Jump to content

upyr1

Members
  • Posts

    3709
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by upyr1

  1. I am not shocked. I think Eagle and the other developers need to focus on cold war era aircraft as there is more likely to be open source material
  2. I stated the idea is that the circles wouldn't be colored all the time only when you have a unit selected. Right now we have rings around units to denote the range. null As I stated earlier the idea was only when a unit is selected but an option to show them all the time could work
  3. when we select a unit we the circles should be colored in like a trigger zone. For example the inside the minimum range should be uncolored the engagement zone might be a shade of red and the detection zone might be a shade of yellow Then if a system has multiple sensors and weapons there might be a drop down were we select the one we want. For example the tunguska would have one for the guns and one for the sams
  4. The real issue with the Vark is what version(s) do we want. I'd love to have a Vietnam, ODS and modernized Ausie. I figure the Su-24 would have to be a 1980s Fualda Gap / Afghanistan variant I don't think there is any way in hell we're seeing the Su-34. The B-1B might be possible If we get them they will have to be separate modules as they only look similar. I know we won't get the version of the B-66 I want the most except as an AI asset- the EB-66. I want them at least as an AI asset with an overhaul of the EW environment.
  5. That would be awesome. The only question I would have is if there should be a multi linugial option
  6. While I don't go online much, I can state here is what I would like to see friends' list - built in voice chat An in mission mode where all coms outside of a mission are shut down A squadron registry
  7. better yet work on both I'd love to have some WWII night fighters. I have asked for a night fighter version of the Mosquito. The black Widow would be nice, I just expect that the Mosquito would be completed sooner because of the existing module. I could be wrong, but frankly I'd hope to see two different developers work on both aircraft and prove me right or wrong.
  8. It would be awesome to have a sperate mission editor
  9. That would be awesome. As would a change every time you visit the dcs desktop.
  10. I want better mod support and a soviet era su-25. We ain't gonna get a flyablr modern Russian fighter except as a community project
  11. I'd love a check box that will select a different random theme for DCS
  12. I hope we get one in both the South Atlantic and World War II asset pack. I believe the Belgrano ironically had British SAMs
  13. When will dcs get Brooklyn-class cruisers? The Belgrano was a Brooklyn class cruiser and of course they were used by the US Navy. So will they be in the WWIi asset pack the south Atlantic or DCS core?
  14. Ideally we'll have to compromise and have both I'd love to get the Oscar as well, and full carrier wings for the Japanese, US and Royal Navy.
  15. I wonder if anyone has asked them yet?
  16. Yet another thread from me complaining about the lack of a naval environment in DCS. My list- first more assets. The World War II asset pack needs the D-day invasion fleet as well as ships for the Marianas campaign. I'd also toss in some Kiregsmarine surface combatants like the Bismark for some what if scenarios. Cold war- just about everything. looking at what we have now and what is in the pipes here would be my list for specifics. the clemenceau and Essex class carriers for the F-8 Crusader along with their respective battlegroups The Forestall class cariers should have Kidd and Spruance class destroyers as escorts along with one of the nuclear cruisers. Then modern assets- Charles DeGual Queen Elizabeth (AI F-35B and Raf) whatever Chinese carrier we have information for As ya'll know I also want the Iowas in DCS core- at least the 1980s if not earlier fittings Next in the mission editor- I'd like the option to customize the ships load out when possible. For example the missile tubes on a Tico or Burke can hold both Standard SAMs and Tomahawk missiles. improved damage modeling. I'd like to have systems get damaged
  17. that would be awesome to see this fixed.
  18. That's what I have read too so it won't be too hard to do if we get an a.
  19. Fix the attack group waypoint- you might require a forward observer to verify the group is destroyed. Might even have forward observers call in artillery heck might do one better than 1 and have a spotter calling in fire missions More shell types - smoke, illumination, guided, HE and armor piercing select shell type and caliber-this would be especially good if / when we get some battleships and gun-armed cruisers. an interface to act as a fac / forward observer for AI.
  20. I have asked for this too
×
×
  • Create New...