upyr1

My views on variant modules are simple, while I would prefer to see the developers work on new vehicle (aircraft, tanks, ships anything really) modules, maps and assets I really don't have problems with variant modules but as I have stated before I would love to see ED set up something were a developer interested in a variant module could license existing code from other developers and offered a bundle package where you get a discount based on the amount of shared code. The MiG-21 though is definitely a good multi-module candidate

I would be fine with removing extra liveries as long as a decent generic skin takes the place of a missing livery

So far they have done the other Republic aircraft. If we get the Thud we'll just have the F-84 and F-84F

It's all part of the same process. The changes they will need to make to dcs core is simply laying the foundation. If ED was going to do a proper destroyer they would need to rebuild dcs as necesary.

The development of a naval module would be the perfect time to work on the sonar module and anything else.

I'd love to see some ship modules

I didn't say he said it was either, only that he said the Pacific Asset pack was going to be free, and I said that we might get the B-29 in it but I don't know for sure.

Please re-read my quote again, and explain to me where I said that Magnitude was making the B-29 I clearly lead off by saying I don't know what assets we are getting but the B-29 might be possible as they were used in the Pacific. Unless you know what assets are coming in what asset pack I'm standing by my statement that I don't know and there a few ways we might get the B-29

You might be wrong on this, becuse I don't know what assets are coming to DCS in the Pacific Asset pack but the B-29 would be a candidate

We might be getting the B-29, there is a Pacific assets pack in the work to go along with the F4U Corsair and we have a free WWII Marianas map in the works I'd love to know if any of the folks from ED can comment on the cost of the Pacific assets pack or what we will see?

While not the Vietnam war typhoon Cobra

I believe the statement is correct too. Which is why i say it should be on th rumor list. As the Thud had been removed from the to do list I figured that meant it was either claimed or ruled out due to lack of information. For two reasons. First simple logic. There is no reason to believe ED would remove the Thud if it's do able but no one has claimed it. The other reason is the Republic archives were destroyed https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/when-republic-aviation-folded-69197851/ Now can you think of any reason it would be removed from the list if it hasn't been claimed and there is enough data for a module?

The full quote was This statement was based on the following post Where @Hatman335 stated that Grinelli said that the F-105 was not available. So there are 3 options Someone has called the Thud ED has decided there isn't enough information the statement I am basing it on was in error

Thanks for the link, I agree something close to that would be awesome

That would be awesome it would make building strike packages easier

While I do agree 100% we need a range warning for artillery y (come to think I believe ED needs to overhaul artillery in general). The next question though is what to do when a unit has multiple gun calibers. Right now there are some battleship mods (Thanks to Hawkeye https://forum.dcs.world/profile/51395-hawkeye60/ and I hope to get some WWII surface combat vessels_ I'm thinking either color code the line. Ideally though this would be part of a massive overhaul where we could have FOs and spotter aircraft directing artillery

I know the New Jersey was supposed to use the dash during her Vietnam commission but never did.

You want a full fidelity Su-25 ? Join the club.

Agreed I would be happy with multiple maps

It might not be as complex but we did get multiple Jugs. I'd love to have multiple variants but first the question is what data still exists?

I know RAzbam had never said anything officially about the F-105, they just had a Thud on their webpage and according to the post I was trying to link to Grinelli has stated the Thud isn't available. So either ED decided there wasn't enough information for the Thud or someone has plans to produce a F-105 module, which I don't know nor do I know who might be doing it. What I do know for sure is I would put it in the rumored category as it appears the answer to the question "Are we getting the F-105?" is a definitive maybe now please point out to me where I said Razbam was doing it

I think this would be great especially if combined with a take-off timer. The problem with a public server is that there is no guarantee if a slot is going to be filled.

Vitenam might end up being huge,

Add the Thud to the rumor category

we might be getting the Thud