...

A QT-33 and a BQM-34, they are not an F-18.

Those who come to my gym and gain 8 kilos of muscle mass in a month also do not recognize that they receive supplements. I can't provide a blood test to prove it, so I assume my claim is sterile.

Self-deception. This missile was not designed to hit a defensive F-18 at 50 miles at speeds of Mach 1.2. Do you want to fool yourself? You feel good? Congratulations.

They can fire 70 miles, but they won't hit a defensive aircraft at mach 1.2. Launched 70 miles, it could take down a C-130 The perfect self-deception.

For God's sake fix this, there are people who shoot at 50 miles. We've been with this for a long time. This missile model in DCS is galactic.

Any news on the state of development? It would be nice to have more frequent information. Thank you.

Thank you very much everyone for the responses. Series 30 RTX is not compatible with my motherboard.

+1

I'm sure because they are the manufacturer's specifications. My PC is a compact, an MSI Aegis 3. Some of its components are adapted, such as the MSI Trident X. The MSI Trident X uses smaller adapted components. These types of computers are difficult to update, so I do not recommend their purchase.

I would like and also I think they will be well priced, but it would be incompatible with my motherboard, space and power supply. The maximum I can mount is the RTX 2060 and not just any model, by size.

But as they say in that thread, if ED decides to add RT technology, the more expensive Hotas would be of little use to me, with a GTX 1060 it would not be able to process the graphics. Regarding RT technology, when the user mentions it, no one from the ED team confirms or denies it.

My main concern has its starting point in this thread, where they say that soon whoever does not have an RTX will not be able to fly well in DCS, therefore, updating the graph would have to be the priority, but if I had no doubts, I would not have launched this question. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4477237&postcount=296 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4477607&postcount=298

Thanks Rudel, $ 400 +/-

Thanks. I consider all opinions, but I do not consider the option of a T16000. Totally ruled out. If I invest in a HOTAS it has to be something of quality, not something that can break or lose precision in two years. I already had to return a $ 220 X-52 because the Throttle was not reaching full power. I'm flying at 1080 with a 144Hz monitor and I can't really complain. My doubts are the GPU and RAM. I was thinking about this, but I don't know if it would improve my experience. https://www.amazon.es/ASUS-TURBO-RTX2060-6G-Tarjeta-gr%C3%A1fica-GeForce/dp/B07MJKTS4P/ref=sr_1_2?__mk_es_ES=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&dchild=1&keywords=RTX+2060+ASUS&qid=1599470560&sr=8-2

Yes, there seems to be a problem with the vertical scan. I have been knocked down more than 14 times for not being able to get the opponent into the cannon's reticle.

I'm 95% with the Hornet. Otherwise, I would not enter multiplayer and would continue in single player until I was sure that I can successfully complete all the tasks.

By the way, I take advantage of the thread to advise against the purchase of pre-assembled computers, due to component problems, compatibility, limitations and space when updating. The question is still ongoing.

Thank you very much, my PC does not support higher graphics. It is a Pre-assembled and has limitations on size, motherboard and power supply. RTX 2060 is the most it would support. Thanks for your answer.

If you had the following PC: I7 7700 4.2 GHz 16GB RAM GTX 1060 6GB and a budget of $ 400. What would you buy? A) 32 GB RAM B) RTX 2060 C) HOTAS WARTHOG

Makes sense since I assume a landing gear break or platform collision would cost over $ 30,000 already, but as comment # 21 says, there is always the option to burn fuel I guess. It is my assumption, due to ignorance, because I am not a pilot and I do not know the procedures.

Here something identical, perhaps better explained. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=265803

Gracias a ti Spook, ya nos dirás si flotan, porque no los he probado, no soy muy fan de los mod.

Thank you. And sorry for the English, I'm using a translator and it's already an effort for you to try to understand me, something I appreciate. Yes, it seems that there are times that the sensor stops working, there is already another thread that talks about this. Thank you very much for the help. If it happens again, I'll go up the track.

I don't think you understand me. No one would fire an AIM-9X without identifying the aircraft in front of them in a mixed good and bad situation. I have to use radar to identify myself. When I say that I use TWS it is for reference, in case the combination of some radar modes, + the helmet + the AIM-9X may be causing conflicts. For informational purposes.

Here you can see the procedures that I follow, in this case everything works fine. As I say, it is something difficult to reproduce, because the failures are very occasional. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lla2oQK5BmzYFMPnNV-EyT0KCBzttBy8/view?usp=sharing