Jump to content

KL0083

Members
  • Posts

    184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by KL0083

  1. According to recent observation, alone with rocket jam previous noted,the rumor about prone-to jam strike weapon is not limited to only Nevada but a common feature to both field and weapon catagory since latest update. As we can see on this pic.In this little interdiction,with even all settings good,all weapons just like glud on rack when you even push relase button through the stick. What a shame when you dash pn treetop hundred miles but the cargo just refuse to leave on target!?十^ 皿^''''''''''
  2. Wish that could be a Mirage G for DCS. = ω=.
  3. Also featured........................................................ https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/2145572/
  4. Alone with Checkmate KQVN livery,I'm long resisted to paint this livery due to simply that this tatto has never be applied with F-5E. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/2146231/
  5. I think,it should be a much close approach to makes another F-5E flyable. May not be too much difference between these two,but it looks just strange to paint sharknose black or when you know that some operators actually without flight with this type.................................................
  6. KL0083

    F-5E Livery-Thread

    Complete.................................almost! WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
  7. KL0083

    F-5E Livery-Thread

    Under Construction...............................
  8. All what we need now is only a layered template,but when!?
  9. KL0083

    F-5E Livery-Thread

    Still no idea about how to makes the tail number removal,pity!
  10. KL0083

    F-5E Livery-Thread

    Try "USAF Aggressors" = ω=.
  11. KL0083

    F-5E Livery-Thread

    [ame] [/ame] :thumbup:
  12. KL0083

    F-5E Livery-Thread

    Since without a layered-template available,it's the best I can do so far.As usual,the problem's about nose number still lefted no solve.XD Dispite the utter,this little machine's really fun to fly and I've lovin it! = ω=.
  13. Everytime and every update,I'm all looking forward that the ugly spot can erase from the fuselage and return the beautiful livery back to us again.But,however,ones again,all we recive is that the updates not only disappoint us time and again but the UGLY STAINS get even STINK and YELLOW!!!!! Really,was that so hard to have a CLEAN sink on this one?was that so hard to promote new modules without doom the former!? :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
  14. As you can find on the pics and as we all knowns,since the BI operates only F-40 sabre,then there's always a rumour about the white "gap" between wingtip and slatted inner-area which doesn't featured hard-wing Saber and no-solve at current stage then make this work stall. I suggest,it's not too late to put this idea on schedule until there's a F-40 or complete Sabre family issues on this one. :)
  15. KL0083

    P51 Korea FF-736

    Like this @@? http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/1322752/
  16. KL0083

    P51 Korea FF-736

    No,due to some littie detail have to be correct,the relesae will be later. But I'll make it intact ASAP.
  17. Thanks so much,it works just great!:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
×
×
  • Create New...