...

+1

No he encontrado tutoriales prácticos en castellano, pero en la guía del supercarrier hay bastante teoría y gráficos de referencia. DESCARGA: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/downloads/documentation/dcs_supercarrier_operations_guide/

After using ACM. The radar is locked to 5 miles, in MED mode, with no possibility to increase the distance range and other parameters. To return to full radar functionality, A / A mode must be disconnected and reconnected and the preset in (SET) is lost.

Thank you.

It works well for me. I only lose targets in multiple bombardments due to group dispersion. When the bomb arrives, some targets have changed positions.

Do we know if there is a program to fix ACM and vertical scan on the Hornet this week?

It is impossible to make an exact calculation of the distance traveled by the missile without knowing the time from launch to impact. Either way, you are right, it would be stupid not to recognize that if the missile is launched from a distance of 60 miles, you have to subtract the distance that I have traveled towards the missile.

Thanks Bignewy for the reply. Is that after the last update? Clean install and this is what I see:

It's very simple. A year ago I could tell you that the UH-1H gunners had SEAD capability with the minguns and I could provide you with a recording track to prove they had that capability. However, a clue shows that it happens, but does not prove that it is correct.

A year ago at DCS UH-1H gunners performed SEAD better than HARM and that doesn't mean it was correct.

Whether the failure was the missile or the radar is irrelevant. I stated that the AMRAAM operated by the Hornet in TWS mode was not hitting the targets. Your arguments were to say that this was not true and that I was completely unaware of the manual. Finally, other similar reports supported my initial position.

The F-14 in my video does not attack at maximum speed and altitude. It attacks at 50/60 miles at a speed of Mach 1.0 and 30,000 feet. If you represent a different scenario, you are not matching the situation.

This is starting to remind me of when you denied that the AMRAAM operated by the Hornet in TWS mode was failing, while it worked correctly in the rest of the modules that operate it. Finally time proved me right. The F-15s also didn't fly without both wings. Finally time proved me right. We can go on, but I don't feel like it.

There is no need for tacview. They are pure mathematics. A missile launched at 60 miles maintains a speed of Mach 5 throughout its range, otherwise it would not have hit 9 seconds after entering active mode.

My video is not a demonstration of skill. The defensive tactic hasn't been the best, but the purpose of the video is not to tell everyone, OH, I'm a super driver who does everything right! According to the data, the Phoenix hits us 9 seconds after going into active mode, at a speed of mach 4.8, traveling 8 miles at 1,600 meters per second after having traveled an additional 50/60 miles.

The proof is in the video. The missile hits me at a speed of Mach 4.8 traveling 8 miles at 1,600 meters per second after having traveled more than 50 miles. At the time of impact, the F-14 was still 30 miles away. That means his attack was between 50/60 If you can count, count 9 seconds from RWR alert to impact and calculate time, distance, and speed.

Certainly, I didn't even drop the tanks because I planned to keep fighting. I didn't think anyone was going to shoot from 50 miles, or sooner. It has not been my best evasion maneuver either, but it is proof that here is a weapon that needs revision, capable of traveling 60 miles at mach 5 without losing energy and activating its radar 9 seconds from impact against a target at 95 degrees, mach 1.20

QT-33A: Maximum speed: 600 mph (521 knots, 965 km / h) at sea level

We did calculations and to get to us, after going into active mode and after RWR alert, it would have to travel 8 miles in 9 seconds at mach 4.8, 1,600 meters per second. All this, taking into account that the missile has been launched at 60 miles. Regarding the approach speed. At the time of the radar alert we were already at 45º with respect to the enemy. At the moment of impact we would be at 95 degrees, descending and at 1.20 mach

Thanks for the information. So if the missile becomes active at 8 miles, it goes one mile per second, given that the alert on the RWR is 9 seconds before impact.

I am not going to intervene any more in the thread nor am I going to argue with the entelechies of the simulation and the people who make their living from sales. I will accept the opinion of someone who really knows the behavior of this missile in real life. In the meantime, enjoy your anabolic suppository.

Do you know why you say the missile is activated at "some distance"? because you really do not have data of the real distance to which it should be activated. 9 seconds before impact doesn't seem very real.

This is how someone who is under the effects of placebos behaves. That's what we can laugh at I would not like to be in your place and be another victim of self-deception.

None of us are pilots, we can neither affirm nor disprove, but receiving an RWR alert 9 seconds before the impact of a missile that already has 60 miles traveled does not seem very realistic.