

=BoB= David
Members-
Posts
67 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About =BoB= David
- Birthday August 2
Personal Information
-
Flight Simulators
DCS, Xplane, Prepar
-
Location
Czech Republic
-
Interests
Aviation and technology
Recent Profile Visitors
-
Radar elevation way too sensitive on button
=BoB= David replied to raelias's topic in Controller Questions and Bugs
@BIGNEWY Still not fixed... -
-
RAZBAM Situation Post Archive (will be deleted)
=BoB= David replied to Rhinozherous's topic in RAZBAM
thats a BS.. it's lying to customers, the customer buys it with the understanding that the module will be supported and further developed,but well.. it's not. -
RAZBAM Situation Post Archive (will be deleted)
=BoB= David replied to Rhinozherous's topic in RAZBAM
of course it's possible, but I doubt it's true, these conditions are dictated by the platform owner in most cases. -
RAZBAM Situation Post Archive (will be deleted)
=BoB= David replied to Rhinozherous's topic in RAZBAM
Its not, but nevermind, have a nice day. -
RAZBAM Situation Post Archive (will be deleted)
=BoB= David replied to Rhinozherous's topic in RAZBAM
Did you read my comment? the question was how the hell is it possible to sell it under the given conditions, because a normal person simply does not have the stomach for this. i know several multinational store owners (even in SW) and they would never in their life sell an unfinished or unsupported product because they don't have the stomach for it and have some respect for the customers. The fact that some standardized framework is being developed does not justify or excuse the fact that it is still on the e-shop under the given situation -
RAZBAM Situation Post Archive (will be deleted)
=BoB= David replied to Rhinozherous's topic in RAZBAM
Hi everyone, I've been thinking about this for a while and I have no idea what to think about it, so I'd like some feedback from the people responsible. We all know that the situation between RAZBAM and ED is tense, given that the lawyers have it in their hands now, it could be for quite a while, and at this point it doesn't matter if RAZBAM or ED is to blame for the problems, we've all read some "statements" from both sides and it's up to each of us what we think about it, but... How on earth is it possible that the F-15E is still being sold, it's a very unfinished module with a really uncertain future, and ED is acting like nothing happened, the module is still being sold on the eshop and there is no note or disclaimer that there are some remaining issues. How the hell is this possible? The concept of "respect for the customer" is unfamiliar to ED? Just cashgrab as much money as possible and be cool and pretend everything is fine, meanwhile releasing modules that won't be finished for another decade? The fact that the F-15E is still being sold under the current circumstances with no further comment on the progression of the cause for months is really a huge spit in the face of the customers that really boggles my mind and there really is no intersection here for any sane person. As I said above, problems can arise between business partners, but then it is up to the platform operator (in this case ED) to take sufficient, pro-community steps. However, in this case, apart from one statement and the offer of a refund (even for store credit, not for actual currency, which is even legally actionable under the circumstances under some EU statutes as far as I know), it is just one big joke, especially seeing that ED doesn't give a damn about customers, given that 15E is still on the eshop. I hope I get a reply and it doesn't get deleted. I'm not aware that it would break any rule. your until recently loyal customer David -
+1, definitely, I posted something about 24s back in time also, but well... Priority is somewhere else it seems.. If there is even some "priority"...
-
=BoB= David started following Radar elevation way too sensitive on button and A-A Radar strange jumping detection BRICK
-
Radar elevation way too sensitive on button
=BoB= David replied to raelias's topic in Controller Questions and Bugs
@BIGNEWY Any news regarding to this topic? -
Radar elevation way too sensitive on button
=BoB= David replied to raelias's topic in Controller Questions and Bugs
This seems like same issue -
Radar elevation way too sensitive on button
=BoB= David replied to raelias's topic in Controller Questions and Bugs
@BIGNEWYIs in DCS folder any file, which describe convertion rates / sampling, I dont know how to call it correctly, of these inputs? Can you send me your file? Or name of it, I would try to experiment with it? -
Radar elevation way too sensitive on button
=BoB= David replied to raelias's topic in Controller Questions and Bugs
Attaching logdcs.log -
Radar elevation way too sensitive on button
=BoB= David replied to raelias's topic in Controller Questions and Bugs
-
Radar elevation way too sensitive on button
=BoB= David replied to raelias's topic in Controller Questions and Bugs
I don't, I will make video if it will be helful, but @Archer.xd managed to replicate this issue.. -
Radar elevation way too sensitive on button
=BoB= David replied to raelias's topic in Controller Questions and Bugs
Hey guys, A while ago I reported on discord bug of controls issue on F-16C and P47 (other topic) about rate of some controls. https://discord.com/channels/542985647502393346/1193250513689530509 Track is self-explanatory, just to be sure - I binded controls of keyboard to eliminate HOTAS etc.. Radar elevation is not able to set at specific altitude and jumps about 15k ft for 20nm and zoom level of TGP jumps for 2-3 zoom levels instead of 1. Module is unflyable for me in every situation when I need radar (which is almost every situation), and this patch did not fixed it, I demanding quick hotfix or atleast some walkaround (and no, I will not bind radar elevation on axis, other modules as far as I test it works fine). Like I said, module for 60usd is unflayable for me for two months now.. Few patchs back it works good and without such a big jumps... Thanks. f16_tgpzoom_and_rdrelev_rate_2.trk