upyr1

The next question is which would you like to fly? In my view when it comes to adding missing AI assets the main focus should be equipment that have had longest service lives then just enough variants that you can get a reasonable career highlight reel.For example there might be 3 or 4 Hueys depending on how visually differnt they are since you could divide into 3 or 4 generations Using the 3-generation count Classic Vietnam era- the last one is the H, which is flyable The Twin Hueys - 1970s/80s/90s Super Hueys- which would be the modern ones.

Historically the Marines used two seat hornets for some missions. My question is how hard would it be to add a second seat to the hornet we have

How about the Cessna T-41 Mescalero (It's basically a 172 used as a trainer). Seriously while I think there is little market for this commercially this might be good as a mod. Though I would side with the O-1 Birddog

I'm looking forward to this I also hope we get repelling from choppers too

I'm sure someone would have fun with this- I'd happily settle for more 1970s and 80s assets for Germany right now. (I'm not saying no to the Vietnam map just saying let's populate Germany first) same

The USAf version used the flying boom.

The basic problem with modern products is that it can be difficult to find the data on them. Right now we have the F-35A, and Eurofighter Typhoon on the way. However we really don't need to be as accurate with AI. For example the J-15 its way more advanced than the Su-33 we have we don't have enough data for a J-15 module but you may have enough information for a good AI asset. Frankly I don't care when the cold war ended, we need more assets for all eras. The F-4 Phantom needs some 1960s and 70s assets the F-35A needs modern

I'm not saying don't stop development I am just pointing out that I don't know if he's trying to be funny if this is an actual concern (right now) but I empathize with someone dealing with a feature getting reported as a bug. So I want optional random weapons failures.

There is some Merch I just wish we was easier to find.

I don't have to be the one dealing with the bug reports to have empathy for those who do.

I work in customer service. I deal with stupid people all day.

Bug reports. if you're failing to launch a missile is that a bug or a realistic failure? Someone who doesn't rtfm will figure it's a bug.

This would be a good option, but I would have it disabled by default

I posted "I want it all" by Queen as a simple reminder of how the wish list works. Please don't be the guy that Frankie was singing about in the line as funny as it may seem Some people get their kicks Stomping on a dream It's important to remember that in the virtual skies of DCS there are going to be some modules you simply don't want. That doesn't mean other people don't want it. DCS lives or dies based on ED and the other developers abbility to provide as many differnt modules in as many differnt eras as possible. I make jokes that the official DCS wishlist is published by Janes. He's passed away but the A-26 pilot I know was also a P-38 pilot. No matter which version we get I'd love to have Newt's Livery in DCS

Those also on my wwii wish list.

Other sims are irrelevant around here. edit and besides its an F-16 sim and I want the A-26 I already have the F-16 I want to have as many different vehicles from as many different eras as possible, as both playable modules and AI assets. I use the word vehicle because I want to see tanks, ships, anything else you can think of. There are limits to what we can get; however, that doesn't mean we shouldn't ask for things. This is the stinking Wish list. What is important to remember is that just becuse you don't want a module doesn't mean other people don't. So what DCS always needs are more developers, modules, and assets.

https://forum.dcs.world/forum/613-dcs-eurofighter/ The Eurofighter is on the way https://forum.dcs.world/forum/1300-dcs-f-35a/ and so is the F-35. You know what we're really lacking? Korean and Vietnam era planes- and as stated earlier, the A-26 served in both wars. I really dis like the Do X instead of Y threads I say wether or not you want to buy a module, please agree with the Farrokh Bulsara school of module development, "I want it all"

More assets are welcome, as are more modules.

The natural home for the MiG-17 would be Vietnam. They didn't see action in Korea, and the German, Sinai, and Iraqi maps we have are all set in the wrong period. I'm not saying I won't be flying the MiG-17 there (because you use what you got.)

Thanks for the list if variants.

SUggest would have worked better than offer which would have worked better than offend which I think could be an auto correct error like ducking mad

why not both? I really hate these X instead of Y threads when Y has been announced.

I'm not sure which variant(s) but this would be good for WWII to the Vietnam era

Shame. Looking at the naval module line up the 1980's configuration would work quite well.

Why not actually contribute something here?