tflash

It is perfectly possible that the F-35 Thunderchief II had some difficulties against the Viper (Block 40!), but then again as said in many posts: it all depends on the software that was being tested, and flight control software in these kinds of jets is something that keeps evolving. I guess that on the basis of this report, if it was indeed the case to gauge dogfight capabilities, adjustments to the software will be made. There was a lot of positive news also these weeks about the F-35, which seems to me much more relevant: The F-35B did hundreds of operational flight test flights from the USS Wasp. In fact , this is a opening up a quantum leap in capability. Not only is there no discussion whatsoever that the F-35 is in all domains superior to the Marines Harrier it replaces (stealth, supersonic flight, range, payload, avionics, flight controls, ...), there is more: The US Navy fields 8 WASP-class amphibious ships. With the F-35B on board, these are now credible aircraft carriers able to strike from further at sea. Given that many other nations only field one or two carriers at best, the idea alone that the US Navy on top of its existing carriers will now field 8 extra ships with supersonic, stealthy aircraft capable of deep strike is shifting balances even further, to say the least. In light of that this dogfight story really does not mean much, in the first place maybe while the F-35 isn't even meant to engage in these kinds of dogfights.

Somehow I find LM's response besides the question and unconvincing. It seems to acknowledge the basic claim of tbe article: http://arstechnica.co.uk/information-technology/2015/07/f-35-project-team-says-dogfight-report-does-not-tell-whole-story/

One obvious error I made is that when I did dogfight with only heater missiles on the Mig, I left my radar on. This unnecessarily alerts the AI aircraft so they start spitting out flares.

This problem is solved; I had top delete files in my saved games folder, in particular a disabled modules.lua.

Problem solved: I needed to delete old files in my Saved Games folder. I had disabled modules from my non-steam installation.

Yes, the SAR missiles seam to have a better hit rate! Thanks for tip!

I'm doing some dogfights with the Mig-21 against AI SU-25's attacking an airfield. All armed with R-60M. That proves very very difficult! Not only do the AI SU-25's manoevre like the very best aces, they seem to be able to outclimb me in the vertical, and their flares are incredibly effective against my R-60M's. In fact, I managed to down one with the gun, but with the missiles it never succeeds, since even when they are hit, they are so rugged they just continue the fight. I myself have great troubles avoiding their R-60's however, since my flares do not seem to be effective at all: I have to manoevre like hell to get these missiles of my tail. My AI wingman is a to total failure that gets shot down every time. I must confess I'm an A2G guy, I really such at A2A. It's great fun however! FT War for airfield Mig-21bis.miz

Damn, indeed activation gone but no solution: the Ka-50 icon just does not appear and I cannot select the Ka-50 as player. What I find strange is that when I activate, the hardware code changes each time. I never changed the hardware on this relatively new PC.

See thread: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=144212 When I go to https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/personal/licensing/ I see that my steam Ka-50 license is activated for my PC; but it just doesn't appear. All my other modules work perfectly. I tried to desactivate/activate many times but to no avail. Steam does not even show the Ka-50 icon. The ka-50 folder however is present on my PC. -------------- Problem solved: I had old files in my Saved Games folder I had to delete.

JF-17 Paris air show Very nice jet:

It is so strange. I moved my installation from c:\program files (x86)\steam to c:\steam, verified file integrity, uninstalled and reinstalled the module: nothing helps. Ka-50 doesn't show up. I manually verified activation: it says it is activated on the PC. I installed on another PC: Ka-50 installs without any problem in the same steam account. Weird!

Many airforces outside the US will use their F-35 multirole, including air defense; the performance will certainly be important, e.g. in the case of Israel, which might be interested how an F-35 would perform against Saudi Typhoons and Eagles. Besides stealth and agility electromagnetic superiority will be a key factor I would presume.

Beautiful Mirage jets

Do they mount the HTS pod to be able to launch HARM missiles or can the HTS pod be used as such as a sophisticated Radar warning device?

The DLC is ticked, it has downloaded, there is however no Ka-50 icon in the main menu (so neither colored or not). The training missions do not appear, I cannot select the Ka-50 as player, On startup it doesn't ask for activation. All the other modules I bought as DLC for steam work perfectly!

I bought the Ka-50 2 DLC for steam, but when I start up the game it doesn't appear, I cannot chose it as player. I manually activated it succesfully, but that doesn't make a difference. Tried uninstall-reinstall twice but to no avail. ------------- Solved: I had to delete files from my Saved Games folder.

I find the dash 9 even more beautiful than the standard 787, it seems more balanced. Anyway an incredibly beautiful aircraft, would love to fly in it, I hope it will replace some 767's flying to Brussels.

Yes, local media in Belgium already report that Boeing has built a passenger plane that can take of vertically :=)

As it happens, the Typhoon's helmet is not that bad either: http://www.baesystems.com/enhancedarticle/BAES_157468/typhoon-helmet

The time that you just hang a payload under a pylon is long gone. Since the whole flight dynamics of an inherently unstable aircraft such as the Typhoon is managed by the computer software, every new payload requires software updates. Once you drop one of the bombs the software has to recalculate the trim of the aircraft. The Typhoon was first tested for Paveway 2 bombs, then for Paveway 4. It is that weapon that is focused on, since it has many deployment modes. Software development focused on integrating those. For heavier strike payloads Typhoon is testing the Storm Shadow missile, not GBU-10 bombs. GBU-31 has never been mentioned to my knowledge in connection with Typhoon.

F-104 backseat With nice footage of the cockpit 4:22 onwards

CAS the Phantom way

I like that bumpy nose ... how close can it get when you even get bruises on the nose of the jet? :thumbup:

Sikorsky flies S-97 http://aviationweek.com/defense/sikorsky-conducts-first-flight-s-97-helo

Debunking myths part two Did we have part two already in this forum?