PLAAF

Anyone love those jets from the 60s? Both sides of the Cold War tried everything in their research to get ahead. Many interesting and sometimes weird designs were made. Yak-28 design is interesting, weird, exotic, mass-produced, and most importantly, served in Eastern Germany, flew in the sky of Western Germany. It would be a perfect addition to the upcoming Cold War Germany map,

Ok, finally, let me add Yak-17 as well.

OK, I forgot the F9 as well. Over 1000 were made and were the only carrier-borne jet fighter in the Korean War, I think. Think about it, we are already getting the F4U and A-1; the MiG-9, F80 and the F9 will complete the Korean War.

What about the Canberra bomber?

I heard that we are going to get Me-262. So, on that note, how about MiG-9, Yak-17, IL-10, F-80 and F-9 as well? All were used in the Korean War. https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11177380

Silver Dragon's roadmap says it is going to be a G-8 variant. Does anyone know What's a G-8 variant? It's not in Wikipedia.

We need those.

I don't get it. Shouldn't ED have more data on older jets like the F-22 and F-117 to produce a true FF module? Why not go after those instead? Please don't tell me DCS is going to turn into another warthunder.

I don't get it. If ED doesn't have enough data to make F-35, why push it??!! Why not go after F-22 or F-117? I am sure they can get enough data on those older jets. Unbelievable. So our DCS is going to evolve into another Warthunder? That hurts, that really hurts.

If not J-8F, a later production of J-8H is good too. And as far as I know, J-8Hs have retired before the F variant.

As everyone has heard, China just revealed two 6th-generation prototypes along with the new KJ-3000 AWACS and Type 076 carrier on the 26th of December, Chairman Mao's 131st birthday. So, what secret is there in an old 3rd gen fighter like J-8F? @uboats @L0op8ack Please ask the Chinese military, I am sure you will get permission to make J-8F instead. @uboats @L0op8ack Please say "yes" and make me the happiest man on earth.

any update?

There is no specific variant as far as I know because everyone bought different variants. So in that sense, the J-7E and J-7G series have spread wider. But then again, they also have their own sub-variants which different nations had bought differently. But if Deka wants to make a J-7II module, I wish it was the F-7MB since it has a better RWR. Alternatively, the final J-7IIM variant is good too.

If you want the most widespread variant, the J-7II series is the one you want to go for.

I found this picture, it showed that Chile's F-5 has a refuelling pod. I heard that ED is making a 2.0 version of the F-5. Can we please have Chile F-5E Tiger III upgrades as a part of the 2.0? Thanks for your consideration.

The PLA Navy is retiring its Ka-28. A lot of them have been given to museums for free. If Deka decides to make it a module, it will be the first Anti-Submarine Warfare helicopter in DCS. https://club.6parkbbs.com/chan1/index.php?app=forum&act=threadview&tid=14622106

Any news?

What about CCRP?

Since this is a prototype plan, I wonder if we will get prototype PL-3 missiles.

If not, they can just give us J-8T. J-8T's cockpit has been known to us for a long time. I would be happy if we could settle for a J-8T.

Since years ago, the Chinese military had announced plans to retire all their 2nd and 3rd gen fighters by 2024 or 2025. And a few days ago I found this news article. It stated that J-8F, the best combat variant of J-8 has retired. For the entire J-8 family, only the J-8FR, the recon variant will remain in service for a few more years. Hopefully, that increase our chances to get permission from the Chinese military, so Deka can make J-8F instead. https://www.sohu.com/a/800755369_121118978

All J-7 will be retired this year. Hopefully, Deka can make the J-7G module afterwards.

It has been a year and a half, they must have done something.

We have PL-5EII already. But it would be great if we get PL-5B, C and E.

That's what I have been saying. We definitely need a MiG-19 version of this campaign.