Jump to content

upyr1

Members
  • Posts

    4447
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by upyr1

  1. The Prowler is planned as an AI asset that will be released with the A-6E
  2. I was wrong, still want the fitter
  3. The MI-24 is still in service and there is talk about the MiG-29 which is also in service. I know the MiG-29 is the A module so I'm wondering if there is any chance for some retired 1980s version? The Fulcrum is in the planning, but I would love it if ED announces it is in EA
  4. You still have to convince Eagle to sacrifice realism in this aspect. This is one of the reasons that I like mods. There are more advanced versions of the Flanker and Fulcrum, which we can't get as flyable assets due to Russian and Chinese laws. Eagle is reluctant to do a Franken plane as it would sacrifice realism too much. So unless some political upheaval happens its up to the mod community to come up with a workable modern Flanker or Fulcrum. Though I really want ED to add the advanced variants as AI assets
  5. If you look at the Thud document info dump it looks like a third party developer is using them for a Thud module. So I think a Foxbat info dump would have the same result.
  6. That's why I didn't vote for the Fitter, not becuse I don't want it but rather becuse it has been announced
  7. When the prowler gets released, will it just be an ARM shooter or will it function as a proper jammer as well?
  8. I'm still wondering what are they planning to add from that module. I'd love to see jamming improved. As well as air defense AI. I'll be very happy if HB's prowler actually works as a Jammer and isn't just an ARM shooter
  9. In the past there was talk about an IED module that would include improved ECM and including adding ECM aircraft.
  10. It's hard to say what I want the most. I love the Grach. The fitter I believe is planed the MiG-27 should have been bundled with the 23. The 38 is barely flyable but should come with a Kiev class carrier and we need more naval assets.
  11. I hope we get the module soon I would love to fly sead
  12. I know, however I brought it up as Octopus G is working on the Fitter and the main reason people want to bring back these weapons is to give Red For players precision strike and SEAD from a fast fighter. I expect the numbers will be even lower with the right fitter.
  13. A simple "I don't know could have worked" anyhow as neither of us know what they are working on, could you at least comment on the latest version used by Russia vs the latest version used by other former WP pact members? As I have said before, this really looks like an argument for better MOD support ED doesn't have enough information to do the SM models would would have guided A2G weapons however there is a large minority of people interested in them
  14. It is good to see that it isn't going to be too hard to accurately use the E as a stand-in for the A and B bombing downtown Hanoi
  15. I would love it if ED and other developers would focus on assets that can do double duty for WWII and Korea
  16. upyr1

    ships

    Cleveland Class- make sue it has the square bridge. I want the OKC to look right.
  17. upyr1

    F6F Hellcat

    Awesome
  18. upyr1

    Vmf-214 liveries

    We might not have the right variant but that's still no reason not to have the Black Sheep How about we get both ASAP? The module needs to have some liveries when it comes out
  19. what would the 1987 fitting have been like?
  20. I wish we had an official mod repository
  21. upyr1

    model kits

    I think you need glue and paint I've got got a 1990s battleship battlegroup in the works and a Kirov
  22. How about the Su-22 variant which I believe Octopus G is working on?
  23. So 3/4 people don't want the weapons. That's a super majority. My question is which of these weapons might we see on a Fitter.
  24. So 3/4 people don't want the weapons. That's a super majority. My question is which of these weapons might we see on a Fitter.
×
×
  • Create New...