Skitter

The tents were actually part of a mod. Maybe that's why.

So much potential in that module !!

Thanks for the link. It doesn't really say what is going to be "enhanced / update". And it doesn't say that anything is going to be fixed .

I don't know if it was a mission design flaw or is it the game. There were bunch of static tents on a mission I played yesterday. My tanks and a Bradley got fixated on firing everything they've got at a bunch of tents. I believe th tents where actually indestructible. Also, I saw a TOW going into an already burning Command vehicle :-/ This game is long time due for a lifting. I usually just use the stinger as a JTAC. But played as GFC yesterday and it really has a potential, but there are serious show stoppers there.

I played a game as Ground Force Commander yesterday. It's so bad you don't get any reports from your ground forces. If you have pretty stretched front line and few units the only way to discover they are taking damage is by counting them up. Also there's no any information about your units engaging targets. No sign on map or whatever. You have to F7 to actually notice they're firing.

Well, I believe they did: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3543157&postcount=613 If you can make them to give explanation and deadlines that would be great.

RAZBAM has declared that the module is "complete". See the RAZBAM owner's comment regarding development. I have not seen them making any promises. Especially towards deadlines. They release some fixes once in a while... Hard to say really.

Because: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3543157&postcount=613 So basically everything like: Police lights, HUD brightness knob, NAV... is either working as expected, used by ground crew, or it's ED's fault. I believe it's a mature thing to do to admit you can't deliver. But RAZBAM has chosen the way of denial.

I think you're missing "NAV light not synchronized in the dimm mode" in the list. But I've mentioned it like three times already.

Ha! I share your pain my friend. It would great indeed. I am waiting for it a long long time.

Thanks BlacleyCole, will have a look around, cheers

Thanks

Hi, Does the artificial runway system relies on inertial navigation / ILS / Both / Something else ? Shouldn't it drift if your Nav calibration is off ? Just curious.

According to RAZBAM, it must be like that in real life. Or maybe the light is only used by the ground crew. Or it's ED's fault. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3543157&postcount=613

Hi there, I wonder how hard it would be to create a dedicated JTAC unit.Is it possible to do as an amateur ? Primarily: - Create better binoculars view, not the "I am looking through an empty toilet paper roll", look. Secondary: - Change model to one without a stinger. Just normal M4. Or even better...create a new model that actually looks like a JTAC, with a radio on his back etc. I code in Java and some Python...and whatever is needed at work.. Do you think it's possible with my skills ?

I am just going to point to this post by Prowler. It was right before they had dropped development of Mirage to work on Harrier beta release. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2680558&postcount=38

It's quite clear what's RAZBAM policy is. The Mirage is "complete". And that's their official stand. It says it all. Do I need to say anything else ? I probably do. Features like: nav lights synchronized over net only in full bright position. HUD brightness knob, countermeasures light switch and many other switches, especially in the area of radar display are non-functional. The nav lights one bigger than the other. The weapon modes are implemented incorrectly. The audio , especially opening, closing and sealing the canopy is utterly awful. The quality of the sample is just rock bottom. There are many things that do not require ED's help, like those above. And some that maybe do. But I believe INS update used to work and now it doesn't and RAZBAM is not fixing it. The centerline tank does not fill up anymore. As Prowler said, "these lines of code are not going to write themselves". But Mirage is a complete module hahaha... Looking at the line up of modules they have opened and will be looking to sell as Beta is crazy. I mean, what's already in development: Mirage 2000C, Harrier, Tucano, Mirage III, Mig-19, mig-23, F-15E, (Sea stallion too?) a new theatre. Have I missed something ? To finish Harrier RAZBAM dropped work on Mirage for a year....and today it is now in complete (= nearing finish) state. Let that sink in. Obviously there are plenty of people who will buy anything. Also people who'll buy their favorite aircraft doesn't matter the price or state. That's why RAZBAM will continue doing what they are doing. Keep producing unfinished modules, cash in on them and strangely take a big pride in it. I am not in for another battle with hardcore RAZBAM fans. I understand that you want your modules whatever the state. Take care.. I'd buy a Beta from ED or Heatblur.

Worth to mention the INS is not implemented correctly by RAZBAM. The INS drifts and can be updated as often as you require accurate navigation. The update process is bugged. It always reset's the INS. It doesn't update it. Not much of a simulation if you ask me. Generally the M2000C is incomplete and it doesn't seem to me like RAZBAM is planning to complete it. ot's of switches, functions simple doesn't work.

What are the inserts made of ?

Exactly my thought.

Hi guys, I didn't plan going VR when i purchased the 1060 6GB, but a friend is selling his Oculus Rift and I am considering buying. Do you think there's any chance I might actually be able to play current DCS with my card ? I've got Gigabyte Gforce GTX 1060 G1 Gaming 6G. I have a feeling I should probably let it go. Cheers

Hi guys, how this topic relates to current version of DCS? I've got Gigabyte 1060 6gb and looking to buy an Occulus rift. Do you think I'll get a reasonable performance?

+1

@DArt , thanks for the intercept heading/time feature!! It's awesome !!

Can you take control of the aircrafts as the Game Master ?