Logan54

Also asked Road map at RU thread, also no answer Seems ED doing this bc a lot of ppl want too muck one time and think their ideas better then other ppl ideas))

Возможно, имеется в виду что нет реализации этой необходимости, и люди читерят. Особенно зная, что зацепят тросс 100%

Немного добавлю от себя. Я не пилот Хорнета, но даже я знаю процедуру посадки с дачей РРУДа на макс тягу) Как то при просмотре видео от людей, которые летают на Хорнете ну очень много по сравнению со мной, я увидел посадку при РРУДе на минимале) ну и сделал замечание, на что мне начали отвечать что при незацепе можно уйти и так, и вообще я все придумал и форсаж только жрет топливо и на посадке это вредно, ибо при уходе на 2й круг останется меньше топлива, и что я вообще в Хорнетах ничего не понимаю, ну вы поняли) Вот это реально нереалистично, когда игрок может летать как ему захочется и не париться о процедурах) К слову, после того как я скинул видос реальной посадки, с макс РРУДом, спор почему то прекратился))

1) Иметь возможность использовать группу СКП-11+Камаз+ТЗ без необходимости быть размещенными на площадке. На данный момент возможно организовать только при наличии группы в зоне площадки (пусть и невидимой). Хотелось бы чтобы данная группа была автономна, могла управляться игроком и заряжала/заправляла в поле без необходимости ставить по пути следования невидимые площадки. Возможно просто позволить обьекту "невидимая площадка" быть прикрепленной к юниту СКП-11. 2) Добавить обьект "мина" в наземные юниты.Таким образом, можно будет минировать по триггеру "обьект в зоне". Это будет новая задача для вертолетов.

Flown on Su-33 with full loadout (a lot of bombs and S-13 pods) so it provide also big air drag (33-34 tons total) I pushed stick up to 4.5-4.7G . This mission on Nevada map. If MiG-25 is able to do this moves with his heavy weight (34 tons) in close dogfight as wing supporting more maneurable aircraft....wow. Tacview-20230601-062622-DCS-Neveda_training.zip.acmi second track with MiG-25PD mod Tacview-20230601-092951-DCS-Neveda_training.zip.acmi

interview with a former lieutenant colonel of the troops Air defense of the USSR. There is a lot of unique information here (from real life experience) ED can use it or contact with him.

This is really what I want from DCS: not spiner dogfighter, not hi-tech but big and powerfull spaceship that will have old and pretty avionics, some uniq amo and that will look like dinosaur that will land and scare all aircrafts on the stand That will be Dodge RAM1500 in jets world, all will respect it and want to hear sound of your engines) Officially half of my time I fly Aerobatics Online server and mostly in big formations, so would be cool to see MiG-25 formation in DCS some day...dreams... PD has IR scaner so you will be able to lock target and it will not hear any warning) But radar will be also good to use. PD has modified radar that able to search from 30km till 50m height never say never who knows how they fought against F-4/F-15/F-18/other ships in Egipt and Persian Gulf) But as for me, I just want to feel this big and heavy elephant, to feel its engins and check all systems. Quantity of versions (PD/RB/BM) seems not te reason not to do them) Even on Enigma Cold War server you can`t to use amo with recon ops at the same time) Found a bit more info: Avialogs: Aviation Library - Самолет типа 02б - Mig 25BR

Absolutely crazy video American test pilot & astronaut interview

For me too This is typical "not cool options" that some kind of "Hornet users" mean . I added them just to joking bcoz this interceptor not need any of them (also gun that will add weight) I hope now you understand) But anyway, need to show to ppl that this is not usual aircraft)

1 more video about Foxbat&Eagle confrontation And a story that I not able to see Eagle vs. Foxbat: Samurra Air Battle | Nebula

Yep, I mean that, when I did that picture May be "avionics" not right word wor this) Some special command channel as you said "воздух-1" more right word) Wow, never seen this tactics b4, awesome! Seems to me it will work good against coordinate enemy too ) bc if they use grinder, MiGs can use it too, but not so intensive) I know about recomend speed 1.5M for better speed up rockets, and seems to me this way really worked good bc enemy not expect you so fast) He even not changed his direction) But tactic is really good. The main difference is MiG-25 have cruise (economy) speed 2M and more Absolutely true, 1 task jet for 1 task, seems like plan Also pilot must to understand how altitude affect on engines power and fuel consumption. Not easies way after 4 Gen jets) Seems to me MiG-25 will add so much new tactics combinations if we would have it) and 2.6..2.83 limited by 15 mins, as u can burn in the sky) This is a bit joking at typical 4Gen mulirole pilots) yep, I forgot about "RedFor"

I painted an easy chart that can help ppl to decide if they need (or not) MiG-25

Very interesting to know more about radar capability, I read in wiki, it could track 6 targets at the same time, but could it to shoot 2 targets at the same time or only 1? also interesting about GCI channel that provide automatic aiming on target. And someone told (not you) about bad bombing acuracy, bcoz it should be from high altitude and need to set target point b4 flight. What if target was enemy RW or strategic objects? Too silly to spend special supersonic 500kg bombs to shoot near tanks), was it bad to strike from distance outside the SAMs zone and safety back to airfield? Seems not so silly

Доброго времени суток! Интересует возможность привязать кнопки зума на мышь. Везде можно, а на 21 нельзя...можно ли как то этот вопрос решить? Оч неудобно когда нужно что то настроить в кабине переключать зум с джойстика.

I did, thanx for info

Foxbat is awesome on 3d) like real one) and now we can find that it has cooler radar then MiG-23 and also can be commander aircraft. Seems like a DCS dream I completely agree with you ...but nobody angry about MiG-21/MiG-19 or even MiG-15, so where some reason that Foxbat will be bad fighter?Specific fighter

Seems more like as Mirage F-1 bcoz each variant has different cockpit and diferent weapon equipment) we need it to check)

Officially Foxbat has very bad turn rate. At 600-800km/h it has 55 seconds for full turn or 6.5 deg/sec(on ground level). It's really not a close fight dogfighter. But anyway, this not stops me to want it in DCS . Seems it must be hard to fly it, may be some kind of spacesip. All that it can mean, that it will really jet for thoughtful flight, and mostly for pilots that like to cruise on speed) Like Harley Davidson bikers

Right now I read practical aerodinamics of MiG-25RB(shared earlier) and there I found very interesting supersonic air intakes work, seems there really not easy to use engines, a lot of info need to know to use this high altitude fighter. Supercool if we can to use it) There info about engines need less fuel at speed more then M=2.0 with AB. This is not as we usually see

When I fly Hind I usually do strike ops, yep possible to use it as cargo/troops heli, but for this ops we usually have Hip. We have Viggen, it also good in strike ops but too bad in BVR, it even can`t run against Fishbed or Farmer, but is it bad aircraft in this way?) Anyway I understand that Foxbad will not too popular in mass, as many other modules in DCS, but who knows, who knows) Typical CW is Tomcat at 40.000ft that intercept all that he see, noway to intercept it (for me), this is why we need Redfore interceptor) OK guys, sorry me if I m too much want this one in DCS

У меня он не работал (если ты про статик)

Can Hind shoot ATGMs to 10km as Apache? Has it FLIR or guided pilons? Hind has another philosophy, is cheap, fast and works as hammer, but is it bad? So If we will have Foxbat, It will use GCI that give him commands (real Foxbat receive GCI commands in aircraft control system and can to aim right on target w/o pilot). As it has powerful radar and IRST that distinguishes IR signature of person on the ground, It will see much more tactical information about battlefield. This is not autonomous jet concept, this is complex includes GCI+aircraft. No reason to loose in this way.

я и сказал "воткнешь трамплин" имея в виду уже готовый Вот такая площадка, но кроме Виггена туда ничего не посадишь, а хочется сделать тренировочную базу для развития своих навыков, перед тем как сесть на авианосец, я заходов 20-30 сделал) Полезная вещь.

А никто и не просил делать полноценный комплекс НИТКА. Вопрос был за троссы которые можно воткнуть на аэродроме (и не только на аэродроме) и потренировать посадку. добавляешь трамплин и вот тебе нитка. Я нашел для себя такую площадку в Гудауте на востоке от полосы, на стоянке. Длина около 400-500м палуба авика 300м, соответственно это очень подходит для тренировки, но не хватает тросов

Данный обьект позволит не только готовить летчиков, но и использовать такие ЛА как Хорнет, Ф-15/Ф-16 и любые с гаками на дорожных базах(площадках подскока с перезарядкой), с уменьшенным пробегом, учитывая реальность данной разработки, почему нет? В эту концепцию добавить такан и вообще превосходно. Практично, увеличивает тактические возможности самолетов не имеющих тормозных парашютов.