AvroLanc

No it won't. Still realistic for a Spanish Hornet (although the rest of the aircraft isn't equivalent to an EF-18, but anyway). Also, sort of authentic for a USMC Hornet.

Mo410, are you in any kind of formal contact with ED at all? This functionality is critical and would represent a huge improvement over what we've got. I think the problem for ED so far has been a lack of documentation/SME clarity, but with some of your input on a formal basis it might clear things up. Thanks. Fingers crossed.

Yeah, there's something weird going on because my radios and exterior are now WAY too loud, while other sounds are about normal.

I found the audio issues related to my speaker setup. Changing the speaker detection from 'AUTO' to 'STEREO' in my case solved the radio volume issue.

Yeah, makes sense now. Thanks.

Yeah OK, further testing shows it is in. Although it’s not as ‘stabilised’ as I was expecting. The sensor image still drives forward at own ship ground speed I think, so it’s still a bit of a pain to TDC slew. On the plus side, I’ve discovered that the MAV seeker can be slaved to the HMCS LOS. This works well and can be useful without relying on TGP.

Indeed. Just wondering about others experiences with Maverick since the patch.

As per Wag's video - Did Maverick space stabilize function make it into 2.7 yesterday? I can't get it to work with DMS forward long.....

Read the patch notes. I think this has correctly been changed in 2.7.

Oh yeah sure. I kinda meant that, without the TRIM CB reset modeled in sim, what's the point of bothering to add detail to the emergency trim at all? Otherwise, HB have half-modeled a system. We need the Circuit Breakers - there's only 5 (or 6?) - functions added. Your scenario sounds plausible.

+1 For working TRIM CB. Still can't reset emergency trim. I see the preview 2.7 patch notes includes a fix for spring load function for Emergency Trim, but without the ability to do a CB reset, why would anyone want to use emergency trim?

Gents, it gets worse....Discord comments suggest VS mode not planned at all.... Why have complete standard radar modes not been considered yet? They are not data restricted nor hard to get info on.

Sure, Terrain Avoidance is all I’m referring to. Thanks.

Ummm....hope this doesn't mean what it implies....

.

Terrain Avoidance mode hasn't yet been implemented. It's not any kind of terrain 'following' mode though, more of a secondary confidence cross check. If we are to get a true simulation of all the basic radar modes then it should get added at some point. However, it's not explicitly on the roadmap, and the total lack of any comment from ED staff when the subject gets raised concerns many of us.

The NAV and TAC Bank angle limits for coupled mode are completely independent from the bank angle used by FD mode. FD can be set to either 30,45 or 60 degrees on the stores page, and these override the NAV mode limits.

Edit to opening post....I'm aware that there were 4 hostiles contacts that may have taken up all 4 RWR slots and prevented the friendly ones. New track has 2 hostiles and 2 friendlies (also they're not MIDs capable, if that makes a difference, shouldn't though). But incorrect behavior is still seen. Thanks. SA Friendly RWR bug 2.trk

A bug has been introduced with the Friendly ID RWR indicators on the SA Page (and RDR page). The SA page RWR yellow triangles correctly appear for hostile contacts. However, no matter what the setting of the 'Friendly ID' (Friend ID / No ID / None), friendly AI spikes now never show. The same applies for the repeated info at the top of AA RDR page. This used to work correctly. I'm not sure when it got bugged, most likely last OB update. Please see track where rightmost 2 contacts are Friendlies and produce EW page spikes, yet do not produce SA page yellow triangles. Again this used to work correctly. Thanks. SA Friendly RWR bug.trk

Again, not wishing to pick apart a unreleased feature but when the CPLD mode is selected in combination with AUTO and a SEQ, the HUD should show CPL SEQ # (where # is 1/2/3, depending on Sequence). Wag's video showed 'CPL WYPT' even when in auto seq. The bottom right data block should show a SEQ lateral deviation (nm) as well i.e '0.6S' when in AUTO SEQ. (It correctly does this when a CSEL is made, but should also do it in auto seq.) Thanks.

I assume it's due to the fact some user's HOTAS's TDC don't have the ability to hold button and slew at the same time.

Many thanks! Will give it a try.

Are the kneeboard docs / checklist available outside of the Training missions and how do I find them? Thanks.

Already been asked, big fat NO.

Ah ok. Nice to know it’s coming.