Doughguy

Oh i was just taking a break but working on it. Gatherin reference like a magpie. But dont be stopped @SAB0T.. the more the marrier. Just be aware that the dora cockpit is full of mistakes. The leather is was mostly black. Late war doras even had the side walls of cockpit unpainted. The instrument gauges were also all painted black cept markings and the oxygen gauges.

This still seems to happen, or happen again @NineLine

Try with mouse clickin first. I fly the anont pretty regularly and have no issues really.

User error..... If your engine is running, check that all cbs are pushed in. Then turn on the top switch. Wait until all 4 mg151 lights are on. THEN turn on the lower switch. Red lights come on for mg131. Open safety cover. Fire. You have 2 buttons to use. Fire inner wing cannons plus mgs And one for outer cannons.. you can manually lower your pov via camera controls. You can upload a video, no track needed.

i dont really follow what your problem is... if you want unlimited ammo, you can set this in your game options and enforce this in the mission editor. its not the module....

I think what they miss is that actually theyve used the work of modders in their videos and modules... So what impression does that make? Yeah. Shot in the foot. We'll have to stick to textures with skin disease.. And as you said... that encryption is just as good as some internetpages blocking rightclick....

ww2 isnt a priority. never was. the team is small and it takes long. which is fine with me. the f35 is sort of just a questionable choice really, with ed going into a more "speculative" direction, whilest, e.g. the me262 were put on halt, due to lack of documentation iirc, and similiar arguments bein raised against other suggested a/c. ww2 dcs is just nieche. its so nieche that basically are all related in here or know each other over someone else. its not profitable enough. hence you dont see as many ww2 modules. the other thing is that obviously dev time for a module is long and arduous. so having a small team and low yield in revenue results it less planes because not enough interest / money etc etc.

i guess no more livery contests then, at least not in the way ED is currently dealing with things. Pity. Games stay alive due to mods.

and https://discord.com/channels/542985647502393346/1328012547848278067

Again, it didnt die on me since the last update for quite a while. 2 times now. And both times, i ran it at 2500 rpm. Before the updates, the bug appeared more often. I fly the D9 basically every day. So yeah, its rare now, but still happens. I dont even use mw50.

Check if you have double inputs in controls

Check Special Settings in Options menu and if you have auto rudder and / or take off assist enabled

Link kommt per pn

Hallo Zitrone, Schau doch mal bei den Stick and Rudder Friends vorbei. Wir machen viel Propfliegen, aber auch Jets, Helis und zB. Kunstflug. Auf 4ya Project Overlord fliegen wir auch recht regelmäßig. Jeden Donnerstag finden bei uns zB. Rookie Flights statt, wo wir Basics, Formationsflug, Taktiken usw durchgehen und üben. Daneben Workshops für Flieger jeglicher Art und auch CoOps mit anderen Gruppen und auch Kooperationen mit der Open Flight School. Der Spaß liegt bei uns im Vordergrund. Keine Zwänge, Hierarchien usw. . Schau einfach mal vorbei. Link zur HP findest du unten, sowie weiterführende Links.

The Dora Engine is still bugged. It just died for me for no apparent reason. https://1drv.ms/u/c/153140320d8bd7a3/EWErDnXQhVNBnOdQR4DzuQ0BPu3zGvFkg7RcUcSA_Y2gGg?e=JexmQw Track. Engine warm up as per manual, climb with 3000 rpm, 400kph, then cruise at 7k at 2500rpm. after a fight, with no noticable damage, i started to climb again, from roughly 2000 when suddenly the engine simply sounded like its got no more fuel. all swell. power drop, engine stopped, THEN oiltemps went high. Made a belly lending after few mins of flight and only then right before touchdown the coolant started to evaporate... Its getting frustrating, that this plane has had its engine bugged and "fixed" 4 times in a row now and its still bugged.... dcs 2.9.11.4686 @BIGNEWY @Hobel dcs.log

By track he means a file from within dcs. A track/replay file can be saved when you quit your singleplayer session and is automatically stored when you play multiplayer and contains eg all your inputs and meta data. A youtube video doesnt help.

That doesnt change the overall factual reflectiveness of a material, or to determine, how said material should reflect. There is a huge difference in the quality of reflections the DCS anton displays, and any of the other warbirds.

Happy new year to the Ugra Team, the above problem still exists..

It would be rather advisable, to get another axis plane next... we have 5 allies planes plus subvariants atm, and 3 allied in the making. Or, a late war map, to actually fly these planes where it would make sense..

I guess the confusion stems from the fact that the front tank holds 230 liters and the rear 290liters. The way i remember it to work is that if you have set the fuel selector handle to auf, indeed both fuel tanks are drained, however, as the rear tank holds more, the excess is bein pumped back into the front one. So until youve drained 60+ liters from the rear tank, fuel is being lowered on both tanks, but only rear one shows a change. As "auf" drains from both tanks both pumps should be activated. If you access the tanks seperately each pump needs to be activated in conjunction with the corresponding pump to avoid air bein sucked into the system. The later point is not simulated and is the same in the anton. You can leave both pumps, or all 3, on all the time. However the d9 manual describes the fuel management in 3 places and it varies partially...

I bet those warbirds still have wartime perspex installed.... hence bein totally accurate... also while he has a 190.. but all other warbirds do not. Please keep your snide remarks to yourself if you cannot be polite.... Also you didnt seem to understand an analogy nor can you produce any counter proof, yet you ask for evidence.... But as we're at it, why dont you show me nick grey in his 190 a8 or d9? So we can "assume" where they got it from.... and if murky is correct we change it on all the warbirds yes?

Canopies are present in above pictures.. I can tell by the shape of the frame of the 190. Most ww2 pics will be taken from outside. But if you compare eg contemporary inside/outside pics, you can draw conclusions looking at ww2 stuff, which tbf, isnt too different clarity wise. Also, german cockpits werent painted light grey but darker medium grey rlm66. That wouldnt reflect.

Only pics of inside a fw190 i could excavate. Bit of a dud. However, compare pics of inside a f16. Reflections are crisp, basically only reflect the brightest parts of the surroundings and still are transparent. Canopy geometry is quite similar towards the rear in a f16 and fw190. Its all murky in the anton....

Materials are simply setupn wrong on the antons canopy.

Pictures from inside are rather rare. Iirc i have one or 2 in my japo books onnthe dora. Whilest my posted pics do not show this, they clearly show how reflective and transparent the canopy material should be. And it also doesnt matter if its viewed from the inside or outside. The material remains the same. Only projections of reflected objects will differ. In the case of the anton i guess ed simply reused the front of the plate as a back plate to save pixelspace on the texture. Hence you can see it on the anton but not in the d9, cause everything from the plate forward is identical in both a8 and d9. What makes things sour for me are not reglections per se... but that only one module is affected rendering it basically useless.... so axis has effectively 2 capable planes... allied have 5. Why wasnt the glass of the other planes changed aswell then? Such adjustments should be done across the board... perspex will be perspex and will ot be different on a 109 or a 51....