Gierasimov

Could be coming to DCS:

Very interesting comments by Wags in the recent interview - some quite cool ideas about the remake of Nevada map. Obviously NOT confirmed but nevertheless quite detailed insight might indicate that ED is in fact thinking of it.

I know there was one video posted by UkrAF that featured ex-Polish Fulcrum. It was in its original camouflage light grey - as any other Polish MiG in service, with distinct blue - yellow flags on flaps and tail I have not seen or obtained any other photo.

On the other hand, in DCS, the A will be very close to imaginative Viper with glass cockpit and better JHMCS without HUD. (Single engine, same weapons, same procedures feel, even more simple startup). I wonder what ED is going to guestimate about DAS and all the visual cues.

This is easy. Amount of $$$ from A version WILL determine if ED takes on C and B versions. I would think C makes the most sense to drive more SC module sales, but as always, ED knows better.

4121 was of the Fulcrums provided to UkrAF.

@jojo - In your mission you have these advanced tasks for both tankers at waypoint 1, delete these waypoints and just give the advanced task "Recovery Tanker" at waypoint 0 already. Then it works fine, otherwise it is as you described. Here is the track of working as expected in your mission, after the change I explained above. RCVRY TKR - FROM MIZ .trk

Works for me RCVRY TKR.trk

I too would like late 90s' map but I think more important is the ground quality. I supported Sinai from the announcement and then I left it after the first major update as I totally did not like copypasta that was so evident from the up high and lack of quality down low. I will hold with my purchase before I see the map reviews this time around.

Yep, exactly. In this example my TGT and briefing values are the same, with 754 being the closest to 753.88.

They already said it is present day.

Geez! I did not realize that it was such a controversial topic and wanted to mention an 'experimental' feature I saw in a MiG video, I even did not realize it was a wrong aircraft thread. Now I feel like I kicked the hornets nest. Sugar? Poison? MSFS? OMG!

Thanks @AeriaGloria I will keep practicing, however: DTC weapon set to target location; Altimeter to target QFE ~ 754 (target at 75 meters in ME/DTC) (QFE in the briefing) 753.88. Parameters: WCS COOP switch UP; speed 780km/h, dive from 5000 meters, circle on target, hold trigger pull 4G to level, tone, separation and now: -- bomb deploys chute, then fires up booster and hit long about 500 meters; -- with WCS COOP switch DOWN the same but much shorter, far before the target, However with regular BetAB-500 LD, using the same technique as you and me describe herein, I hit that same target BANG ON THE HEAD. This is why I asked about these bombs. I wanted to know IF I AM DOING IT RIGHT. @ED -- I am not here to complain there is a problem with the bombs so, hence did not post this in the BUGS section. Why would you expect track file? I would expect you to explain how to use the weapons modeled in the game, since I could not see it in the manual. Also, I would think your standard tag is "cannot reproduce and missing track file" rather than cannot produce... unless you meant to say you cannot produce the answer to my query.

Can you elaborate a little on your tactics please ?

What do I need to do to hit intended point with the HD bombs? I tried flipping the WCS COOP switch UP and dropping them kind of like Snakes (MK HD series) but can hit the target. No wind.

I understand and appreciate your answer. Thanks!

@OnReTech nice that you are bringing Balkans to DCS! Thank you. With Belgrade's Avala TV tower being a true landmark, both visually and historically, I hope for two things: - destruction model so that NATO bombing can be recreated in a mission; - additional attention to the 3D scene and topographical quality of mount Avala and its surroundings.

Can you elaborate on what are these additions?

By the cars in this screenshot I would say 90s'; however as someone who visited Skopje this year I could as well say its 2025.

That is not what ED said in the FAQ thread. Early Access planned end of 2026

Why is the image gone now @Wags?

Right. Acmi file won't cut it as ED wants only track files. I often fight against AI so I know exactly what you are talking about, it is largely related to this feature that is in development (supposedly): https://forum.dcs.world/topic/373845-general-flight-model-development-progressany-news/

@BIGNEWY no news to share currently, not even a glimpse of hope, sir?

This isn't a bug, its WIP. That highway landing strip was actually mentioned in the latest comms from @MAESTR0. It is listed among the 6 that are coming to the map soon.

OK, back to the wish list then