Leaderboard

1.1.1.1 is still not good enough,i think i will pass on this one.

He has been taken care of. Damn rookies!

I'm pretty sure it would have. ... because clearly the guy at the controls hadn't been taught to fly an aircraft. I could've done it better than him, and I've never flown an airbus. I did simulate what happened to them in A-10C - I had the advantage of knowing what was going to happen, but I also had the advantage of knowing how my simulated aircraft flies. This comes down to training, period. It doesn't matter how much FBW you have on your plane, you should still know how to fly it.

Just a suggestion for payloads in multiplayer, maybe something for FC3. The current payload setup is a bit limited. Make it so payloads are determined and saved in the mission with regard to the following: -Give the option to lock payloads and not let the client change them -Give the option to allow only certain weapons with others being restricted that the client cannot use -bring back the ability for a client to choose any weapon on any pylon, and get rid of the limited menu system. Thanks for listening!

Thanks for the tip:thumbup:

From youtube.com/watch?v=8PmBPMWMHdo&feature=player_embedded [.YOUTUBE]8PmBPMWMHdo[/YOUTUBE] Write it without the dot

A tour in a F/A-18... Found this on Youtube... Watch this in HD. Notice how fast the canopy is dry! Notice too the second 'aggressor' style Navy F/A-18. Cannot embed the vidéo. It's a 'non-shared' one. Just click on the link...

Personally, my "Breath Holding Moment" during this OPFOR was when RED (Zoky) took out the three ships (HVT's). That was just freaking awesome considering the BLUE fighters were close by. I guess BLUE never really recovered from that initial shock. My initial reaction to that was this :shocking:. It was something that I always dreamed of doing. It was just bloody brilliant from my point of view.

While I agree with you than in many cases missiles were wasted needlessly ... I'm not sure what it is you're expecting from a bunch of people who don't regularly train together, comms are spotty, and planning probably isn't all that clear. Further, I'm not sure why you're expecting people who do this as a hobby should be doing any better. Depends on what the ping of your target is, and how much jitter he's got. There can be things done to change this and make missiles deadlier against such opponents, but there are some tricks that the fuzes deal with in MP where they cannot quite keep up in SP. That's silly. Why not join in and fly your own plan? Just agree with the others on what you're doing. All you did was miss the opportunity to show off your stuff if you're that good. You don't need regulations to make tactics more important. Bring good tactics, you'll end up giving the other side a bloody nose all the time, and they'll either sit up and notice and start working on their own, or they'll just keep being missile bait. Or maybe you'll find your tactics aren't so good after all. Who knows?

Не понял при чём тут Ка50-1? Разговор идёт за Ка50-2. И там я однозначно говорю: вертолёт в симе не соответствует реальной FM. Я решу эту проблему следующим образом: 1. получу реальную или виртуальную инструкцию вертолёта Ка-50; 2. облетаю эту модель с помощью некоторых прорех в лицензионном законодательстве DCS; 3. выдам свои рекомендации по корректировке FM сего вертолёта в сей реализации сима.

Hi Tito ! I did not quite understand what you meant.

Wondering if a list exists that details interesting targets to attack defend on BS games, you know electric power generators, Dams if any, nuclear plants, refineries...

You can't??? Shit, someone better give the guys in the United States Air Force a call and let them know that, might also be a good idea to give the US Navy a call to and let them know as I know 100% that both Arms fire 120s and go defensive before it goes pitbull.... granted not with every shot but it does happen. Borchi for someone who has little to no combat experience in MP Lockon you have a lot to say ... In between your trolling posts have a look at this video mate ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgS7z6iaS3U and since you clearly have no idea what it means once you have watched the video check out this page and look up 'cheapshot' - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brevity_code No one said it did and I agree with you all the way, and as you correctly pointed out 3Sqn do fly with 8x120 I've seen it many times although I will concede you guys do carry 7s more than we do... sadly however this too doesn't make you 'good' either I see some very clever flying from 3Sqn, have done so many times I really rate you guys but as I'm sure you appreciate Cali there is no set rules for an engagement what works in one situation might not work in an another.... sometimes trying to be smart gets you killed and if you don't take your shot your going to end up with an Eagle screaming up your 6 inside 10 miles. Contrary to what this post is turning out to be (a bit of an attack at F-15 drivers) not all of us 'spam' and run, yes many do however without blowing my horn to hard I've been lucky enough in the past to be the victor against many lone wolves and squad members using 'their' tactics because 'my' tactic which involved not spamming worked! Yes there are certain F-15 drivers that will spam on you at 20 miles then run away (a certain 'Germanese' guy for example) I don't rate this tactic at all... waste of time as you spend all your days RTB'ing..... but not all of us fly like this. You can't get kills on the 'good' guys in Lockon by Spamming missiles. It is incredibly easy for anyone who knows what they are doing to NOT get killed by someone spamming in an F-15... to put it bluntly if you get killed by someone firing 3-4 120s on you from 20 miles.... you don't know what your doing and its your own fault your dead. The main thing the 120 gives the F-15 is options... the option to fire at range and factor this into your fight is one of them, sometimes I'll happily waste a 120 with a 25 mile shot with a low PK just so it goes active on him and he reacts then I push in on him for the kill while he is dealing with defeating that 120 which is easy when its fired from 25 miles but it means he is not just flying hot at me.... Your a fool if you dont at least 'consider' that option, you don't always have to take it but its there and it works. On that note before anyone jumps down my throat... in over a year of playing Lockon I have yet to meet someone who does not fire on me inside of 20 miles but manages to evade my missiles... get behind me and kill me.... try that shit with anyone who knows what they are doing and your going to die.... if my missile goes active on you and you have not fired on me I'm not going to be flying away from you I'll be closing the range as fast as I can to kill you. I'm in favor of restricting weapons for future events I think it would make things more challenging however this OPFOR had NO posted weapon restrictions so if people wanted to spam actives that was their choice. I appreciate you have stated a few times Borchi that your not attacking anyone however it seems to me that you are grossly unqualified to say some of the things you have.. believe it or not MP and SP are very.... VERY different ... Fair enough if you were a well known Lockon 'ace' in the multiplayer servers I and others might have a bit more time to consider what your saying however your not.... you flew in an event that was 8vs8 years ago with your friends... thats about it frankly... you have no idea what your talking about

Нет, не надо ставить никаких галочек. Не надо возвращать все как было. Есть новая информация, более правильная, корректная, вот и надо ее внедрять в симулятор. Я считаю все Вы правильно делаете уважаемые разработчики и тестеры. :)

Качну-ка и я, пожалуй...

Скачал видео. Посмотрел. Полёт 90 градусов боком не увидел, максимум 45-50. Взлёта юзом также не наблюдаю. Похоже на первоапрельскую шутку.

я думаю не в том дело что теперь "правильно" или "неправильно" а в том что "мы привыкли к этому" а вот теперь "все не так" нужна просто галочка в меню: [v] вернуть все как было особенно удручает что сначала портим отношения с пользователями коих и так не много, а потом удивляемся почему продажи низкие.

Сравнение Ка-50-1 и Ка-50-2? Для меня, нет. А сравнение с РЛЭ Ка-52. Вообще не корректно. Вы вообще в состоянии понять, что существует огромная разницу между тем, что разрешено пилоту ЛА по РЛЭ и тем что реально этот ЛА может ?

fixed that for you...

Пановэ, так как облетать ЧА2 сам не могу, то помогу чем смогу. Выкладываю типовую документацию по облёту Ми-8 по программе №1. Полагаю, что украинский язык не станет препятствием для понимания. Для приведения документации в соответствие с техническими характеристиками Ка-50, необходимо заменить граничные параметры вертолёта в соответствии с РЛЭ. Т.к. РЛЭ Ка-50 у меня нет, то выполнить эту работу, к сожалению, не могу. 2.Облет за програмою №1.rar

http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=662637&cid=7 — 2 new Mi-26s arrived at Russian Far East. The fourth new Mi-26T transport helicopter build by Rosvertol Corp. for Russian Air Force in 2011. Rostov-on-Don, 12/03/2011

There never was a v2.0, thats just the name of the new Black Shark. And going from v1.0.2 to v1.1.1.0/v1.1.1.1 was imo done to better illustrate the compatibility with DCS A-10C. Not that any of the numbering matters anyway.

@dragon ...hm than it's rollback-patch :)

There is a portion of the video that shows the F-22 mounted on pedestals for testing. I learned today that this is how they check the RCS of the aircraft, and they test each aircraft before it ships. Not a single one has failed in the last 100 ships.

No.

@ the DEVs: we have some good resource in our squad from luftwaffe guys and well what would be cool to have in FC3 would be the deactivation after 3 sec of the ARH AIM120 misiles after they loose a target while still on datalink to the motherplane, for example when a bandit turns away or notches. this deactivation also happens when a missle looses lock on a target when it tracks with its own radar . this is a safety setup of real life missiles. as far i can try to get some more informations if they are not classified, but about the 3 sec deactivation, i can remember in janes f15 game this was also implemented into the game ages ago. also would be cool, to have real flight models for the missiles, so that when you go super, that your kinetic energie would be taken into account to your missiles energy too. this is something real, which are tactics of the real airforces too. the r27et also needs to be handeled again, cause do to the data of its flight characteristics, after burn out it deaccelerates at a such huge ratei in the sim, that it is compareable to a brickstone in the air, cause the g forces according to the data, are close to 10gs, which means that it slows down way too fast, in comparrison to the aerodynamic airframe of the real missle which is simulated here as a 3d model, but it would be cool to have some real behavior and no parachute at the six of the missile when the rocketmotor burned out. also, a datalink to the r27er and a tws for su27, simutaneaously lock on 2 birds, and for the mig 29 too, would be nice to have too. also a time to impact, as far the su27 and mig 29 have such thing, but i guess they do, when they have datalink in real life too, but if you like i can get in touch with the luftwaffe guy ior ask him if he iswilling to give informations to you guys, as far possible. some other stuff is allready said, like the tracking at the rear hemisphere and also the autoswitch from radar to eos, which is by far not realitic, regarding to our source, who worked allready on the mig29s which we sold to poland :-) these are a few things which would make the skys of FC3 way more interesing again and closer to reality, which would bring back many pilots who fly dcsa10 only now, i guess. hope you guys might think about such thinks. if you need more information i am willing to ask the guys of our squad who have a deep inside to the real things, if they are willing to get in touch with you guys or even can. if you need such people, just pm me and i can pass that on to the guys of your interest. cheers borchi

well it has passed some time since then. i do not know which event it was. it was a locerf even back in the old fc1.12b days. i flew together with tomcatz in a su27 so it is at least 2 or 3 years since i last participated in such event. i remember that in the first 30min the server crashed like 2 times or so. even 2 other squadmembers flew at the locerf, raven and maverick i guess. but too much time has passed since then. but a reason why we did not participate such events in the past was such mindblowing misslespamming. what we actually thought of, would be some coordinated stuff in addition with aci or gci . we have some guys who do that for living in the luftwaffe, and it is interesting when you are directed by real gci guys. you feel that you are actually nothing more then a tool. no freedom like most of the times when you fly without them. you are just there and do what they say. and employ weapons, or when you are lucky he says, free to engage and you are cut loose, but as far you first have to id, do to ROEs, then you are still under control of some other dude :-)

I don't know why they ever got rid of it.

Selected Course Steering. Can be selected ON on CDU ATTRIBUTES page. You will notice a straight line going from SCS point on TAD then. You can change the line's heading by the Course knob on HSI. Attributes set on CDU ATTRIB page are applicable for ADI steering bars. Generally that is all you need to know about SCS to employ it. :)

OT but that shouldn't be happening.

The Georgian Pravda is propaganda in favour of the Soviets, hopefully there will be pro NATO news reports in the future. Contained on that site is the current front status and the daily news archive. It's hard to reveal too much like inventory etc. without ruining the mystic and enjoyment for all involved. Squad status and pilot stats are an interesting idea but we're trying not to create too much competition here rather focusing on running an enjoyable campaign. Hopefully more information, a form of stats, etc. can be released in the future. I can't stress enough my thanks to those few that put a lot of work into trying to make GI work, not just the campaign itself but by making strides to improve the mechanics of running such a beast. http://www.51st.org/campaign/?act=trailer

I just ordered some spare "F5" keys...

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about... or choose to act silly.

I must be getting better at DCS, since I understood what most of those changes mean! :) http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/downloads/patches/dcs-wh_patch_1.1.1.1_en/