EchoOneOne

The font looks terrific because they used wrong references. Any video recorded by onboard AVTR/HI-8 tape recorded will have stretched interface.

Releasing it in this format only hurts the community. You could have developed a method for encrypted viewing of the model in the model viewer and then released the full version. Another "feature" released to "fill the hole".

It would be nice to see english betty. Polish MiGs had her.

It will be encrypted. Such a shame.

Will Barracuda be able to create a firing solution for electromagnetic threats? This is one of the most important features of it in real jet.

I can't understand why ED even specified what block and timeframe the F-35A would be. This aircraft is enough of a frankenjet in real life. Block 4.1/.2 airframes fly with 40P01 software that was meant for IOC Block 3F. If Lockheed itself does not have power over it at times, why should ED do so, especially given the lack of public documents and information about the fat amy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 35A is already ongoing software upgrade to be capable of employing legacy HARM on external STAs.

Also super limited on the FCS.

Sorry for derailing the thread, but what is the point of developing pre-IOC block?

RAAF

This photo confirms that 4 decoys can be mounted.

I completely agree, sometimes the lack of chocks is problematic, e.g. during alignment

I think the team should consider some kind of public board like Trello that shows the team's priorities.

You do realize that many people use this simulator for serious flying where checks matter? In that case I don't know why FF aircrafts are developed.

It's been a long time since this proposal, and it still hasn't been implemented. The funniest thing is that I managed to mod it by adding a few lines in LUA, in practically 5 minutes.

This is not about "extra off", they simply need to be turned off for certain reasons, mostly because of MX safety.