can cast the composite polyurethane rubber into the silicon mould in the vacuum chamber, we are looking through a 6 cm thick glass in this picture. 11 And after hardening in the oven for an hour at 70 degrees celsius we can demould the casting and cut off the casting tree. Here you can see a complete assembled "Radar skew" 12 Another view, this time with the button rotated to the upper left corner, the rubber seems to do it's job :) Thanks for watching, see you :joystick:

Wow, over 7000 views on this thread, that's like a new record :D (for my own threads atleast)