Jump to content

JunMcKill

Members
  • Posts

    1079
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JunMcKill

  1. The MIG-29SMT is the upgrade package for both original airframes and can carry R-77, quote from Wiki: "The MiG-29SMT version is an upgrade package for the first generation MiG-29 (9.12 to 9.13) containing many of the improvements developed for the MiG-29M. Additional tanks included in a larger dorsal hump provide a maximum range of 2,100 km (without external tanks). The cockpit features improved HOTAS-type controls, two 152 × 203 mm color LCD multifunction displays and two smaller monochrome LCD displays. The upgraded Zhuk-ME radar offers similar characteristics to the MiG-29M. The engines are upgraded to the RD-33 Series 3 that offer an afterburning thrust of 8,300 kgf (81.4 kN) each. The weapons load is increased to 4,500 kg on six underwing pylons and one central pylon, with armament options similar to the MiG-29M variant. This update is also focused on accepting avionics and weapons of non-Russian origin."
  2. Tell them to finish the thing, I'm tired of trailers
  3. The Cuban radar operators in Angola were very good, in fact the engagement in which a couple of MIG-23s managed to hit a South African Mirage F1 with an R-60 and the other escaped unharmed, according to the cuban pilot himself, the support of the Radar control personnel was decisive for said encounter.
  4. This is another kind of beast, ++++ far from the MIG-29A. Smokeless engines, extended flight range with more fuel, MFCDs with datalink and air to ground capability, R-77 and another new weapons, a new radar, air to air refueling. Ufff. Is like the SMT, the K or the Peruvian SMP
  5. If ED waits for RAZBAM's MIG23 we will never see the MIG29 this year, those guys have been in the project for years and are far to deliver. Anyway I will buy both models, but I have hope in ED to deliver this year. Everything of the actual FC3's MIG29A can be reused, why not? the cockpit is ok, only needs to change a few things, the PFM is ok, the ordnance is the same. The only real changes are in the avionics model, some HUD elements are different and that's all. For example, the SPO-15 RWR functions are different than the actual FC3 russian RWR, I hope they simulate the real one like the MIG-29 9.12 manual. By the way, the SU-27S manual is online too, and the US airforce have been using them as redfor for tears. Time to release that one too!.
  6. Just let me know where I have to pay! Looks like the version will be the Russian 9.12 (the online manual)
  7. For the years it has been in development, we can no longer call it a rush, but perhaps crawling to the finish line.
  8. Stop dreaming they hadn't even painted the cockpit and you want outside?
  9. It's a joke? You might as well post a picture of an actual MIG 23 toned down!
  10. Synonyms for Fast fast accelerated alacritous breakneck brisk celeritous expeditious fleet hasty hurried hustling lightning-quick nimble quick rapid responsive speedy swift Synonyms for Slow slow adagio andante behind creeping deliberate dilatory gradual laggard late leaden-footed leisurely slack slow-footed slow-going sluggardly sluggish snail-like static steady tardy tortoise-like unhurried Razbam's MIG-23 (They will hate me! )
  11. Hay callada por todos lados, ese es un proyecto zombie, esta muerto, a veces se levanta a ver si alguien lo mira con asombro, y vuelve a tirarse al piso
  12. At least I have the war thunder version
  13. zero $ on my side for SC, but if RAZBAM promise to release this year the 23 I'll pay in advance.
  14. This project have been renamed to "MIG-23 Star Citizen", at least one of them is in Alpha stage since ..... 10 years ago?
  15. awesome video, hope they simulate this engine particularities in the sim.
  16. MIg-23 will go out in 2023 MIG-25 in 2025 31 .... 57?!! I will be long time dead by that year
  17. Time dear OverStratos, at the most I have a minute to read how is going the development of your modules! and that's it, the last time I flew DCS was a month ago.
  18. I agree with all that you say, but I can't provide you with any reliable information of what I spoke with the pilots (former Angola pilots), please take a look at the former soviet union history and what happened to the Kursk submarine and many other mishaps. Is not me who says they covered up defects and test results, it is the protagonists themselves, the internet is full of their interviews. But please, this is just a technical conversation (and somehow regarding the history of the former USSR), it's not to warm things up
  19. I was in the Cuban armed forces for more than 15 years and all my life I have been a fan of airplanes and combat and I was lucky enough to participate in the first attempts to create a basic combat simulator (fPS of the HUD) at the end of the 80s and early 90s. But going back to the subject, I had all those manuals in Russian in my hands (and are the same ones that are on the internet today), but according to the pilots with whom I spoke, although the manuals gave those distances, in the real tests they fall below the manual specs by far (at that time Soviet scientists were sometimes forced to give data to please the party leadership) Note: compared to the AIM-7M of the 80s
  20. Amazing doc, the MLA model if by far better than the standard ML used by cuban/angolan MIG-23 in the 80s. And the R-24 missile with longer range than the 23, anyway compared with western AIM-7 of the 80s, the range of the 23, 24 and even the R-27 sucks. And I'm talking about the tests done IRL, not what the manuals said.
  21. Old pictures, I already seen them, nothing new here.
×
×
  • Create New...