Jump to content

revalence

Members
  • Posts

    309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by revalence

  1. Then... I'm wrong... It far surpasses it! And, still, there are Lock On skinners out there, you don't necessarily have to do it yourself, Tom didn't do his skins for his Kuzencow and Su-33 either. But truly, it is a very fine model. :D Cheers
  2. Congrats to you both! Happy years of marriage and flying ahead! (If that neutrality stays) :) Cheers mate, Andrew(Revalence)
  3. Wait.... Ok... read one of the comments on the video... So it is a Cannon... just a camera hooked up to a radar detector... case solved! ...The camera is STILL The camera is pointing at a mirror which rotates following a radar tracker. The mirror turns and reflects it back to the camera, which is why you see the bounce at the end. And a slight distortion from begging and end... (Comment from Youtube Channel)
  4. Hmm.... I'll have to agree with Mvsgas... rockets (what it looks like to me) travel excess 1,000 (most). I'm not sure that's possible to capture by human instinct and accuracy... The explosion at 13 Seconds was most likely the end of the rocket burn... (EDIT) Now I see it... now rocket burn at all... (Stupid me :)) However, now we have to solve the exploding part...
  5. DCS F-16 is a good choice... Widely known in the sin genre... many would flock to the sensation of the most realistic F-16 sim ever, whether it be the F-16A or Block 52/60... Plus, very lucrative choice... many countries are currently operating the F-16... Drat... all my hopes for the Eagle is gone... (Come on! 104 kills to 0 losses!) :P Cheers, Still can't wait!
  6. Awesome Combatace! So what you said was untrue- Its just as good, if frankly not better, than 3GO's Su-27 :) Cheers! Andrew
  7. No, I insist... I don't give very much of a challenge :(
  8. Haha right... I hope nobody would notice... aw well... your turn!
  9. Right... Sorry... A bit overexcited, aren't I? But thanks! Lets see.... Something nice... and pretty easy... P.S. Its not a Buccaneer...
  10. Your turn, Mvsgas! Make it easy... I can't get any :)
  11. Haha! I remember playing that when I was a kid!!!
  12. Yes... New driver released for GTX 200 Series just 2 weeks ago... Here's the page. Choose the OS and whatnot... Enjoy! http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us&ptid=1&psid=51&pid=0
  13. No... Wait... Its DCS: Predator, Reaper, and Avenger! Wow... This thread grows fast...
  14. That looks like a mod... I saw it once... But I know that's most likely FC 1.12. That terrain is Tom's Lockon4Ever 5.0 (Yes, I remember that! :D) That was a pretty good terrain... (Sigh) Memories.
  15. Most likely, yes. And remember to check for the latest driver... New one just released I think.
  16. revalence

    Arma 2

    No worries, it is. The campaign is enjoyable, and the ability to switch from an infantry to a AH-1 to a Su-25T is fun indeed! -Andrew (Revalence)
  17. But still... I really hope its not the F-16... It's much overused... mostly in the sim genre. But a Russian bird would have been gratifying to see... Oh well... F/A-18 it is! :)
  18. I resent that!:D F-15C all the way! Crossing fingers that they'll simulate F-15C Golden Eagle w/ APG-82 AESA radar! -Andrew (Revalence)
  19. http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprints/ships/ships-us/38588/view/uss_cvn-70_carl_vinson_(aircraft_carrier)/ http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprints/ships/ships-us/15399/view/uss_cvn-68_nimitz_(1975)/ http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprints/ships/ships-us/21068/view/uss_cvn-68_nimitz_(1975)/ http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprints/ships/ships-us/17411/view/uss_cvn-68_nimitz_(1979)/ I'll find more... Looking forward for new model! -Andrew (Revalence)
  20. Oh no! I thought those were just in movies!!! :P
  21. Haha right. Don't go for the Geforce 310. My GT240 is playing A-10C with medium settings well, but not as well as I like. A few hiccups here and there, playable, but very bad on multiplayer. I most likely will upgrade to GTS 450. My cousin has it, and it gives him max with 60-80 fps. Don't go with anything lower than a GTS 250.
  22. Very true. I might not be an expert on Programming nor CAD modelling, but in terms of China ever truly competing with the United States in terms of military power and advances, it will take at least 40 years or more with the United State's current unstable economy and China's drastic growth. The United States shocked the world when we unleashed formidable technology on the Iraqis in the Persian Gulf War (1991). This advance of the J-20 isn't as so alarming as everyone says. We American as just naturally arrogant. We were competing against the Russians... Guess what? We lost the initial space race. It is just like right now. We have underestimated China and India for many decades. Now both are developing weapons of our magnitude. We were "land of opportunity" 30 years ago. In truth, the world is simply catching up. Its true and clear. Also, the chances of America and China in an all-out conflict is vastly overrated. Firstly, it would be much to expensive. Secondly, it would be a political and economical upheaval. NATO, faithful to the US, would have to turn against China. North Korea would see this as an advantage, and could easily attack South Korea. China would embargo the US and other NATO countries, which would cause inflation in the US. However, with no work provided in companies that turn to China for cheap labor, this also effects China's economy. So really WAR in the Taiwan Strait= Even Hitler wasn't that stupid. So the J-20 shows that China indeed is making true advances, and in the viewing of the Chinese culture, it is a source of pride also. We cannot stop nor influence the human being. We United States citizens had our "Golden Age". Maybe its time for China to have theirs. :D Cheers, Andrew (Revalence)
  23. I can underestimate you either! I like the fourth one :D!
×
×
  • Create New...