revalence

Very nice! Is that Beta 5?

:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:

Hmm...Most likely Su-35. Beefed up version of Su-27 (In my view of things.) Russians are truly amazing!

Ok... sure... However, this post is already pretty well set already... Any moderator can delete this thread (Stupid me :D) Thanks all, and oh, LARGE, that is a aircraft I am hoping to see in the near or.... far-fetched future. :smilewink: Thanks all. -Andrew (Revalence)

Yes... this has been a largely controversial subject for many of us aviation philosophers... So, its good time that we all pitch in our own opinions... My question to anyone is... WHAT FIGHTER, in your opinion, is the most effective in A2A combat, not counting Pilot skills. Include reasons, whatnot, advantages they hold... etc. And to narrow the category a tad bit, let's stick with Generation 4.5 and below. Thanks everyone! -Andrew(Revalence)

I'm not very competent in aviation knowledge, but... I give it a shot.... Judging by the engine... and rotor, its a....Mil creation? Don't kill me if I'm wrong....:(

Great! So far, no MEinit conflicts! Thanks so much!

Awesome guys! I can see it..... Another step toward a perfect virtual MAKS airshow! -Andrew (Revalence)

Here's my contribution- http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/su-33/su-33_pictures.htm No blueprints, alas, but many POV pictures. Kinda late for work, so I'll come back and post more picts later! Anything for a new Su-33! -Andrew (Revalence)

Funny lookin' Su-27! Haha... like the A-10A... But where's the F-16? :D

Very nice details! (Darn this Rep giving system! :D) Can't wait for it! -Andrew (Revalence)

Agreed! My playing ratio from FC2 to DCS:A-10C AND Ka-50 combined is... about 4:1. I just stink at taking screenshots. Many people find the same reason, or just don't. It's as simple as that. If they want to, they do. Nobody has forgotten about Lock On (God forbid! :D) -Andrew (Revalence)

Holy crap! You have surpassed even REX for FSX! SilentEagle, your work is amazing! -Andrew (Revalence)

Very nice combatace! Keep it up! Don't feel down if you can't match the quality of some, just know that others can't model at all! (Ahem! Myself!) It's very nice progress, and we're all thankful for a Su-33! Best Wishes, -Andrew (Revalence)

Fantastic model! Can't wait to fly that bird! (If it were released) :D

I couldn't agree more!;)

Very nice screenie Dowly! Rep, and my new Alienware laptop screen! -Andrew(Revalence)

Awesome Demokrator! Rep! :D -Andrew(Revalence)

Agreed wholeheartedly! The F-15C seems mediocre when compared in turning rates to the Su-27 or MiG-29. In truth, sadly, it quite is. Although it's G-Limit is just the same (9Gs), it has exceptional thrush-weight ratio (1.12), and it has a extremely low wing loading, the Eagle is quite sluggish when maneuvering around, especially with full fuel load and weapons. In reality, the F-15C can statistically outperform a F-16Bl.52 (many tests have confirmed this), where is large and heavy predator (40,000 lbs. avg. takeoff weight) rules is really the BVR. It has internal ECM onboard, fire-forget medium range missiles (AIM-120) and it has a powerful and immersing radar with IFF, a feature missing to many Russian fighters. True, it's tactical range (counting it's range from missiles) is far less compared to a normal loadout of a Su-27 with R-27ERs, but the Eagle is a standout for performance compared to earlier US fighters. However, I really think that the Eagle isn't optimized for down-to-dirty dogfighting, because it tends to fishtail and lose more speed at High AoA maneuvers than the Su-27. Do dogfight with afterburner, and lose those fuel tanks :D -Andrew (Revalence)

Gorgeous Tom! The new environment in DCS really brings your models together! -Andrew(Revalence)

Naw.... its more like the new lighting and HDR makes the models alot more handsome (take a look at the Su-27 or something). It makes it much easier to see small minute details with realistic color and minimal performance drop, although I like the new HDR... but the fuzziness around objects are distracting. -Andrew (Revalence)

WMM is much more versatile than most people are accustomed too... It's no longer a program where you have silly titles and so forth, it is a good program to just start off any movie... and another God-given aspect...... ITS FREE!!! -Andrew (Revalence)

Ahh! Windows Movie Maker! I did a trailer with this same program.... not too bad, no music and such.... Now that I mention it, the new Live WMM works perfectly fine when making tutorials, trailers, etc. Except for fully fledged movies ( *Cough* Glowing Amraam! *Cough*) it simply doesn't have the niceties needed. However, I like to pre-render and resize it in WMM, and add text and some blur through black and whatnot to start off hassle-free (Newer movie-editing software just simply don't have old style-transitions, except for Vegas WAX plugins). Afterwards, I edit in After Effects and Sony Vegas 7. Very reliable, very user-friendly, and extremely affordable on Amazon. Plus, it has all the necessary component for stuff like color correction, blurring, lighting, shake effects, lens flare, stuff like that. Hope this will help :D -Andrew (Revalence)

Whew! Yet again, Diveplane, you continue to show your never-failing artistic ability.... in DCS! You never let us down! -Andrew (Revalence)

Love this shot! +1! -Andrew (Revalence)