Jump to content

ANDR0ID

Members
  • Posts

    130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ANDR0ID

  1. Thanks ok... M134 (even M2/M3 as pictured above) would still be great & welcome as plausible options that would greatly expand the modules playability and ability to be used in a wider variety of mission scenarios. Loadouts can always be limited by mission designers if needed, but I'll continue to advocate for giving players more options.
  2. I suspect the CH-47 will be all or nothing with community scripts like CTLD... it will work as it does with other modules, or if there a major changes to DCS which cause CTLD to stop working, then all modules will likely be impacted, not just CH-47.
  3. Its a bit ambiguous given the listed version but having AAR mentioned on the store page... I hope we see AAR probe and AAR refueling as an option that can be toggled via mission editor settings at some point down the road (as is currently done with the UH-60L mod).
  4. Multi-crew as an "after early access" feature was confirmed in the latest newsletter. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/newsletters/b0645e569f63d5af7be9f706788fefe7/ Considering every other helicopter has multicrew, I think its reasonably safe to assume we'll see player controlled door guns as an option.
  5. @prestonflying I updated my pull request on github to include a profile for the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding it.
  6. I do think a flyable Mi-26 in DCS would be fun.
  7. @michelip @Pumba298 The link to the latest version of Armed Blackhawk (now v5.9) is available at the top of the user files page (https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3326421/) This link should also work for the UH-60L discord where I more often discuss updates, etc.: https://discord.gg/8erxFUMXZh I'm intentionally not posting the google drive link here as it changes with each update and I will probably not update the link in this thread as I do with the above.
  8. Would be a welcome addition to the Mi-8 in DCS
  9. Too bad this is still an issue following the latest update.
  10. Are you running the latest version of the mod from the github? A-29 is still working for me. I am using the extra weapons sub-mod for it too, but I don't think that is the reason mine is still working. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3335898/
  11. If you need cams that may be tough... springs you can probably get from a local source or online. Should be about 1 3/8" overall length and 3/8" overall diameter, 4, 5, or 6lb tension options.
  12. UH-60L base should be working. UH-60L with the Armed Blackhawk sub-mod needs to be updated to v5.8. MH-60R, if using the latest version pre-DCS update, also needs to be updated. See the official UH-60L discord for more info. https://discord.gg/RuB5rXezjP
  13. It appears the base UH-60L is still funcational with the latest DCS build, for those using the Armed Blackhawk submod an update is required (v5.8) and has just been released. Please see the UH-60L discord for the link: https://discord.com/channels/776815105810759701/1037713824633077842/1243031477537603665
  14. Good to see M-60 and M-240 options.... hope we'll also see M-134s as an option, and maybe GAU-21 or M3 .50 cal, even if just on the ramp. I would also really like to see the addition of two more gunner positions (total of 5 possible) with left and right rear gunner positions as seen on some Chinook variants.
  15. Would be great to see this, and the core game supporting fire fighting missions.
  16. At least two: https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2011-10-05-THAAD-Weapon-System-Achieves-Intercept-of-Two-Targets-at-Pacific-Missile-Range-Facility
  17. I had a chance to test this a bit... adding additional aircraft shouldn't be too difficult, but for those using the universal UFC mod the PTO, etc. functions will sadly be disabled (or not work correctly) as the universal UFC project currently mimics the F18, and thus all the PTO lights follow the F18 logic too. I was really hoping we could have our cake and eat it too, but no so at the moment. Perhaps in the future with some more investigation.
  18. @prestonflying does it again! An interesting project to tackle when I get time.
  19. Is this a capability? I thought the only option was to sync with DCS, which really means the F-18.
  20. Awesome, I'll take a look. I've updated my build to account for the Mavs & sidewinders having rails, but can look to add this too... I'll be sure to credit you when I update the package on user files. Edit: I just uploaded version 2.0 to user files containing the CLSID fixes and additions from Xeno426.
  21. Thanks... I'll have to double check the missiles as I thought I had the launch rail versions, might have only done it for one of the MAVs though.
  22. More weapons could certainly be added, but my focus was on a limited section of what could be added that wasn't already present in some form... although the AGM-65 photo I have might actually be an AT-6 Wolverine? What gun pods did you try to add, but didn't work?
×
×
  • Create New...