Jump to content

JunMcKill

Members
  • Posts

    1091
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JunMcKill

  1. Hi Flanker, one of our strikers is not available next saturday ("FoxOne"), then "Skyhell" is taking his place as striker. Regards,
  2. Hi Flanker, sorry, but most of us will be working the friday 25th at 18:00Z, and we have a lot of differents hours, pilots from Spain, Las Vegas, Miami, Argentina and México! :megalol:
  3. Flanker, what kind of air defenses we will find? only IR like strellas, shilkas, vulcans, linebackers, tunguskas and MANPADS? Not Tor, OSAs, Buk, Roland, S-300, Patriot, Hawk etc
  4. Hi Flanker, in fact is a coalition of two squads and one pilot school, here you are: =71st= http://dcslatino.forospanish.com/ ESQ 57 http://escuadron57.web44.net/ ECV 56 http://www.ecv56condor.com.ar/
  5. GREEN Coalition: Fighters: - Iberian - Aldox - Tunther - Rush - Aleman - Enzel - Pajaron - Krypto Strikers: - FoxOne - Honos Reserve if someone fails: - Skyhell - Goldhawk
  6. Flanker one question, is mandatory that every coalition have only two strikers? or can be defined by each coalition how they will play the mission? i.e. 7 fighters - 3 strikers, etc Regards. Rush
  7. Thanks!! I will give you the GREEN coalition callsigns, to the end of this week, we are changing some of our pilots that are not available the 26th, but anyway will be 10 in our coalition this day.
  8. I think you should talk with Robert Space Industries (RSI), that's what they are doing!:pilotfly:
  9. Flanker need more info, the mission will need to SEAD? or only IR defenses will be in the OA? the problem is to assign roles to the strikers, I will need they have skills in both SU-25T and A-10C
  10. Please sign in orange or green the Pilot school =71st= and ECV56 Condor: all 10 slots ECV56_Skyhell ECV56_Goldhawk ECV56_Krypto =71st= RuSh =71st= Aleman =71st= Enzel =71st= Artillero =71st= FoxOne =71st= Honos -- later --
  11. Thanks Flankenator, give please my slot to the next in line that is not of =71= or =56= Groups, I think is Crash. Regards.
  12. Please sign in the =71st= Escuela de Pilotos and ECV56 Condor all reds: =71st= Rush (SU-27, 29, 33) =71st= Aleman (SU-27, 33) =71st= FoxOne (SU-25T) =ECV56= Krypto (SU-25T) =ECV56= Goldhawk (SU-25T) =ECV56= Rifle (SU-27, 33) =ECV56= Jackal (SU-27, 33)
  13. The difference is that F-15C have a standard system model, and in A-10C you have an advanced systems model!!, not only that things are clickable, but they do what are intended to. Both flight models are equal, PFM (professional flight model), but the gap in realism between the A-10C and F-15C in the MFD functions, weapons settings, etc, is huge!.
  14. I think ED should hire the guys of SAM simulator to include one third party module about russian SAMs in DCS. This guys are not amateurs!.
  15. Ahhhhh you save my day Cich! now is working, thank you!
  16. The bug still continue in the 1.2.8, the best way to solve the bridge stuck is taking control of the vehicle and pressing the C key in order to make the vehicle "warp" through the bridge to the ground.
  17. Hi, in the version 1.2.7 I had this changes in the mouse.lua to release countermeasures with the right button and worked perfectly: function layout() return { keyCommands = { {combos = {{key = "MOUSE_BTN3"}}, down = iCommandViewTransposeModeOn, up = iCommandViewTransposeModeOff, name = "Camera transpose mode on/off", category = "View Cockpit"}, {combos = {{key = "MOUSE_BTN2"}}, down = iCommandPlaneDropSnarOnce, up = iCommandPlaneDropSnarOnceOff, name = "Countermeasures Release", category = "Countermeasures"}, }, Now in the version 1.2.8 is not working the modification I did in the mouse.lua, and I have a new file named mouse.diff.lua, with this info: local diff = { ["keyDiffs"] = { ["d176pnilu536cdnilvdnilvpnilvunil"] = { ["added"] = { [1] = { ["key"] = "MOUSE_BTN2", }, }, ["name"] = "Countermeasures Release", }, }, } return diff I there any way in the new version to make my right mouse button release countermeasures? Thanks in advance!.
  18. meanwhile the manual is coming, could you tell me is there is a key to lock the enemy aircraft with radar search in BVR?.
  19. Any idea what is the key to lock with the new combined arms radar in BVR?, because the radar only works to search the enemy, but I'm unable to lock on him until is in visual range.
  20. Hi, one problem I found in the 1.2.8 Beta and now still cotinue in the official release, is that the option TARGET LOCK is changed automatically in the G940 to JOY_BTN3 in all the devices (Joy, Pedals and Throttle), my original option was JOY_BTN8 in the joystick, and I had to change this option when installed the open beta and now the official release. Regards, JUan Ortiz
  21. That's out of reality, vertical scan have a mode that autodetect any plane crossing the two vertical bars, doesn't matter what ED did. Even in the first MIG-29A version have this feature. In the first change log in 1.2.6 you need click ONCE the enter key and the vertical scan begin working automatic, but what is happening now, that you have to continuously click enter until a plane cross the two bars.
  22. Why we need a vertical scan that is intended for dogfight, that doesn't work unless you are clicking enter all the time? thats is 100% wrong! in the F15 is working correctly. I did the test with vertical scan radar off and EOS on first, then I turned EOS off and radar on, nothing, I turned both ON, nothing, unless you click enter when a plane cross the vertical bars. Who in ED had this brilliant idea? :cry:
  23. I heard that autolock was removed in vertical scan of soviet fighter, my question is, why the soviet planes have a vertical scan that doesn't work ?, it's supposed that this mode is for Close combat and have an autolock active (like the one of F15), in the new version you have to stay all time clicking ENTER to lock something with this mode! it is a political decision to level the game with the F15, that dont have EOS?.
  24. Nice post Wags, it ended a long discussion we had in our squad about flight and system models in DCS vs Falcon BMS
  25. Good point boquinauer, but your (our) fight against ED testters, trying to have a more realistic simulator is lost from the beginning, someone will reply you with one absurd answer that no one will believe. For example the Exocet misile that sank UK ships in Falklands have a diameter of 4.7 meters, warhead of 165 Kg and a total weight of 670 kg, the KH-29T have this parameters: Weight Kh-29L :660 kg (1,460 lb) [3] Kh-29T :685 kg (1,510 lb) [3] Kh-29TE :690 kg (1,520 lb) [3] Length Kh-29L/T :390 cm (12 ft 10 in)[3] Kh-29TE :387.5 cm (12 ft 9 in)[3] Diameter 38.0 cm (15.0 in) [3] Warhead HE armour-piercing[1] Warhead weight 320 kg (705 lb)[1] Detonation mechanism Impact [1] If you see, is more lethal than the Exocet and you will never sink a frigate in DCS with them.
×
×
  • Create New...