kontiuka

nice! Any future plans to update the magnetic backup compass so it moves more realistically? Thanks again.

Not really. When you describe features as a "joke", I wouldn't call that polite. There's a way to critique without being offensive and hyperbolic. Not to say he didn't make some valid points but the delivery certainly sounded like he had a personal axe to grind.

Thanks for another big update, guys.:thumbup: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4069801#post4069801

This is high on my wish list but I can wait until higher priority stuff is taken care of.

Just tried the fracturing handle. Cool stuff. Question: How does the fracturing handle actually work to smash the canopy?

Thanks for the update, guys! DCS C-101 by AvioDev -DH light will not illuminate now, when triggered, if secondary DC bus is not powered or RAD ALT CB is pulled. -Added radio altimeter switch functionality. -Added canopy fracturing lever functionality and effects (depressurization, visual effect and sound). -C-101CC main altimeter baro setting synchronization in multicrew: the rear cockpit main altimeter uses the forward cockpit altimeter pressure setting. -C-101EB VHF radio (ARC-134) multicrew synchronization implemented. -Added explosive depressurization to Mission Editor failures. -Several fixes regarding canopies functionality both in multicrew and in single player. -Corrected radio altimeter name in ES localization (Radioaltímetro <-> CC Radioaltímetro). -Added depressurization due to damage of front or rear canopies. -Improved fractured canopy model and texture of cockpit view. -Cabin will depressurize now when ejecting. -Fixed binding to keyboard and HOTAS of ARC-164 UHF radio knobs and switches. -Added IFF Reply Test Lamp and IFF Test Light control inputs, which were missing. -Fixed Standby Horizon Pitch Reference Adjust binding to keyboard and HOTAS. -Added hypoxia (oxygen starvation) effect. -Added ARC-164 (C-101EB UHF radio) multicrew synchronization. -Cockpit labels are now readable when using low textures option (increased resolution). -Fixed binding to keyboard and joystick of ARC-134 (C-101EB VHF radio) knobs and switches. -Fixed binding to keyboard and joystick of C-101CC V/TVU-740 radio knobs and switches. -Implemented binding to keyboard and joystick of console and instrument lights dimmers. -Implemented binding to keyboard and joystick of cabin temperature control. -Implemented binding to keyboard and joystick of intercom knobs and dials for C-101EB and C-101CC.

I didn't like it the first time I heard it but it grew on me quickly.

Maybe those spaceships at area 51 are future modules:music_whistling:.

Due to a weird limitation in DCS, you can't have a mix of both rear aspect and all aspect IR missiles. So all the missiles in the C-101 act like the rear aspect AIM-9P. Anyway, don't want to get into a discussion about it in this thread but hopefully AvioDev can find a work around for it at some point.

This may not mean much but I've been able to take on an excellent AI F-14 in a C-101CC and kill most of the time with rear aspect missiles. So, she does have some fight in her if you push the envelope. The fight started with us close abreast but pointing opposite directions. F-14 had all aspect AIM-9s.

I think it's next to impossible to perfectly trim it. Any change in speed, thrust, weight, drag, attitude will throw off the trim which is expected. I can get it pretty close where it's only losing or gaining less than 50 feet/minute. One trick is not to overcompensate on the trim and to use very gentle stick inputs (like tiny incremental tugs) to keep your climb/descent rate around zero.

I'd interested to see if you could throw in some triggers so that you get some warning from the AI before it is about to do a manoeuver. Theoretically possible but probably a bit of work. Might play around with the concept when I'm on vacay.

I think the player/AI wingman interaction is kind of limited at the moment for DCS in general. For instance, I don't think they will even follow you in a loop. And you can't make them land with you. A work around, I guess, would be to have an AI flight leader but it would be pretty tricky to be a player wingman unless you practiced the routine dozens of times. Even then, it would be hard to pull off perfectly.

I watched the track and your engine did catch fire but it was mid flight. Not on the taxiway.

I've not seen either of those issues. Maybe attach a track?

Don't want to speak too much for the devs but we probably won't see too many meaty updates until next year.

and gravity!!!!!!!!

but why the title "interesting offer"?

He didn't omit it. It was just mentioned briefly. Anyway, he gave the C-101 nearly the same amount of time as more complex modules so I'll give him kudos for that.

serious question. where do you get this stuff?

I've found a similar issue with the Tunguska ... https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=239396

Looks great!

no thanks