Prowler111

Very interesting discussion...the main problem with developing a DCS sea harrier is the fact that there is no reasonable blue vixen radar info available (prove me wrong and we'll talk) Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

i need some info regarding ships in DCS, any ship builder here please contact me via pm

Had to try...:-)

The main issue with later models engines were compressor stalls due to powered dives, which is also simulated in the FSX version (as well as the temperature)

We are developing a P version since an actual P version is on our reach, now if it will get into any other variant, time will tell

Basically getting 1st hand info for the model maker, it´s a long road ahead, and i´ll be making some interesting announcements regarding this module when time comes

Well, she was all dressed up for my inspection (one of many to come)

Gents In order to avoid confusion with the A/T-27 Tucano, the older thread was closed and this one was created, please continue discussions about the A-29B here

Well...we are depicting a late AV-8B NA, the kind that was fielded during OIF and OEF and by then precisicion guided weapons were employed..BUT the MK-20 is the main CBU used Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

NO..that´s the real deal progress, no more eye candy, of course some stuff is still work of progress but none of it it´s code related

..we are not there yet..but of course will happen..have you seen our FSX/P3D Pilot?

It´s a matter of time, i´m proud of the whole team, each one got their own responsibilities, we´ll get where i want them to be and fulfill the 2 modules per year criteria..we are here for a long relationship with ED. Keep in mind that most of our projected modules are avionics intensive models, so there have to be a balance somewhere, were each new project is a learning process that will benefit the next one in line and so on.

A-7 is going to happen, when i posted pics of what we have in the sim i was clear about it, thing is, we have to get our stuff right, and this is what I´m working right now, as a 3d developer. The A-7 is also my work, so it will have to wait until i have time to devote to it accordingly. About the T-2C..it´s pretty much shelved, even as we have lots of work in it, but not a priority of any kind for the time being, It´s was a great learning platform, it might see the light of DCS, but i guess you´ll rather see some A-7 than a T-2, right?

Not at all

Gents: Thanks for all the positive messages and constructive criticism, rest assured we read everything and take notes on suggestions and always open to ideas. But 3rd party simulator content development is a time consuming and resource demanding en devour, so we need to set a road map to follow. Thanks for all the wish lists (really, appreciate the confidence in us), rest assured that when time comes, we´ll do it (provided we can, due to license agreements with ED) Our current schedule is the following (in no particular order) AV-8B Night Attack Harrier II Mig-19 (final versions to be announced) A-29 Super Tucano Mirage III These are what we are currently working on, with dedicated teams with no conflicts between each project, you can follow their progress thru here or our Facebook page. Also, we are putting final touches to the M2000C module. Deadlines have been set, no, they can not be announced, but you´ll have at least 1 new module this year (my personal goal is 2 a year, let´s see if it can happen) Once again, thanks for the confidence, rest assured 2017 is going to be a very busy year for us. Best regards Ron

In 1962, Egyptian MiG-19s saw some action in the ground-attack role during the civil war in Yemen during the early 1960s. The first reported air combat in the Mideast with the MiG-19 was on 29 November 1966, when two Egyptian MiG-19 fighters battled Israeli Mirage IIICs. The Israelis claimed two kills and no losses. Around 80 MiG-19s were in service with Egypt during the Six-Day War in 1967, but more than half were destroyed on the ground during the opening Israeli airstrikes of Operation Focus. Israeli pilots, however, did find the MiG-19 a potentially dangerous adversary because of its performance, maneuverability, and heavy armament. Following the war, the Egyptians organized the surviving MiG-19 aircraft and assigned them air defense tasks of Egypt's interior. The Soviet Union did not supply Egypt with any replacement of the MiG-19s destroyed in the Six Day War, but Egypt might have received some from Syria and Iraq, so that by the end of 1968 there were 80+ MiG-19s in service with the Egyptian Air Force (EAF). The aircraft also saw combat during the War of Attrition; in one engagement on 19 May 1969, a MiG-19 aircraft engaged two Israeli Mirages, shooting down one with cannon fire while the other escaped.[22] Egypt had around 60 Mig-19s in service during the Yom Kippur War of 1973 in which they served as close air support aircraft. The Iraqis obtained some MiG-19S fighters in the early 1960s, but later sold them all off (a couple remaining in local museums), though the survivors did see some action against the Kurds in the 1960s. It is claimed that the Iranians acquired a batch of their own F-6s. Source Wikipedia

Nothing can be commented on this subject, please understand

In all honesty, i really don´t know yet, is a gamble, and i consider myself very fortunate to find such a proficient ship modeler, we´ll see, what i can confirm is that one is being worked on

Lets not get out of line..we do like constructive criticism, the main reason we post "WiP's" (Work in Progress) pics, and always open to changes. But what needs to be kept under consideration is that these are early renditions Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Just to put some clarifications here(right from the source) We announced we are going to do an A-7 for DCS from day 1 we were granted a 3rd party developer license for DCS. The Mig23 incident is something entirely different, and has nothing to do with our original, scheduled, lineup. Pertinent to the A-7, we can´t do the same approach as we did with them in FSX/P3D simply because it´s not practical, there will be the E (as in late Bu No´s E version), and we´ll see if we can squeeze the D (as in late D version) and that´s it, there are enough differences between them to keep us quite busy, other versions (H, P etc) have their own differences, too many to make it a practical module (in terms of development times).HAF users can take advantage of the fact that their late SLUFF´s were in fact ex USN late E´s, with all the bells and whistles sans nuclear capacity. (and I mention HAF since they were the last users)

Not a full release, same stuff as the M 2000C