St4RgAz3R

yep, hopes and wishes are all we are getting for the past year and so.. We would appreciate more to be done to actually resolve this

So if an agreement has been signed for at least six months now.. what prevents the razbam modules to continue getting updated? I guess someone didn't hold their end of the deal.. It's either razbam can't maintain and update their modules anymore or ED didn't pay them yet.. And we as customers are stuck here with unfinished modules and potentially unsupported modules in the future because the statement says that the will be supported in dcs 2.9.X What happens when dcs goes 3.0.X? Not looking good..Please for the sake of the customers get this sorted..

Does anybody know if the new sniper pod will have new flight and drag characteristics? As it is a lot more aerodynamic in shape and a bit lighter from the litening one i think. It would make sense to add less drag when equiped in relation to the litening

Did this make it in to today's patch? 9L said it was fixed internally and would come in to the next patch. Can't see it in the patch notes though.

Yes , i didn't see that post existed.. I see it was reported back in july 2022! Still no fix. @Hobel got it right. That's exactly what i recorded on my track too. Only flight members seem to get affected. On other flights the octagon stays on them all the time.

When designating a PDLT flight member through the HSD , the octagon that appears through the JHMCS starts to drift and lag behind the contact. That is only for flight members though. When you designate a member of a different flight , the octagon seems to stay right on that member and doesn't drift like when it's a flight member. Also it seems to be affected by distance, speed an movement. Which behavior is correct? Track attached pdlt lags.trk

I sure applaud it too. I wish more developers do like aerges did, and brought 3 variants of the same jet and now will deliver the 4th more modern one. It would be great in the f-15c too, to have both versions earlier and later and let the people decide what they want. But if that's not possible from ED's side i would surely like to have the more functionality of the newer version. People could still fly the flaming cliffs version if they like, it won't go away.

This is due to the unfortunate events we all know. It was intented during development to get jhmcs , aim9x, sniper pod ,link 16 SIT page and many other modern stuff. And if there is no resolution and development sadly comes to a stop it would make even more sense for the C model to get this stuff in order to fill the gap left by the E

Personally i am glad they are making the newer one with all the bells and whistles like link 16, jhmcs, aim 9x . It's better to have them than not at all. If you don't want them, don't use them. If they made the earlier version it would be just like making the same flaming cliffs one with clickable buttons. Not a lot of people would be interested i think. Even the tomcat would be more modern now with the B(U) version coming. And it fits a lot better with the jets we have right now like the 16 and 18 and the strike eagle as well. The ideal would be to have a wider timeline that includes both phases but i don't know if ED is willing to spend so much time developing this.

A little worrying that the A-7 was not shown at all in the 2025 video. Maybe it's too far beyond than beyond still yet..

Is it gonna be this hour mark?? The suspense is building up..

Seeing the progress made in the coming mig29A, i would certainly ask for a full fidelity F15C built from scratch as well, surely not a remastered FC one , especially now that the F-15E seems abandoned and it's future unclear. I don't know if there any limitations in documentation etc but ED should really think about it seriously. I know a lot of people would want this. Maybe it is already planned and we'll have a hint in the 2025 and beyond video.. who knows.. fingers crossed!

As a result of this you neither can use the A-G radar modes when in A-G master mode because the radar defaults to AGR

This is true but when you heve no air to ground weapons and you go into A-G mode the FCR defaults to AGR and the SMS page in ccip where you can't change it to ccrp because you have no weapons and so the FCR can't be changed to GM or other ground radar modes. Is this limitation in IRL too because it seems odd that you can't use the ground radar in A-G mode and can only in NAV

I tested to see how the lock behaves when switching from MRM mode or NAV to dogfight mode and although now there is no relock and the transition happens seamlessly, when you try to manoeuvre the aircraft the lock gets stuck in a fixed position in the HUD and then drops. If you get a lock from an acm mode from dogfight mode itself it retains the lock as usual even if you manoeuvre the aircraft. It seems to happen only when you have an STT lock and transition from MRM or NAV to Dogfight mode. dgft lock.trk