Leaderboard

BVR to NAV to BVR mode Offline and Online Bug In Singleplayer you can switch on BVR mode, Radar on, Azimuth...HI MED ILV .....elevation.....etc etc....... after setting Radar u can switch back to NAV and back again to BVRmode just pressing "2" again....and your reset Radar (HUD) stays how it was.... In Mulitplayer NOT !! Rear-Aspect TDS BOX over Target Bug If you follow a plane and u activate your Radar and you move your TDS over his signature in your HUD he gets a LOCK-WARNING just by this... Wihtout pressing LOCK !!! Cockpit FOV Zoom ( also made very wrong in other sims) You should be albe to act or move your Head inside your Cockpit , with TrackIR or keys or Joyslider as before - like going closer to instruments (leaning) but this Zooming should defintly not include this mega "zooming in effect of outside world" (20 -120 FOV) thats totally crap . .. a inviting backdoor to fly arcade style and ppl do so... Think like a Pilot without being afraid having disadvantage not using it thinking others do....... Solution for this plz.! Standart is 70 blankinstall - limitation 55-85 FOV is one way for example...but still moving your body in your pit doesnt bring outside world closer and bigger...!!!! plz really think about this and its effect on different cases of flying. Chaff G add Gravity to chaffs all other wishes i save here cuz i know how scriptrelated all is written and it would be probalby not possible to make that affort to change things.. Crosswind effects while wheels on ground reduce it.... if wheels on ground it doesnt blow you away the same way as your are airborne (add difference in code of touch ground and airborne) G-effect I guess the reduce / realistic thing was a try to do... i dont knwo what to do but do again.... :) No need to render water under terrain.. FSX had the same problem but figured it out... and for this one u will hate me :P change holographic Trees with crash-able ones ;)))) thx you In respect Me

:music_whistling:

Her is some pictures of the up grade http://prometheus.med.utah.edu/~bwjones/C1311122445/E20070430115307/index.html

Uploaded to lockonfiles...will be up when Thomas gets done beating his hosting company with a length of rubber hose. :)

Много уважаемый =RAF=Skyline если ты чего то не знаешь, то это не значит что этого нет. Ты ничего не понял что я написал... Про дубов пропущу и не буду повторять ошибки офицера. Теперь постараюсь немного разжевать : "стекла" - написано в кавычках, а значит понимать не в буквальном смысле те стекла которые в рамах домов :). Есть на карте зоны в которые с определенных направлений нельзя в полной мере использовать оптико-телевизионный комплекс "Шквал" По этому создается такой эфект стекла вроде ты цель видишь, а маркер "шквала" в АС не поставишь. А стекла в домах никто выносить не собирался и если ты не понял, то переспроси а не раскидывай дубы....! По поводу того чтоб купить 4 гига ОЗУ ты меня сам убил :) с таким подходом я тебе напишу прогу при которой тебя начнет глючить и 20 гигов оперативы и что ты побежишь в магазин покупать еще 20 чтоб не глючело или проще истравить баг от которого это все происходит ... Не увлекайся последствиями, руби корень... Конечно если ты ястреб зачем тебе "шквал" и с твоей точки зрения так можно вобще штурмы не делать ведь ястребы тоже могут бомбы и ракеты ВЗ таскать..но эту разницу ты должен понять сам как поняли наши генералы когда всетаки поняли что штурмовая авиация нужна и есть в ней большая разница. именно про это или это скажешь чесно когда реальные характеристики токого не позволяют делать как это делают в ЛО. я считаю это багом и многие тоже так считают.

Post #6 of Thread

Безусловно, засмеяли бы. Ведь гораздо проще и главное - естественнее, сидя в кокпите, набрать sudo apt-get install make или что-то в этом роде. И к тому же, набрать это гораздо быстрее, чем щелкнуть мышкой. Ирония не к линуксоидам, они все-таки люди адекватные. ЗЫ Я перестаю что-либо понимать. И вроде не весна?

This is great news First I'd just like to say it's great to hear that ED is even considering a new patch to address some of the issues regarding LOMAC. It's a great game and this new patch should make it even better. After reading around I'm a little confused by what the true aim of this sim is, if I can call it that, a sim. On the one hand we want realism (numbers and facts and stuff), and on the other we want a balanced battle in HL between the various jets. This seems like a conflict that is not easily going to be solved. The first problem comes when we define realism. We do have some declassified information on the jets portrayed in LOMAC, but I believe there is still a lot of guess work involved, especially with regard to some of the american jets. Ok so defining realism is difficult, but we also want to have some fun playing this sim right? As I've read somewhere before in this forum, it was said that if the F15 was made into this super jet that blasted everything below it with its low down radar and AMRAAMs, then no one would fly anything else. This does make sense. However I don't agree with dumbing down the radar and or the missile so drastically that you get a pathetic hit ratio. There are a lot of suggested fixes mentioned already and I agree with most of them, but all I'm trying to say is that ED have a tough job on their hands trying to please us, the consumers. I don't believe that ED will ever please everyone, and I don't expect them to, but I'd like to say thank you for a great game and thank you for your continued support. It's great!

в ..LockOn\Bazar\world\Shapes замени kabina-mig-29g.cmd на kabina-mig-29a.cmd

Its only a Testversion - new Sign Model in Work ;).