...

This explains it all. Thank you.

I think they did not understand my question, perhaps I have not expressed it well. I have no doubts about the basics. contacts that have the radar disabled are not displayed in the DDI, so they cannot be designated. That's what I mean. You cannot designate a contact if it does not appear on the DDI. They are displayed as a data link, but cannot be designated.

First of all, thanks for the interest, but I think that you have not understood my query. Can I silently lock on a contact that is on the data link, but has its radar turned off? The intention is not to use ACM, or LHAQ, or AACQ, but to perform a silent block so as not to put the enemy on the defensive. This is possible?

Is it possible with the Hornet to make an attack in TWS mode against a contact that has its radar turned off? Thank you.

Queremos compartir este paquete de ocho unidades personalizadas de la FAMET, que mejoran las texturas por defecto. https://launionescuadron.webnode.es/uh-1h/

They almost sent me to the stake for defending the theory that AMRAAM is less effective in the Hornet than in the other modules. But to be honest, I have learned to live with it and currently I am getting good results, yes, with high exposure and at short distances.

Toggle waypoint for ground vehicles. I want to bring the bases to life by adding patrols without having to put hundreds of waypoints from A to B.

communication shortcuts with artificial intelligence appear to be failing.

Am I the only one having problems with the HMD and the AIM-9X heat sensor? 90% of the time the heat sensor does not enslave to the target heat source even in dogfight within half a mile. Before answering yes I use the lock / unlock action. Thank you. In previous updates it has worked perfectly and in others it has failed. EDIT: I have moved the thread here because I inserted it in general questions.

Am I the only one having problems with the HMD and the AIM-9X heat sensor? 90% of the time the heat sensor does not enslave to the target heat source even in dogfight within half a mile. Before answering yes I use the lock / unlock action. Thank you. In previous updates it has worked perfectly and in others it has failed.

Same problem here. I thought it was a problem with my modifications but I see that it is a common problem. Thanks for contributing.

I think the visors on the Hornet's racer helmets were broken in the last update. I'm not entirely sure, I'll do a repair to confirm. Missile impact sound has been fixed.

Two years ago today an update brought an overly glossy paint for the UH-1H. They never listened and they never did anything. I'm afraid this time it will be the same, we will have the rocket pods without paint for a long time and I hope I am wrong. This has become: Pay for a product and solve the problems yourself.

In a thread about errors in infantry behavior, BIGNEWY said that it was being worked on, which was reassuring. However, it would be nice to receive more details, a preview, a progress report, or something that gives us reason to think that the wait is worth it, whether those improvements are at a functional level, or if they are improvements that also include better graphics . The UH-1H doesn't make much sense without a working infantry.

+1

I was out of DCS for two months because my joystick broke, but I will be ONLINE again on Sunday. I spent five months trying to buy a VKB to no avail, because they were out of stock and I gave the X-52 a chance. 104TH is still the best server. Very grateful to be able to participate.

I did not explain myself well. I also have this bug, which was reported in the general UH-1H forum a week or two ago and moved to this 3D object section where it is less visible. I also have this error and it is quite annoying.

There was a thread on this very thing, reported a week ago. They moved it to the 3D objects and textures section.

Do you question my willingness to have a VKB on my desktop since before the summer? https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4436371&postcount=46 Answer: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4437112&postcount=47 I recognize that I am slow in making decisions when it comes to an investment, but you cannot question my willingness to have a VKB on my desktop, if it is not available when I want to buy it. In any case, the difficulty of accessing the product since July and that you have questioned it, has helped me make a decision. Good Morning.

I am seeing that there is no stock on the European website until November. So I have several doubts. In case of placing my order, for example, on the 10th, when would I have it at home? And given the difficulties in accessing the product, I wonder what the return and refund process would be like in case of technical problems. I've been trying to have a VKB on my desktop since before the summer.

I understand then that Windows will recognize the device immediately and using the additional software is optional. I also understand that functions can be multiplied. Thank you very much for the reply.

Will this device be configurable from the DCS controls configuration panel without using additional software, or will it be necessary to download existing profiles? As I do not speak English, it is difficult for me to access all the information. Thank you.

I have the same problem.

Nice work with this texture.

found that the tracks work well while keeping the original view. Without touching the external views or altering the playback speed and the cockpit views, but I don't know if it happens in all cases. Playing the tracks while keeping the original views works for me. I hope I can help