Leaderboard

Первый ролик из серии "Веселые пилоты" Флеш-версия:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KoQ_wlbmfM Скачать ролик в высоком качестве можно тут (67 MB) Зеркало: http://fly-movies.ru/lockon/spctrailer/

[первые 15 минут просмотра] Помоему это больше на "шапито" похоже:) [через 30 минут просмотра] Че то я нифига не понимаю. [через час] с помощью зала выяснил.. гей-парад.. [спустя 1.15] ыы, начало кончаться топливо:) борты падают..загадываем желания :D [заключение (через 1.30)] Итак, массовое страдание фигней (не знаю как еще назвать), было весьма увлекательным, тупо интересно что еще случиться. Посему, прошу выложить трэк в раздел юмор :D, сам не могу, меня 2 раза выкидывало.. Организаторам отдельный пистон. организованно очень плохо, сижу слушаю жалобы летчиков, ужас.

из-за спешки, в файле readme.txt Акулы перед выходом не успели дописать фразу, торопились: "КРАСНЫЕ БЕСПОЩАДНО ОПУЩЕНЫ ПОТОМУ, ЧТО ИГРА ЦИНИЧНО НАПИСАНА НА КРОВАВЫЕ ДЕНЬГИ ПРОКЛЯТЫХ БУРЖУИНОВ ЗА БОЧКУ ПЕЧЕНЬЯ И БАНКУ ВАРЕНЬЯ!"

Прошу прощения, в предыдущем(удаленном) посте написал информацию которую не правильно воспринял. После дисконекта ведущего беркуты всей стаей сели, что было не совсем правильно, и не совсем понятно, по крайней мере мне. Почему? потому что нигде такого нету, и я считаю это простейшим неуважением к другим. Хм, переписка с одним из присутствующих подтвердила мое имхо. В соответсвии с правилами форума, я не могу донести всю яркость высказываний, посему, некоторые слова и предложения пришлось заменить.

Замечательный трейлер! Красивый четкий пилотаж, красивые ракурсы. Отличная замена пилотажной группе ЦПВЛ :( Из минусов (на мой взгляд): - перебор с тряской камеры в начале - мало :)

@ Kilo_60 My understanding is that 9.3 + do have some specific optimisations and support for the 4xxx series cards, including Win7 support. Since 9.3 ATI/AMD ceased supporting older cards than 2xxx. I see no point in having older drivers installed on a new card if there are no stability/quality issues. Performance wise 9.3 + should in many cases be faster, or at least equal to 8.12 on a 4xxx in recent games.

I beg to differ. I think it is better to stay above SHORAD and AAA and be able to spot launches and dive accordingly than to stay low and give you no room to manouver without losing speed and getting in an even bigger mess... This is more a bug than a realistic feature, especially since it is set at 10m exactly... It is even more unrealistic to engage a S300 site in an A-10. I'd say killing Osa's and Tor's with A-10's is already pushing the limits of reality. The challenge in flying A2G is not knowing what you are up against. Take a nice column of vehicles with one or two SHORADs... When you find the column you don't know which are the guys that'll shoot you. So you have to ID these first before you can use the gun on the soft targets. Killing trucks with Mavericks is just a waste. So either use the TV to ID the unit or, if you really like a challenge, spiral in slowly and ID the SHORAD the moment it fires at you.

Откатить патч можно вот как: Пуск -> Панель управления-> Установка и удаление програм Кликаете по Lock On и выпадет окошко,с вариантами удаления. Нажмёте "Нет" и откатите LO до версии 1.1 Потом можно легко снова установить патч 1.2b Я сам постоянно просматриваю обучающие ролики...

POLL: vote for discrete commands vs. toggle commands I wish I could issue a HOTAS command and know exactly what I just asked for. IRL you'd know which position you flipped the switch but in the sim you don't. In my experience this really causes a problem for me with autopilot. There are many other instances also such as weapons mode [ground moving, ect], laser standby, hover mode, cannon status, where you only know when it's too late or you looked at the button. I know this is a study sim so everything needs to be as close to reality as possible but there are some concessions that have already been made[zoom for example]. In my non-combat living room for example.....When my Audio Video remote turns on my system to watch a dvd I want my receiver and tv to go exactly to the correct inputs and not just toggle to the next input which might have me looking at xbox and listening to the radio!! This way my wife and kids can use it without calling me at work all the time. I vote for discrete commands.

Well there's two parts - there's the mechanics of flying and fighting, and there's the tactics. They really go hand in hand. The Falcon is obviously much easier to fly, but I think there's more to learn. For one thing, the Black Shark is a purely IVR platform. That eliminates a whole set of equipment and tactical doctrine. It's like flying a World War 2 fighter, except it handles weird and you have advanced technology like laser ranging and computerised targeting to make your job as easy as pointing the cursor on the thing you want dead and squeezing the trigger. It doesn't get any easier than that. While the F-16 does have visual combat modes for both air and ground targets, it also has BVR capability. To fight with it effectively you need to be proficient at both. In addition, the F-16 is a multi-role fighter. The Ka-50 is an attack helicopter. While you can use it to some limited degree to engage other aircraft, it's not what it was designed for. It's A-A weapon systems are exactly the same as the A-G systems, only it's harder to hit flying things because of their speed. This leads to different tactics, but the process is the same. The F-16 has a different set of radar modes for engaging aerial targets, and different tactics depending on range, aspect and available weapons. The navigation system of the F-16 is just as complex. I know the games don't let you modify the flightplan en route, I'm not sure if you can in real life or not. Even assuming not, there are plenty of pages on the MFDs relating to test modes and system parameters that I've never even touched. And the problem reporting is as detailed as the EKRAN. (And why would you memorise the codes, anyway?) Certainly I find the F-16 easier to fly, but it's a war machine and flying is only a small part of its purpose. Actually fighting with it I find to be far more complex. In addition, much of learning to fight with it is book learning and theory. The Ka-50 tactics you can learn a lot through trial and error. While that's not a viable strategy for real pilots, it does make it much easier to pick up and learn for simmers/gamers.

Yeah, really impressive 3D model! BTW is that the new DCS standard, I mean, it's not even flyable so how do the flyable planes look like?!!

Я могу переозвучить если дадут текст на английском, правда я пока понятия не имею как изобразить кавказский говор на инглише :D

You're joking right? The f16 is so easy to fly, it practically flies itself. The cockpit is straightforward and the avionics were designed to be easy on the pilot. Everything was designed so that the pilot can concentrate on one thing and one thing only - combat. Bombs even release themselves! Compare that to the BS.... have you navigated your ABRIS and GPS systems? How about setting up waypoints? Have you memorised the EKRAN codes... or what the ARK-22 does? And if we were to compare flight models of the two.... lets jut say that apart from trying to fly a heli, which is a lot harder than a jet, the actual flight model of this game is still ahead of the F4:AF. I'm not knocking F4, I loved the sim. I bet everybody in here loves it... we're all simmers if we're here. But DCS:BS has set the new benchmark. If you're gong to compare it to Falcon, the only one that I would compare it to is OP.... and even then only for the detailed avionics. The flight model is still F4.

When your engine's (or APU) are running and you want to talk to the groundcrew, you need to switch the radio selecter to "ground crew" on that rotator button. its the rotator button right below the engine-start selector. ##: See post below from Viper

Definitely ;) It's amazing how quickly you learn to swim when accidentally landing in the Deep End of the Pool.......:)

"Передо мной" только пара бессмысленных фраз.

Не эта ссылка? http://lockon.vniim.ru/

In this post you can download the track (externals only) of the same display, flown at VFAT 2008. Here you can download the live display as it was filmed at the VFAT2008 In the attatchment you find the demo track used for this movie with internals, crash included :joystick: :D Edit: Track has been removed.

Господа, я вам как офицер запаса танковых войск, имевший счастье послужить в полку постоянной боевой готовности, а потому вдоволь настрелявшийся, могу доложить, что из современного танка можно не только в вертолет зависнувший (либо летящий во фронт) с двух км попасть, но и в отдельно стоящий карандаш с трех километров. А современные танковые прицелы позволяют в автоматическом режиме даже поправки на ветер учитывать. Не говоря уже о российских танках, имеющих управляемое вооружение. Так что сбитый в треке вертолет - это нормальная практика. И в этом случае спасет только маневр. А если наводчик грамотный, то только складки местности.