Jump to content

Nahen

Members
  • Posts

    756
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nahen

  1. We don't make clickable F-15C, we don't make clickable machines only "air to air" like MiG-29, Su-27 because it's boring ... But we do Chinnok, which in a very exciting way will be able to transport from point A to point B cargos, soldiers ... Hell, even the UH-1 gives you more options Who needs it?
  2. Everyone was excited about the movie - me too, THERE WAS F-15E and OH-58D I'm waiting for them for a long time and I will wait until the end and F-4 - and at the end of the year it will turn out that only Chinook will come out By the way - we don't make clickable F-15C, we don't make clickable machines only "air to air" because it's boring ... But we do Chinnok, which in a very exciting way will be able to transport from point A to point B cargos, soldiers ... Hell, even the UH-1 gives you more options Who needs it?
  3. Guys, chill out, we've still been waiting 10 years for the F-15E... so what's the problem with waiting a little longer for the F-4?
  4. I see that, apart from obvious sarcasm, even the icon at the end is completely incomprehensible to some...
  5. I suppose that these three displays are so crammed somewhere in the code that it will be hard to change their parameters.
  6. I'd love to see the end result - the most annoying thing is the backlight at night. It's just that it would be nice to tone yet down the RWR, RADAR and MFD displays themselves. Because at night they blinds and the most and disturb.
  7. Confirmed info on the release date of the F-15E: It will be released when RAZBAM releases it. If anybody don't believe me, not my problem
  8. I admire people who, not being interested in something, not using something, have so much free time that they comment, discuss what they are not interested in in any way... I wish I had so much free time...
  9. In two weeks like F-15E???
  10. I don't lose anything, the opponent loses all these machines most often Nothing amuses me except the F-15. That's how I am. If the F-15C FF ever comes out, even the F-15E will be put aside
  11. Nahen

    F-15E vs. F-18C

    The F-15 is better than the F/A-18 in SEAD missions... you know why? Because these matters are handled for him by the F-16 And he's definitely better at it than the F/A-18 The F-15 doesn't have to be better at low speed maneuvering why? Because if someone during the fight has to maneuver in such conditions - it means that he is a fool and can't use the advantages of speed and height
  12. No matter, I'm still looking forward to it even if it's next year To this day, I only fly the F-15C and only it. The bought MiG-29, Su-27 and AV-8B lie somewhere under the dust. I don't fly any of them. From F-15C I will only change to F-15E or F-15C full fidelity if be.
  13. Oh <profanity> I missed the premiere!!!!!!!! what will i do now??? WDW please save!!!!!
  14. Two weeks after the new year... 2024?
  15. Nahen

    Release Date?

    What is the relase date of the DCS Forum Posting Dictionary?
  16. All in all... today on the PvP server in the chat there was a question - how do I find an opponent? In fact, I shouldn't be surprised anymore
  17. Isn't that obvious? An aircraft that was created on the basis of a fighter by strengthening the structure and allowing it to attack ground targets would be a rather strange construction if it could not be used for dogfighting...
  18. And here's a fresh video from Lakenheath Happy New Year everyone p.s. With CFT tanks
  19. Nahen

    F-15E vs. F-18C

    I've never understood NAVY pilots... what's the point of taking off and landing from a piece of wobbly boat in the middle of the ocean... Can't take off and land from airports like normal people?
  20. The F-15E is no different from the F-15A/C in terms of the number of weapon pylons. The airframe itself can carry A-A armament on four points under the wings and four at the edges of the fuselage. The F-15E additionally received a CFT mounting system that increases the number of suspension points by another eight suspension points dedicated to the A-G armament. As for the A-A configuration, both without CFT and with CFT can carry 8 missiles in the same places. With this configuration, the CFT omit the extra three pylons on the sides of the CFT plus one between the "original" A-A pylons. The whole topic was about the possibility of removing CFT - yes, but until this year no F-15E flew "operationally" without CFT. Even when they flew in A-A configuration they always flew with CFT. After the decision to withdraw F-15C from the linear units, at the Lakenheath base the F-15E began to fly more often in the A-A configuration without CFT. After the outbreak of the war in Ukraine and the replacement of the 483rd Grim Reapers to the F-35, someone decided that the typical air superiority fighter may still be very much needed, and the F-22 is not enough to be everywhere. Besides, the advantage that F-15s have over Su-27/30/35 and MiG-29/35 is so big that they will be enough in case of escalation and the need to gain air superiority over Europe. Coming back to the issue of CFT and A-A configuration - the F-15E with and without CFT can carry a total of 8 A-A missiles suspended in exactly the same places..
  21. All these planes were flying with cft at the time No, they all flew with CFT
  22. I think that when the "C" began to be withdrawn, someone noticed the fact that it was the basis to dominate the aviation of Russia during a possible conflict. F-22s alone may not be enough, especially since there is no point in sending F-22s against Su-27/30/35 or MiG-29/35, it is better to use them against AWACS or MiG-31s which are not dangerous in themselves but their missiles can be a bit of a problematic. In my opinion, in the event of a potential conflict, an aircraft such as the F-15 in the A-A configuration will be very much needed over Europe.
  23. ITS TRUE, TRUE Search here, besides what I sometimes see with my own eyes on this channel there are a lot of videos from recent months from Lakenheath https://www.youtube.com/@AviationInAction June this year: https://youtu.be/2iqXzRQPNNw?t=3879
  24. Everything changed when the F-15C from Lakenheath was withdrawn... Since then, often and more F-15Es from 492nd and 494th Squadrons fly without CFT. It seems to me that often mainly planes from the 492nd fly without CFT in "air to air" configuration lately. So if razbam will ever release an "upgrade" to the more modern F-15E, maybe removing the CFT will make sense But now for me today it still doesn't make sense
  25. I think best move be in the future make all modules from FC3 as full fidelity. Great day be when full fidelity modules of MiG-29, Su-27/33, F-15C can meet with others FF modules in virtual sky... This is my little wish and dream.
×
×
  • Create New...