Nahen

Hmmm, it's a pity that the guy didn't turn of back ... we would have clarity ...

I think someone spilled paint and they had to do something about it... I never followed it that closely but I don't think this paint scheme was ever adopted as standard for the F-15E. I'm saying in advance that it seems so to me, not that it was.

And if you insist on having it here, check if you don't have double-binded functions on this switch. This is quite a common problem with this.

Maybe just try to connect this function to another button /switch on, for example, the throttle? Generally, your settings are quite strange since you don't have trim in the place of trim ... maybe rebind everything in a way similar to the real HOTAS from F-15 and it will be after the problem? I assure you that McDonnell Douglas engineers quite sensibly thought about where what is on the stick and throttle. It is true that there is no knob on the Warthog to control the vertical position of the radar antenna, but you can safely connect it to one of the switches on the throttle.

Better let stay like now. You can always contact the owner of the server and talk if he would throw, for example, once in a while a package with liveries. If he has the will and will, he will do it. For why combine? Each server has its own discord or forum. Get along, set up a thread in which skins will be collected and update what is on the server once every six months. But this is an individual matter of server users and their administration.

So now I thought that one F-4E PhantomII is better than 48 Korean FA-50s

Perfect - Poland is half way And it hads the Phantom from a few days

When RAZBAM releases it, it will be...

When I'm sitting in the cockpit, it doesn't do me what I have paint on the fuselage and wings

The context of using a helicopter in a SOCOM operations where and when you never know what might happen.

Chill out, we are resuming the production of PZL P.11c that will successfully oppose the Su-57 :D

I'm still flying the GTX-970 and I certainly won't spend money on another graphics card before buying the F-15E

https://milmag.pl/f-4e-phantom-nowy-eksponat-w-muzeum-lotnictwa-polskiego-w-krakowie/

It's just mine But I can share it as something It's just that it has been slightly modified. I'll recreate this one in my free time and let you know. And sorry for offtop.

All in all, it doesn't matter to me and so I fly either on real colors - in the case of the F-15E only grey, gray ... Or I make individual based on real and not some colorful "occasional" ones, but most often ordinary standard, slightly modified but nicely scratched. Now I'm flying with this - The first screen is "mine" and the second is a photo of the real 172 from 493rd 48FW from Lakenheath. And I'll probably do the same with the F-15E, I'll find a ragged F-15E and do it myself like F-15C

There is no chance that it will be a competition Unless, as I wrote, someone likes to fly in a fully lit room, or with a lamp pointed straight at the face as in an interrogation ... All "facetrakers" need a very well lit face, any shadow causes jumps, skips, positioning problems in general. All devices based on IR diodes or laser will have the advantage that after proper setting, nothing will disturb them, regardless of the lighting. Yes, extreme cases, when, for example, bright sunlight falls through the window and is reflected on some smooth / shiny surface will interfere with work, but these are some extreme individual cases.

Two days ago, the F-4 Phantom E probably went to the museum in Poland in Krakow. Is Heatblur preparing a promotional campaign?

Was I right?

I assume that the vast majority of people have families, do not live alone and this is reason enough to use headphones. And besides, when you play with headphones, you definitely "hear more". Anyway, if someone doesn't use headphones, it's their right. So, taking the correction - anyone who plays with headphones should not feel uncomfortable because of the head tracking devices attached to them. If someone does not use headphones, let them get tired of "face track" inventions that will never work like any devices based on IR diodes or laser. For obvious reasons, I omit virtual reality goggles. So you had a misconfigured software for the device. That's the idea behind Track IR and its likes, to configure movements so that minimal movements allow for the full range of cockpit view. That's why, for example, when I fly PvP, I never fly in VR goggles, only on Track IR. This gives a huge advantage over goggles - but it's definitely not real. If you configure the software correctly, the range of head movements should be limited to about 10-15 degrees of movement to the left / right and up / down, which is quite comfortable and does not require a "turning the eyeballs"

I assume that each of us uses headphones when flying in DCS... So we won't get rid of it anyway. And if so, devices weighing 100-200 grams, mounted on headphones, are not a problem. I gave up the battery in favor of power supply via the cable, because I have a headphone cable anyway, so I don't mind the other one "connected" to it. I'm wondering whether to mount the diodes themselves in the HGU-55 replica as well as the headphones and cables and all put in the pipe from the oxygen mask. But It's just that I prefer to fly in headphones than in a helmet

For $35, you can have a ready-made headtracker kit based on a PS3 camera and IR LEDs. It works perfectly, I dare say after about 3-4 years of use that it is as good as the original "Track-IR" You have two versions of the power supply - a cable via the USB port or AA size batteries. Instead of tinkering with some inventions, it is better to buy something like this or find someone who will build something like that for similar or less money. I tried some "face tracker" once, it's a waste of nerves and health for lamps/spotlights shining straight into the eyes - every change of lighting caused a problem. Not worth it. I know that there will be a lot of people who will defend such inventions ... but probably only someone who has not used the original Track-IR or such as the self-made one I described, may claim that it is not worth spending such money. I wouldn't spend money on the original Track-IR either. I to this day spent it on Thrustmaster Warthog and Coguar sets, T-16000 set plus Oqulus goggles. Enought. The original Track IR costs about $250, and this costs the same as the DCS module - $35.

Stilll waiting

I had so much fun from this in F-15 Strike Eagle III from Microprose And then in Jane's F-15E